netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>,
	syzbot+0c4150bff9fff3bf023c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Subject: Re: [Patch net] net: remove the bogus overflow debug check in pskb_may_pull()
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 01:27:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240606232747.GE9890@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240606221531.255224-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>

Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
> 
> Commit 219eee9c0d16 ("net: skbuff: add overflow debug check to pull/push
> helpers") introduced an overflow debug check for pull/push helpers.
> For __skb_pull() this makes sense because its callers rarely check its
> return value. But for pskb_may_pull() it does not make sense, since its
> return value is properly taken care of. Remove the one in
> pskb_may_pull(), we can continue rely on its return value.

See 025f8ad20f2e3264d11683aa9cbbf0083eefbdcd which would not exist
without this check, I would not give up yet.

bpf_try_make_writable() could do an explicit check vs. skb->len.

If anyone needs it, splat is at
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=0c4150bff9fff3bf023c

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-06 23:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-06 22:15 [Patch net] net: remove the bogus overflow debug check in pskb_may_pull() Cong Wang
2024-06-06 23:27 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2024-06-07 16:14   ` Cong Wang
2024-06-07 21:32     ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-08  8:01       ` Eric Dumazet
2024-06-08 22:24         ` Florian Westphal
2024-06-09  2:01         ` Jason Xing
2024-06-14 10:17         ` [PATCH bpf] bpf: avoid splat in pskb_pull_reason Florian Westphal
2024-06-14 12:11           ` Eric Dumazet
2024-06-14 15:30           ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240606232747.GE9890@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+0c4150bff9fff3bf023c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).