From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@gmail.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 net-next 06/11] af_unix: Remove U_LOCK_DIAG.
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 15:34:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240610223501.73191-7-kuniyu@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240610223501.73191-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
sk_diag_dump_icons() acquires embryo's lock by unix_state_lock_nested()
to fetch its peer.
The embryo's ->peer is set to NULL only when its parent listener is
close()d. Then, unix_release_sock() is called for each embryo after
unlinking skb by skb_dequeue().
In sk_diag_dump_icons(), we hold the parent's recvq lock, so we need
not acquire unix_state_lock_nested(), and peer is always non-NULL.
Let's remove unnecessary unix_state_lock_nested() and non-NULL test
for peer.
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
---
include/net/af_unix.h | 1 -
net/unix/diag.c | 17 +++--------------
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/af_unix.h b/include/net/af_unix.h
index fd813ad73ab8..c42645199cee 100644
--- a/include/net/af_unix.h
+++ b/include/net/af_unix.h
@@ -98,7 +98,6 @@ struct unix_sock {
#define unix_state_unlock(s) spin_unlock(&unix_sk(s)->lock)
enum unix_socket_lock_class {
U_LOCK_NORMAL,
- U_LOCK_DIAG, /* used while dumping icons, see sk_diag_dump_icons(). */
U_LOCK_GC_LISTENER, /* used for listening socket while determining gc
* candidates to close a small race window.
*/
diff --git a/net/unix/diag.c b/net/unix/diag.c
index d2d66727b0da..9138af8b465e 100644
--- a/net/unix/diag.c
+++ b/net/unix/diag.c
@@ -73,20 +73,9 @@ static int sk_diag_dump_icons(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *nlskb)
buf = nla_data(attr);
i = 0;
- skb_queue_walk(&sk->sk_receive_queue, skb) {
- struct sock *req, *peer;
-
- req = skb->sk;
- /*
- * The state lock is outer for the same sk's
- * queue lock. With the other's queue locked it's
- * OK to lock the state.
- */
- unix_state_lock_nested(req, U_LOCK_DIAG);
- peer = unix_sk(req)->peer;
- buf[i++] = (peer ? sock_i_ino(peer) : 0);
- unix_state_unlock(req);
- }
+ skb_queue_walk(&sk->sk_receive_queue, skb)
+ buf[i++] = sock_i_ino(unix_peer(skb->sk));
+
spin_unlock(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
}
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-10 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-10 22:34 [PATCH v1 net-next 00/11] af_unix: Remove spin_lock_nested() and convert to lock_cmp_fn Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-10 22:34 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 01/11] af_unix: Define locking order for unix_table_double_lock() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-10 22:43 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-06-10 23:38 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-10 23:50 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-06-10 23:58 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-11 0:30 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-06-11 0:47 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-10 22:34 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 02/11] af_unix: Define locking order for U_LOCK_SECOND in unix_state_double_lock() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-10 22:34 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 03/11] af_unix: Don't retry after unix_state_lock_nested() in unix_stream_connect() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-10 22:34 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 04/11] af_unix: Define locking order for U_LOCK_SECOND " Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-10 22:34 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 05/11] af_unix: Don't acquire unix_state_lock() for sock_i_ino() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-10 22:34 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2024-06-10 22:34 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 07/11] af_unix: Remove U_LOCK_GC_LISTENER Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-10 22:34 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 08/11] af_unix: Remove U_RECVQ_LOCK_EMBRYO Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-10 22:34 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 09/11] af_unix: Set sk_peer_pid/sk_peer_cred locklessly for new socket Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-10 22:35 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 10/11] af_unix: Remove put_pid()/put_cred() in copy_peercred() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-10 22:35 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 11/11] af_unix: Don't use spin_lock_nested() " Kuniyuki Iwashima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240610223501.73191-7-kuniyu@amazon.com \
--to=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).