From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7486BB663; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 02:38:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718159919; cv=none; b=SKmYkVSMGU7HlkpUVY+qOqlxJDiAbxfxxVO7iVWf/JCyDsugtWbq6cvQ2b6reb46PAdnexAkzIkIRVM5kNxGNV73clZ+DsxkKPkV5RlslBqdiS0JMqOxtebYkL9fUyay7ZYv51jcj5tvooQU6VeNBOPVimc/x+0zG8iabXkaPHE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718159919; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vmyR4QR4O0qDRG2Tdpec3h1CFmxBVl5p9LVA9RJcQdI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=i0V/WzMQJ/N49U3gvxRE/Z4gftEc2DfoyXagDaugPnTaRn9s3zCf1KVDKFZDD5oGe2VocZLly9hB4vc6ICdfFzOiVPUQ6Pdoz+1YnuqH/Y11XU5OuFbwBPNxW7YUQaZB0N48wAmEGcAfC6xNd2RmVI9zJTjoX2NB0Z0DZL3/JHM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=q4Dbs5Rh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="q4Dbs5Rh" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 470C9C2BD10; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 02:38:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1718159919; bh=vmyR4QR4O0qDRG2Tdpec3h1CFmxBVl5p9LVA9RJcQdI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=q4Dbs5RhFMxmCf4wPg98NTH3+/I9L9tA8L1Dd26Ree+az3alISPp++DLwEbTkooeH 7mpqTsp9L/TwFgkAjzxpaT0/Kk5w8gOnfgtgtRZrgfj5Wlx9NUmcIhNSlVmo0dTFMF dORbD3frvAt4dw59LOqQwFNcU84Dvn+HPYmyx85C34rQWHw1Gl/zaoUdVXXZSos7is FsrbDHVYi2UP7BDpb3xsrZRI9MXvDIIr/vK1VbICxBgo3ltEOvpfAWLxJ9GU2Q1OWd L3lLtlPtaxHjWkW35y1KupSpchPvTxCOLmHTCmQXklypyRGgJ5lIrdueFfSSrUpnQo 7MMRvmyt2cQxw== Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 19:38:37 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Larysa Zaremba Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, Jesse Brandeburg , Tony Nguyen , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , John Fastabend , Maciej Fijalkowski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, magnus.karlsson@intel.com, Michal Kubiak Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net 0/3] ice: fix synchronization between .ndo_bpf() and reset Message-ID: <20240611193837.4ffb2401@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20240610153716.31493-1-larysa.zaremba@intel.com> References: <20240610153716.31493-1-larysa.zaremba@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 17:37:12 +0200 Larysa Zaremba wrote: > Fix the problems that are triggered by tx_timeout and ice_xdp() calls, > including both pool and program operations. Is there really no way for ice to fix the locking? :( The busy loops and trylocks() are not great, and seem like duct tape.