From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: "Maciej Żenczykowski" <maze@google.com>
Cc: Linux NetDev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: Some sort of netlink RTM_GET(ROUTE|RULE|NEIGH) regression(?) in 6.10-rc3 vs 6.9
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 06:29:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240613062927.54b15104@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANP3RGc1RG71oPEBXNx_WZFP9AyphJefdO4paczN92n__ds4ow@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 14:18:41 +0200 Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:
> The Android net tests
> (available at https://cs.android.com/android/platform/superproject/main/+/main:kernel/tests/net/test/
> more specifically multinetwork_test.py & neighbour_test.py)
> run via:
> /...aosp-tests.../net/test/run_net_test.sh --builder
> from within a 6.10-rc3 kernel tree are falling over due to a *plethora* of:
> TypeError: NLMsgHdr requires a bytes object of length 16, got 4
>
> The problems might be limited to RTM_GETROUTE and RTM_GETRULE and RTM_GETNEIGH,
> as various other netlink using xfrm tests appear to be okay...
>
> (note: 6.10-rc3 also fails to build for UML due to a buggy bpf change,
> but I sent out a 1-line fix for that already:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20240613112520.1526350-1-maze@google.com/
> )
>
> It is of course entirely possible the test code is buggy in how it
> parses netlink, but it has worked for years and years...
>
> Before I go trying to bisect this... anyone have any idea what might
> be the cause?
> Perhaps some sort of change to how these dumps work? Some sort of new
> netlink extended errors?
Take a look at commit 5b4b62a169e1 ("rtnetlink: make the "split"
NLM_DONE handling generic"), there may be more such workarounds missing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-13 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-13 12:18 Some sort of netlink RTM_GET(ROUTE|RULE|NEIGH) regression(?) in 6.10-rc3 vs 6.9 Maciej Żenczykowski
2024-06-13 13:29 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-06-13 14:21 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2024-06-13 14:59 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240613062927.54b15104@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=maze@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).