netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, dev@openvswitch.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>,
	Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC net-next 4/7] selftests: openvswitch: Add support for tunnel() key.
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 17:27:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240616162743.GJ8447@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240613181333.984810-5-aconole@redhat.com>

On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 02:13:30PM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote:
> This will be used when setting details about the tunnel to use as
> transport.  There is a difference between the ODP format between tunnel():
> the 'key' flag is not actually a flag field, so we don't support it in the
> same way that the vswitchd userspace supports displaying it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>

...

> @@ -1265,6 +1265,165 @@ class ovskey(nla):
>                  init=init,
>              )
>  
> +    class ovs_key_tunnel(nla):
> +        nla_flags = NLA_F_NESTED
> +
> +        nla_map = (
> +            ("OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_ID", "be64"),
> +            ("OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_IPV4_SRC", "ipaddr"),
> +            ("OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_IPV4_DST", "ipaddr"),
> +            ("OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_TOS", "uint8"),
> +            ("OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_TTL", "uint8"),
> +            ("OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_DONT_FRAGMENT", "flag"),
> +            ("OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_CSUM", "flag"),
> +            ("OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_OAM", "flag"),
> +            ("OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_GENEVE_OPTS", "array(uint32)"),
> +            ("OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_TP_SRC", "be16"),
> +            ("OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_TP_DST", "be16"),
> +            ("OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_VXLAN_OPTS", "none"),
> +            ("OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_IPV6_SRC", "ipaddr"),
> +            ("OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_IPV6_DST", "ipaddr"),
> +            ("OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_PAD", "none"),
> +            ("OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_ERSPAN_OPTS", "none"),
> +            ("OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_IPV4_INFO_BRIDGE", "flag"),
> +        )
> +
> +        def parse(self, flowstr, mask=None):
> +            if not flowstr.startswith("tunnel("):
> +                return None, None
> +
> +            k = ovskey.ovs_key_tunnel()
> +            if mask is not None:
> +                mask = ovskey.ovs_key_tunnel()
> +
> +            flowstr = flowstr[len("tunnel("):]
> +
> +            v6_address = None
> +
> +            fields = [
> +                ("tun_id=", r"(\d+)", int, "OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_ID",
> +                 0xffffffffffffffff, None, None),
> +
> +                ("src=", r"([0-9a-fA-F\.]+)", str,
> +                 "OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_IPV4_SRC", "255.255.255.255", "0.0.0.0",
> +                 False),
> +                ("dst=", r"([0-9a-fA-F\.]+)", str,
> +                 "OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_IPV4_DST", "255.255.255.255", "0.0.0.0",
> +                 False),
> +
> +                ("ipv6_src=", r"([0-9a-fA-F:]+)", str,
> +                 "OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_IPV6_SRC",
> +                 "ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff", "::", True),
> +                ("ipv6_dst=", r"([0-9a-fA-F:]+)", str,
> +                 "OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_IPV6_DST",
> +                 "ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff", "::", True),
> +
> +                ("tos=", r"(\d+)", int, "OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_TOS", 255, 0,
> +                 None),
> +                ("ttl=", r"(\d+)", int, "OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_TTL", 255, 0,
> +                 None),
> +
> +                ("tp_src=", r"(\d+)", int, "OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_TP_SRC",
> +                 65535, 0, None),
> +                ("tp_dst=", r"(\d+)", int, "OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_TP_DST",
> +                 65535, 0, None),
> +            ]
> +
> +            forced_include = ["OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_TTL"]
> +
> +            for prefix, regex, typ, attr_name, mask_val, default_val, v46_flag in fields:
> +                flowstr, value = parse_extract_field(flowstr, prefix, regex, typ, False)
> +                if not attr_name:
> +                    raise Exception("Bad list value in tunnel fields")
> +
> +                if value is None and attr_name in forced_include:
> +                    value = default_val
> +                    mask_val = default_val
> +
> +                if value is not None:
> +                    if v6_address is None and v46_flag is not None:
> +                        v6_address = v46_flag

By my reading, at this point v6_address will only be None if v46_flag is
not None.  IF so, the condition below seems excessive.

> +                    if v6_address is not None and v46_flag is not None \
> +                       and v46_flag != v6_address:
> +                        raise ValueError("Cannot mix v6 and v4 addresses")

I wonder if we can instead express this as (completely untested!):

                    if v46_flag is not None:
                        if v6_address is None:
                            v6_address = v46_flag
                        if v46_flag != v6_address:
                            raise ValueError("Cannot mix v6 and v4 addresses")

> +                    k["attrs"].append([attr_name, value])
> +                    if mask is not None:
> +                        mask["attrs"].append([attr_name, mask_val])
> +                else:
> +                    if v6_address is not None and v46_flag is not None \
> +                       and v46_flag != v6_address:
> +                        continue
> +                    if v6_address is None and v46_flag is not None:
> +                        continue

And I wonder if this is a bit easier on the eyes (also completely untested):

                    if v46_flag is not None:
                        if v6_address is None or v46_flag != v6_address:
                            continue

> +                    if mask is not None:
> +                        mask["attrs"].append([attr_name, default_val])
> +
> +            if k["attrs"][0][0] != "OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_ID":
> +                raise ValueError("Needs a tunid set")

...

> @@ -1745,7 +1905,7 @@ class OvsVport(GenericNetlinkSocket):
>          )
>  
>          TUNNEL_DEFAULTS = [("geneve", 6081),
> -                           ("vxlan", 4798)]
> +                           ("vxlan", 4789)]
>  
>          for tnl in TUNNEL_DEFAULTS:
>              if ptype == tnl[0]:

As noted in my response to PATCH 1/7, I think that the
change in the hunk above belongs there rather than here.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-16 16:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-13 18:13 [RFC net-next 0/7] selftests: net: Switch pmtu.sh to use the internal ovs script Aaron Conole
2024-06-13 18:13 ` [RFC net-next 1/7] selftests: openvswitch: Support explicit tunnel port creation Aaron Conole
2024-06-16 16:25   ` [ovs-dev] " Simon Horman
2024-06-17 17:03     ` Aaron Conole
2024-06-13 18:13 ` [RFC net-next 2/7] selftests: openvswitch: Refactor actions parsing Aaron Conole
2024-06-16 16:29   ` [ovs-dev] " Simon Horman
2024-06-13 18:13 ` [RFC net-next 3/7] selftests: openvswitch: Add set() and set_masked() support Aaron Conole
2024-06-16 16:29   ` [ovs-dev] " Simon Horman
2024-06-17 12:18   ` Adrián Moreno
2024-06-17 17:07     ` Aaron Conole
2024-06-13 18:13 ` [RFC net-next 4/7] selftests: openvswitch: Add support for tunnel() key Aaron Conole
2024-06-16 16:27   ` Simon Horman [this message]
2024-06-17 17:56     ` [ovs-dev] " Aaron Conole
2024-06-13 18:13 ` [RFC net-next 5/7] selftests: openvswitch: Support implicit ipv6 arguments Aaron Conole
2024-06-16 16:28   ` [ovs-dev] " Simon Horman
2024-06-17 17:03     ` Aaron Conole
2024-06-13 18:13 ` [RFC net-next 6/7] selftests: net: Use the provided dpctl rather than the vswitchd for tests Aaron Conole
2024-06-13 20:37   ` Stefano Brivio
2024-06-14 15:53     ` Aaron Conole
2024-06-13 18:13 ` [RFC net-next 7/7] selftests: net: add config for openvswitch Aaron Conole
2024-06-16 16:30   ` [ovs-dev] " Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240616162743.GJ8447@kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).