From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AC8D13F426 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 18:17:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718734635; cv=none; b=WNcri6uWzyegxaOl8EJzm2eUb7/B4CFBIv6qgk5BL89ej50XTuJF9gbd5XCpH7yAbTUOo1uEaG21CRR5bcnUgwIoDGJOPBlwwU0MAlFvzgibJqdr1YKmXVMYtG3kWon4+qWzMu+1IMYgCAxqwCt2IZEVz//CBd4uVGCgoezW0uQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718734635; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oXZ1eZOsIbOZdsU9kJD6xYEB+sMGXbiAsCiEj0kMdCA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=XlCIpKLd8md1EbIOMw7hvMf9BqCuWho+YttzDHUqXvCaZZMqce+oK5XIVKuvswH3UYjffNR/GgleLFwgjSyb70MRzd0twuveZIJL6ZYBjhwaYM67uVCRK56qKJOXJ9ZFDXXss4P4ZggweNx9hwDOEqMYo+uMdHfx5hX9zjrjJbk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=MPzlY2l8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="MPzlY2l8" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D2B6CC3277B; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 18:17:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1718734634; bh=oXZ1eZOsIbOZdsU9kJD6xYEB+sMGXbiAsCiEj0kMdCA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=MPzlY2l8dNaYuxVwBaItfk/MUTjMQ0QSNQb6KAw/513XRbWHZ027yLjoU/Yz/EzTA dqhfOQvJgUTTJujNnWFPR5gH+3NYTgGzxsV80VmCtWuyms4Zi8TnNTdpqoub0u/bhy O3UEVMWDIxW3Bitpy7iI1WajdBxlfRUd6nVemqKvr1bnq1KrkRoFstT16ZldJ6qhVb zp/XMcvnRxOohj8mWCUTR3W3ymKcm/ubENHoe8/GA2M1F/SERf4T9iiq0LlWQIuT9/ EQZ/i/6Ac4sX4mI2MjJ6LBaBRHk748gwoZPZvkEQxy3mRnqBnyCWsYNHRwWPcUrT3a 3Ib03t6u26o6Q== Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 19:17:11 +0100 From: Simon Horman To: Christian Hopps Cc: devel@linux-ipsec.org, Steffen Klassert , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec-next v4 00/18] Add IP-TFS mode to xfrm Message-ID: <20240618181711.GW8447@kernel.org> References: <20240617205316.939774-1-chopps@chopps.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240617205316.939774-1-chopps@chopps.org> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 04:52:58PM -0400, Christian Hopps wrote: > * Summary of Changes: > > This patchset adds a new xfrm mode implementing on-demand IP-TFS. IP-TFS > (AggFrag encapsulation) has been standardized in RFC9347. > > Link: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9347.txt > > This feature supports demand driven (i.e., non-constant send rate) > IP-TFS to take advantage of the AGGFRAG ESP payload encapsulation. This > payload type supports aggregation and fragmentation of the inner IP > packet stream which in turn yields higher small-packet bandwidth as well > as reducing MTU/PMTU issues. Congestion control is unimplementated as > the send rate is demand driven rather than constant. > > In order to allow loading this fucntionality as a module a set of > callbacks xfrm_mode_cbs has been added to xfrm as well. Hi Christian, This does not appear to apply to ipsec-next. Would it be possible for you to rebase?