From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v9 net-next 06/15] net/ipv4: Use nested-BH locking for ipv4_tcp_sk.
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 15:21:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240620132727.660738-7-bigeasy@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240620132727.660738-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
ipv4_tcp_sk is a per-CPU variable and relies on disabled BH for its
locking. Without per-CPU locking in local_bh_disable() on PREEMPT_RT
this data structure requires explicit locking.
Make a struct with a sock member (original ipv4_tcp_sk) and a
local_lock_t and use local_lock_nested_bh() for locking. This change
adds only lockdep coverage and does not alter the functional behaviour
for !PREEMPT_RT.
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
include/net/sock.h | 5 +++++
net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 15 +++++++++++----
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index b30ea0c342a65..cce23ac4d5148 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -544,6 +544,11 @@ struct sock {
netns_tracker ns_tracker;
};
+struct sock_bh_locked {
+ struct sock *sock;
+ local_lock_t bh_lock;
+};
+
enum sk_pacing {
SK_PACING_NONE = 0,
SK_PACING_NEEDED = 1,
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index 8e49d69279d57..fd17f25ff288a 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -93,7 +93,9 @@ static int tcp_v4_md5_hash_hdr(char *md5_hash, const struct tcp_md5sig_key *key,
struct inet_hashinfo tcp_hashinfo;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_hashinfo);
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sock *, ipv4_tcp_sk);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sock_bh_locked, ipv4_tcp_sk) = {
+ .bh_lock = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(bh_lock),
+};
static u32 tcp_v4_init_seq(const struct sk_buff *skb)
{
@@ -882,7 +884,9 @@ static void tcp_v4_send_reset(const struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
arg.tos = ip_hdr(skb)->tos;
arg.uid = sock_net_uid(net, sk && sk_fullsock(sk) ? sk : NULL);
local_bh_disable();
- ctl_sk = this_cpu_read(ipv4_tcp_sk);
+ local_lock_nested_bh(&ipv4_tcp_sk.bh_lock);
+ ctl_sk = this_cpu_read(ipv4_tcp_sk.sock);
+
sock_net_set(ctl_sk, net);
if (sk) {
ctl_sk->sk_mark = (sk->sk_state == TCP_TIME_WAIT) ?
@@ -907,6 +911,7 @@ static void tcp_v4_send_reset(const struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
sock_net_set(ctl_sk, &init_net);
__TCP_INC_STATS(net, TCP_MIB_OUTSEGS);
__TCP_INC_STATS(net, TCP_MIB_OUTRSTS);
+ local_unlock_nested_bh(&ipv4_tcp_sk.bh_lock);
local_bh_enable();
#ifdef CONFIG_TCP_MD5SIG
@@ -1002,7 +1007,8 @@ static void tcp_v4_send_ack(const struct sock *sk,
arg.tos = tos;
arg.uid = sock_net_uid(net, sk_fullsock(sk) ? sk : NULL);
local_bh_disable();
- ctl_sk = this_cpu_read(ipv4_tcp_sk);
+ local_lock_nested_bh(&ipv4_tcp_sk.bh_lock);
+ ctl_sk = this_cpu_read(ipv4_tcp_sk.sock);
sock_net_set(ctl_sk, net);
ctl_sk->sk_mark = (sk->sk_state == TCP_TIME_WAIT) ?
inet_twsk(sk)->tw_mark : READ_ONCE(sk->sk_mark);
@@ -1017,6 +1023,7 @@ static void tcp_v4_send_ack(const struct sock *sk,
sock_net_set(ctl_sk, &init_net);
__TCP_INC_STATS(net, TCP_MIB_OUTSEGS);
+ local_unlock_nested_bh(&ipv4_tcp_sk.bh_lock);
local_bh_enable();
}
@@ -3615,7 +3622,7 @@ void __init tcp_v4_init(void)
sk->sk_clockid = CLOCK_MONOTONIC;
- per_cpu(ipv4_tcp_sk, cpu) = sk;
+ per_cpu(ipv4_tcp_sk.sock, cpu) = sk;
}
if (register_pernet_subsys(&tcp_sk_ops))
panic("Failed to create the TCP control socket.\n");
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-20 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-20 13:21 [PATCH v9 net-next 00/15] locking: Introduce nested-BH locking Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:21 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 01/15] locking/local_lock: Introduce guard definition for local_lock Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:21 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 02/15] locking/local_lock: Add local nested BH locking infrastructure Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:21 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 03/15] net: Use __napi_alloc_frag_align() instead of open coding it Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:21 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 04/15] net: Use nested-BH locking for napi_alloc_cache Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:21 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 05/15] net/tcp_sigpool: Use nested-BH locking for sigpool_scratch Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:21 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2024-06-20 13:21 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 07/15] netfilter: br_netfilter: Use nested-BH locking for brnf_frag_data_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:21 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 08/15] net: softnet_data: Make xmit per task Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-22 2:12 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-24 10:20 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-24 23:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-20 13:21 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 09/15] dev: Remove PREEMPT_RT ifdefs from backlog_lock.*() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:22 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 10/15] dev: Use nested-BH locking for softnet_data.process_queue Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:22 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 11/15] lwt: Don't disable migration prio invoking BPF Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:22 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 12/15] seg6: Use nested-BH locking for seg6_bpf_srh_states Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:22 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 13/15] net: Use nested-BH locking for bpf_scratchpad Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:22 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 14/15] net: Reference bpf_redirect_info via task_struct on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-22 2:08 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-24 7:26 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-24 23:37 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-20 13:22 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 15/15] net: Move per-CPU flush-lists to bpf_net_context " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-22 2:05 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-24 7:24 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-25 0:30 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 00/15] locking: Introduce nested-BH locking patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240620132727.660738-7-bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bristot@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).