From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@netfilter.org>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@nvidia.com>,
bridge@lists.linux.dev, coreteam@netfilter.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v9 net-next 07/15] netfilter: br_netfilter: Use nested-BH locking for brnf_frag_data_storage.
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 15:21:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240620132727.660738-8-bigeasy@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240620132727.660738-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
brnf_frag_data_storage is a per-CPU variable and relies on disabled BH
for its locking. Without per-CPU locking in local_bh_disable() on
PREEMPT_RT this data structure requires explicit locking.
Add a local_lock_t to the data structure and use local_lock_nested_bh()
for locking. This change adds only lockdep coverage and does not alter
the functional behaviour for !PREEMPT_RT.
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@netfilter.org>
Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@nvidia.com>
Cc: bridge@lists.linux.dev
Cc: coreteam@netfilter.org
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
index bf30c50b56895..3c9f6538990ea 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
@@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ static inline bool is_pppoe_ipv6(const struct sk_buff *skb,
#define NF_BRIDGE_MAX_MAC_HEADER_LENGTH (PPPOE_SES_HLEN + ETH_HLEN)
struct brnf_frag_data {
+ local_lock_t bh_lock;
char mac[NF_BRIDGE_MAX_MAC_HEADER_LENGTH];
u8 encap_size;
u8 size;
@@ -144,7 +145,9 @@ struct brnf_frag_data {
__be16 vlan_proto;
};
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct brnf_frag_data, brnf_frag_data_storage);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct brnf_frag_data, brnf_frag_data_storage) = {
+ .bh_lock = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(bh_lock),
+};
static void nf_bridge_info_free(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
@@ -850,6 +853,7 @@ static int br_nf_dev_queue_xmit(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff
{
struct nf_bridge_info *nf_bridge = nf_bridge_info_get(skb);
unsigned int mtu, mtu_reserved;
+ int ret;
mtu_reserved = nf_bridge_mtu_reduction(skb);
mtu = skb->dev->mtu;
@@ -882,6 +886,7 @@ static int br_nf_dev_queue_xmit(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff
IPCB(skb)->frag_max_size = nf_bridge->frag_max_size;
+ local_lock_nested_bh(&brnf_frag_data_storage.bh_lock);
data = this_cpu_ptr(&brnf_frag_data_storage);
if (skb_vlan_tag_present(skb)) {
@@ -897,7 +902,9 @@ static int br_nf_dev_queue_xmit(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff
skb_copy_from_linear_data_offset(skb, -data->size, data->mac,
data->size);
- return br_nf_ip_fragment(net, sk, skb, br_nf_push_frag_xmit);
+ ret = br_nf_ip_fragment(net, sk, skb, br_nf_push_frag_xmit);
+ local_unlock_nested_bh(&brnf_frag_data_storage.bh_lock);
+ return ret;
}
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV6) &&
skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IPV6)) {
@@ -909,6 +916,7 @@ static int br_nf_dev_queue_xmit(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff
IP6CB(skb)->frag_max_size = nf_bridge->frag_max_size;
+ local_lock_nested_bh(&brnf_frag_data_storage.bh_lock);
data = this_cpu_ptr(&brnf_frag_data_storage);
data->encap_size = nf_bridge_encap_header_len(skb);
data->size = ETH_HLEN + data->encap_size;
@@ -916,8 +924,12 @@ static int br_nf_dev_queue_xmit(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff
skb_copy_from_linear_data_offset(skb, -data->size, data->mac,
data->size);
- if (v6ops)
- return v6ops->fragment(net, sk, skb, br_nf_push_frag_xmit);
+ if (v6ops) {
+ ret = v6ops->fragment(net, sk, skb, br_nf_push_frag_xmit);
+ local_unlock_nested_bh(&brnf_frag_data_storage.bh_lock);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ local_unlock_nested_bh(&brnf_frag_data_storage.bh_lock);
kfree_skb(skb);
return -EMSGSIZE;
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-20 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-20 13:21 [PATCH v9 net-next 00/15] locking: Introduce nested-BH locking Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:21 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 01/15] locking/local_lock: Introduce guard definition for local_lock Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:21 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 02/15] locking/local_lock: Add local nested BH locking infrastructure Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:21 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 03/15] net: Use __napi_alloc_frag_align() instead of open coding it Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:21 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 04/15] net: Use nested-BH locking for napi_alloc_cache Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:21 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 05/15] net/tcp_sigpool: Use nested-BH locking for sigpool_scratch Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:21 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 06/15] net/ipv4: Use nested-BH locking for ipv4_tcp_sk Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:21 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2024-06-20 13:21 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 08/15] net: softnet_data: Make xmit per task Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-22 2:12 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-24 10:20 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-24 23:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-20 13:21 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 09/15] dev: Remove PREEMPT_RT ifdefs from backlog_lock.*() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:22 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 10/15] dev: Use nested-BH locking for softnet_data.process_queue Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:22 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 11/15] lwt: Don't disable migration prio invoking BPF Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:22 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 12/15] seg6: Use nested-BH locking for seg6_bpf_srh_states Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:22 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 13/15] net: Use nested-BH locking for bpf_scratchpad Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-20 13:22 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 14/15] net: Reference bpf_redirect_info via task_struct on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-22 2:08 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-24 7:26 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-24 23:37 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-20 13:22 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 15/15] net: Move per-CPU flush-lists to bpf_net_context " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-22 2:05 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-24 7:24 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-25 0:30 ` [PATCH v9 net-next 00/15] locking: Introduce nested-BH locking patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240620132727.660738-8-bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=bristot@kernel.org \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=roopa@nvidia.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).