netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net, rdunlap@infradead.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] docs: net: document guidance of implementing the SR-IOV NDOs
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 18:58:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240620175855.GR959333@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240620002741.1029936-1-kuba@kernel.org>

On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 05:27:41PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> New drivers were prevented from adding ndo_set_vf_* callbacks
> over the last few years. This was expected to result in broader
> switchdev adoption, but seems to have had little effect.
> 
> Based on recent netdev meeting there is broad support for allowing
> adding those ops.
> 
> There is a problem with the current API supporting a limited number
> of VFs (100+, which is less than some modern HW supports).
> We can try to solve it by adding similar functionality on devlink
> ports, but that'd be another API variation to maintain.
> So a netlink attribute reshuffling is a more likely outcome.
> 
> Document the guidance, make it clear that the API is frozen.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

Thanks Jakub,

This is as was discussed at the public netdev call the other day [1].
And a change I supported in that meeting.

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240617083955.1039b2e3@kernel.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-06-20 17:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-20  0:27 [PATCH net-next v2] docs: net: document guidance of implementing the SR-IOV NDOs Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-20  0:48 ` Randy Dunlap
2024-06-20 17:58 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2024-06-21  9:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240620175855.GR959333@kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).