From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: James Chapman <jchapman@katalix.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, gnault@redhat.com,
samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org, ridge.kennedy@alliedtelesis.co.nz
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/8] l2tp: store l2tpv3 sessions in per-net IDR
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 13:59:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240621125940.GE1098275@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22cdf8d419a6757be449cbeb5b69203d3bb3d2dd.1718877398.git.jchapman@katalix.com>
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 12:22:38PM +0100, James Chapman wrote:
> L2TPv3 sessions are currently held in one of two fixed-size hash
> lists: either a per-net hashlist (IP-encap), or a per-tunnel hashlist
> (UDP-encap), keyed by the L2TPv3 32-bit session_id.
>
> In order to lookup L2TPv3 sessions in UDP-encap tunnels efficiently
> without finding the tunnel first via sk_user_data, UDP sessions are
> now kept in a per-net session list, keyed by session ID. Convert the
> existing per-net hashlist to use an IDR for better performance when
> there are many sessions and have L2TPv3 UDP sessions use the same IDR.
>
> Although the L2TPv3 RFC states that the session ID alone identifies
> the session, our implementation has allowed the same session ID to be
> used in different L2TP UDP tunnels. To retain support for this, a new
> per-net session hashtable is used, keyed by the sock and session
> ID. If on creating a new session, a session already exists with that
> ID in the IDR, the colliding sessions are added to the new hashtable
> and the existing IDR entry is flagged. When looking up sessions, the
> approach is to first check the IDR and if no unflagged match is found,
> check the new hashtable. The sock is made available to session getters
> where session ID collisions are to be considered. In this way, the new
> hashtable is used only for session ID collisions so can be kept small.
>
> For managing session removal, we need a list of colliding sessions
> matching a given ID in order to update or remove the IDR entry of the
> ID. This is necessary to detect session ID collisions when future
> sessions are created. The list head is allocated on first collision
> of a given ID and refcounted.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Chapman <jchapman@katalix.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tom Parkin <tparkin@katalix.com>
...
> @@ -358,39 +460,45 @@ int l2tp_session_register(struct l2tp_session *session,
> }
>
> if (tunnel->version == L2TP_HDR_VER_3) {
> - pn = l2tp_pernet(tunnel->l2tp_net);
> - g_head = l2tp_session_id_hash_2(pn, session->session_id);
> -
> - spin_lock_bh(&pn->l2tp_session_hlist_lock);
> -
> + session_key = session->session_id;
> + spin_lock_bh(&pn->l2tp_session_idr_lock);
> + err = idr_alloc_u32(&pn->l2tp_v3_session_idr, NULL,
> + &session_key, session_key, GFP_ATOMIC);
> /* IP encap expects session IDs to be globally unique, while
> - * UDP encap doesn't.
> + * UDP encap doesn't. This isn't per the RFC, which says that
> + * sessions are identified only by the session ID, but is to
> + * support existing userspace which depends on it.
> */
> - hlist_for_each_entry(session_walk, g_head, global_hlist)
> - if (session_walk->session_id == session->session_id &&
> - (session_walk->tunnel->encap == L2TP_ENCAPTYPE_IP ||
> - tunnel->encap == L2TP_ENCAPTYPE_IP)) {
> - err = -EEXIST;
> - goto err_tlock_pnlock;
> - }
> + if (err == -ENOSPC && tunnel->encap == L2TP_ENCAPTYPE_UDP) {
> + struct l2tp_session *session2;
>
> - l2tp_tunnel_inc_refcount(tunnel);
> - hlist_add_head_rcu(&session->global_hlist, g_head);
> -
> - spin_unlock_bh(&pn->l2tp_session_hlist_lock);
> - } else {
> - l2tp_tunnel_inc_refcount(tunnel);
> + session2 = idr_find(&pn->l2tp_v3_session_idr,
> + session_key);
> + err = l2tp_session_collision_add(pn, session, session2);
> + }
> + spin_unlock_bh(&pn->l2tp_session_idr_lock);
> + if (err == -ENOSPC)
> + err = -EEXIST;
> }
>
Hi James,
I believe that when the if condition above is false, then err will be
uninitialised here.
If so, as this series seems to have been applied,
could you provide a follow-up to address this?
> + if (err)
> + goto err_tlock;
> +
> + l2tp_tunnel_inc_refcount(tunnel);
> +
> hlist_add_head_rcu(&session->hlist, head);
> spin_unlock_bh(&tunnel->hlist_lock);
>
> + if (tunnel->version == L2TP_HDR_VER_3) {
> + spin_lock_bh(&pn->l2tp_session_idr_lock);
> + idr_replace(&pn->l2tp_v3_session_idr, session, session_key);
> + spin_unlock_bh(&pn->l2tp_session_idr_lock);
> + }
> +
> trace_register_session(session);
>
> return 0;
>
> -err_tlock_pnlock:
> - spin_unlock_bh(&pn->l2tp_session_hlist_lock);
> err_tlock:
> spin_unlock_bh(&tunnel->hlist_lock);
>
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-21 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-20 11:22 [PATCH net-next 0/8] l2tp: don't use the tunnel socket's sk_user_data in datapath James Chapman
2024-06-20 11:22 ` [PATCH net-next 1/8] l2tp: remove unused list_head member in l2tp_tunnel James Chapman
2024-06-20 11:22 ` [PATCH net-next 2/8] l2tp: store l2tpv3 sessions in per-net IDR James Chapman
2024-06-21 12:59 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2024-06-21 16:21 ` James Chapman
2024-06-23 7:42 ` Simon Horman
2024-06-20 11:22 ` [PATCH net-next 3/8] l2tp: store l2tpv2 " James Chapman
2024-06-20 11:22 ` [PATCH net-next 4/8] l2tp: refactor udp recv to lookup to not use sk_user_data James Chapman
2024-06-20 11:22 ` [PATCH net-next 5/8] l2tp: don't use sk_user_data in l2tp_udp_encap_err_recv James Chapman
2024-06-20 11:22 ` [PATCH net-next 6/8] l2tp: use IDR for all session lookups James Chapman
2024-06-20 11:22 ` [PATCH net-next 7/8] l2tp: drop the now unused l2tp_tunnel_get_session James Chapman
2024-06-20 11:22 ` [PATCH net-next 8/8] l2tp: replace hlist with simple list for per-tunnel session list James Chapman
2024-06-21 10:40 ` [PATCH net-next 0/8] l2tp: don't use the tunnel socket's sk_user_data in datapath patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240621125940.GE1098275@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=gnault@redhat.com \
--cc=jchapman@katalix.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ridge.kennedy@alliedtelesis.co.nz \
--cc=samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).