netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Rao Shoaib <Rao.Shoaib@oracle.com>,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@gmail.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 net 03/11] af_unix: Stop recv(MSG_PEEK) at consumed OOB skb.
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 18:36:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240625013645.45034-4-kuniyu@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240625013645.45034-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>

After consuming OOB data, recv() reading the preceding data must break at
the OOB skb regardless of MSG_PEEK.

Currently, MSG_PEEK does not stop recv() for AF_UNIX, and the behaviour is
not compliant with TCP.

  >>> from socket import *
  >>> c1, c2 = socketpair(AF_UNIX)
  >>> c1.send(b'hello', MSG_OOB)
  5
  >>> c1.send(b'world')
  5
  >>> c2.recv(1, MSG_OOB)
  b'o'
  >>> c2.recv(9, MSG_PEEK)  # This should return b'hell'
  b'hellworld'              # even with enough buffer.

Let's fix it by returning NULL for consumed skb and unlinking it only if
MSG_PEEK is not specified.

This patch also adds test cases that add recv(MSG_PEEK) before each recv().

Without fix:

  #  RUN           msg_oob.peek.oob_ahead_break ...
  # msg_oob.c:134:oob_ahead_break:AF_UNIX :hellworld
  # msg_oob.c:135:oob_ahead_break:Expected:hell
  # msg_oob.c:137:oob_ahead_break:Expected ret[0] (9) == expected_len (4)
  # oob_ahead_break: Test terminated by assertion
  #          FAIL  msg_oob.peek.oob_ahead_break
  not ok 13 msg_oob.peek.oob_ahead_break

With fix:

  #  RUN           msg_oob.peek.oob_ahead_break ...
  #            OK  msg_oob.peek.oob_ahead_break
  ok 13 msg_oob.peek.oob_ahead_break

Fixes: 314001f0bf92 ("af_unix: Add OOB support")
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
---
 net/unix/af_unix.c                            |  9 ++++---
 tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/msg_oob.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index 5e695a9a609c..2eaecf9d78a4 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -2613,9 +2613,12 @@ static struct sk_buff *manage_oob(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk,
 {
 	struct unix_sock *u = unix_sk(sk);
 
-	if (!unix_skb_len(skb) && !(flags & MSG_PEEK)) {
-		skb_unlink(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue);
-		consume_skb(skb);
+	if (!unix_skb_len(skb)) {
+		if (!(flags & MSG_PEEK)) {
+			skb_unlink(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue);
+			consume_skb(skb);
+		}
+
 		skb = NULL;
 	} else {
 		struct sk_buff *unlinked_skb = NULL;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/msg_oob.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/msg_oob.c
index d427d39d0806..de8d1fcde883 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/msg_oob.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/msg_oob.c
@@ -21,6 +21,21 @@ FIXTURE(msg_oob)
 				 */
 };
 
+FIXTURE_VARIANT(msg_oob)
+{
+	bool peek;
+};
+
+FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(msg_oob, no_peek)
+{
+	.peek = false,
+};
+
+FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(msg_oob, peek)
+{
+	.peek = true
+};
+
 static void create_unix_socketpair(struct __test_metadata *_metadata,
 				   FIXTURE_DATA(msg_oob) *self)
 {
@@ -156,8 +171,14 @@ static void __recvpair(struct __test_metadata *_metadata,
 	__sendpair(_metadata, self, buf, len, flags)
 
 #define recvpair(expected_buf, expected_len, buf_len, flags)		\
-	__recvpair(_metadata, self,					\
-		   expected_buf, expected_len, buf_len, flags)
+	do {								\
+		if (variant->peek)					\
+			__recvpair(_metadata, self,			\
+				   expected_buf, expected_len,		\
+				   buf_len, (flags) | MSG_PEEK);	\
+		__recvpair(_metadata, self,				\
+			   expected_buf, expected_len, buf_len, flags);	\
+	} while (0)
 
 TEST_F(msg_oob, non_oob)
 {
-- 
2.30.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-06-25  1:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-25  1:36 [PATCH v1 net 00/11] af_unix: Fix bunch of MSG_OOB bugs and add new tests Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-25  1:36 ` [PATCH v1 net 01/11] selftest: af_unix: Remove test_unix_oob.c Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-25  1:36 ` [PATCH v1 net 02/11] selftest: af_unix: Add msg_oob.c Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-26  0:44   ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-26  1:45     ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-26  2:01       ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-27 14:05   ` kernel test robot
2024-06-25  1:36 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2024-06-26 16:56   ` [PATCH v1 net 03/11] af_unix: Stop recv(MSG_PEEK) at consumed OOB skb Paolo Abeni
2024-06-26 21:10     ` Paolo Abeni
2024-06-26 21:47       ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-27 10:04         ` Paolo Abeni
2024-07-06  9:38       ` Rao Shoaib
2024-06-25  1:36 ` [PATCH v1 net 04/11] af_unix: Don't stop recv(MSG_DONTWAIT) if consumed OOB skb is at the head Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-25  1:36 ` [PATCH v1 net 05/11] selftest: af_unix: Add non-TCP-compliant test cases in msg_oob.c Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-25  1:36 ` [PATCH v1 net 06/11] af_unix: Don't stop recv() at consumed ex-OOB skb Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-25  1:36 ` [PATCH v1 net 07/11] selftest: af_unix: Add SO_OOBINLINE test cases in msg_oob.c Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-25  1:36 ` [PATCH v1 net 08/11] selftest: af_unix: Check SIGURG after every send() " Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-25  1:36 ` [PATCH v1 net 09/11] selftest: af_unix: Check EPOLLPRI after every send()/recv() " Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-25  1:36 ` [PATCH v1 net 10/11] af_unix: Fix wrong ioctl(SIOCATMARK) when consumed OOB skb is at the head Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-25  1:36 ` [PATCH v1 net 11/11] selftest: af_unix: Check SIOCATMARK after every send()/recv() in msg_oob.c Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-26  0:43 ` [PATCH v1 net 00/11] af_unix: Fix bunch of MSG_OOB bugs and add new tests Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-26  1:31   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-27 10:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240625013645.45034-4-kuniyu@amazon.com \
    --to=kuniyu@amazon.com \
    --cc=Rao.Shoaib@oracle.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).