From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (relay1-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9A9D175AA; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 06:52:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.193 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719384766; cv=none; b=Zwslq3bTl+x0gD56qkTkkyF6FRkwxPkAdvP4F+jcu2nQqdIOPOB8j7r+ua7Avld6KfTZf8IPB6aCoJSmOc6efPKGDuki70WYCkdpdHpO8TzMvI33Kz+dbGIOi61/xUzo09NYazR2IO7zwCL07lCUXPEnkJD+v08CFjMpJAnlclM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719384766; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fRE5P6PE82Xq4+23ZFjntwgar6QxyjYP8r3Y+M4Da1s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=UuqGsSX7iGeUlObV0wbMbkrKnreGxjLwCD4wFWukrINEtm9fZ1vgyHVc5i2m94/BJ9RI+wLGISdmYEyuhZWkoZzVvYW5DpsEXQhRgBGf9j1JDk+ntfjGWL/idcEgVqTXB5xItauj+VulxOFAUYOpgnIAxS2JV/yEnWA4Fua+x7A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=kkRAU5Ye; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.193 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="kkRAU5Ye" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0524D24000B; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 06:52:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1719384761; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=X82V2P8TKJ6I8usLvjtNSyZFMJxGfnoq2XWLZLGMyXM=; b=kkRAU5YeXHUASh1bGiT5FERp3Mx6h6xd8Tc4Mx4MSS7GL7twUqycQ10OUYsbXOI5iLVt2A oUsne71Ia20lVvneuq9SgEBi3IBQvU7IWePE6zj9CMk4dCBtiQK4Wi38sSqQjRipBddKzG JqFr/hWpMgWo+wxNU8LPTdvd1dro/7ifG2q2RuHbmAj6D1GvdAfqX0lSWd1RxR//WUmB6z AZw0F1y+N3yYzZ79Sss3rr1Bnv4vrLQ9ygC9J9f6CAxWDIwuyuUtTWVKlBOVPkgBPNSBgO XsarOwoOA/v6b6o0GHf/SOJx8GhrAVHHHhpvJU5glbWkJsLYhW0sqRnd3B5Bng== Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 08:52:36 +0200 From: Herve Codina To: Steen Hegelund Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Andy Shevchenko , Simon Horman , Sai Krishna Gajula , Thomas Gleixner , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Lee Jones , Arnd Bergmann , Horatiu Vultur , , Andrew Lunn , Heiner Kallweit , Russell King , Saravana Kannan , "Bjorn Helgaas" , Philipp Zabel , "Lars Povlsen" , Daniel Machon , Alexandre Belloni , , , , , , "Allan Nielsen" , Luca Ceresoli , Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 18/19] mfd: Add support for LAN966x PCI device Message-ID: <20240626085236.62e61723@bootlin.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20240621184923.GA1398370@bhelgaas> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.2.0 (GTK 3.24.41; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-GND-Sasl: herve.codina@bootlin.com Hi Steen, Bjorn, Andy, On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 13:46:32 +0200 Steen Hegelund wrote: > Hi Bjorn, > > I am not sure what went wrong here. > > I have seen that lspci lists 'Microchip / SMSC' for the 0x1055 Vendor > ID value and as mentioned previously there has been a number of > aquicisions over the years, so that the ID has been absorbed but not > necessarily re-registered. > > Anyway I have started an investigation, so we can determine what > up/down in this. > > I agree that for now this will have to be PCI_VENDOR_ID_EFAR, and I > will return with an update as soon as I know more. > Right, PCI_VENDOR_ID_EFAR will be directly used in the next iteration. Best regards, Hervé