From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, andrew@lunn.ch, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com, mengyuanlou@net-swift.com,
duanqiangwen@net-swift.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/2] net: txgbe: remove separate irq request for MSI and INTx
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 16:41:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240627164138.725aa957@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240626060703.31652-2-jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>
On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 14:07:02 +0800 Jiawen Wu wrote:
> When using MSI or INTx interrupts, request_irq() for pdev->irq will
> conflict with request_threaded_irq() for txgbe->misc.irq, to cause
> system crash. So remove txgbe_request_irq() for MSI/INTx case, and
> rename txgbe_request_msix_irqs() since it only request for queue irqs.
Do you have any users who need INTx support? Maybe you could drop
the support and simplify the code?
> Fixes: aefd013624a1 ("net: txgbe: use irq_domain for interrupt controller")
> Signed-off-by: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_lib.c | 3 +-
> .../net/ethernet/wangxun/txgbe/txgbe_irq.c | 78 ++-----------------
> .../net/ethernet/wangxun/txgbe/txgbe_irq.h | 2 +-
> .../net/ethernet/wangxun/txgbe/txgbe_main.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_lib.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_lib.c
> index 68bde91b67a0..99f55a3573c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_lib.c
> @@ -1996,7 +1996,8 @@ void wx_free_irq(struct wx *wx)
> int vector;
>
> if (!(pdev->msix_enabled)) {
> - free_irq(pdev->irq, wx);
> + if (wx->mac.type == wx_mac_em)
> + free_irq(pdev->irq, wx);
It seems strange to match on type to decide whether to free an IRQ.
Isn't there or shouldn't there be some IRQ related flag informing
the library how to manage the IRQs?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-27 23:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-26 6:07 [PATCH net v2 0/2] net: txgbe: fix MSI and INTx interrupts Jiawen Wu
2024-06-26 6:07 ` [PATCH net v2 1/2] net: txgbe: remove separate irq request for MSI and INTx Jiawen Wu
2024-06-27 23:41 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-06-28 1:47 ` Jiawen Wu
2024-06-26 6:07 ` [PATCH net v2 2/2] net/txgbe: add extra handle for MSI/INTx into thread irq handle Jiawen Wu
2024-06-27 23:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-28 2:16 ` Jiawen Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240627164138.725aa957@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=duanqiangwen@net-swift.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jiawenwu@trustnetic.com \
--cc=mengyuanlou@net-swift.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).