From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D85AD1459E8; Fri, 5 Jul 2024 13:53:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720187599; cv=none; b=CFelfRbC1cSDefVfm/C2HDqo53t9O+Nn0mF6sPbO3AXLOvGwrT7EyOjMEaH/g/2s5m7eM/8dXTu3o4g7lCFWmuP9+8JnWkZwaMXk0UwH/mXZmpIR3BuHjcX/hMxkpSS1Dtqj4fDZGXvlB8y9+/BGwJHBULjlQfFyUcBtYYZ+280= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720187599; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iBo2NAMKixoHqt5brl0uZYpx2bTHZNyB5uFZzugwEy8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZuzvG2z2ndPUieUJfGxVtlNBLLlRFJxH8EpX9LaGWFoZ6kAcSKraneEYKRD8HfjWAogifhko7nZ1hLg9CvTAnCN6BTaQkCKBP6TMNegdO1MO5HB5e02YM/4Tk+Ly6tnXHvc5VU7ofLZ4Sypqc/lfj2fiuyLPu58XwoqJO4qzZHc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=f8FXjAu5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="f8FXjAu5" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE4A3C116B1; Fri, 5 Jul 2024 13:53:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1720187598; bh=iBo2NAMKixoHqt5brl0uZYpx2bTHZNyB5uFZzugwEy8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=f8FXjAu56BtjY10grqgpqfpORdCuT2fjGTzg3au6vdXaECIIlBU8noeHMrvI4+HRX uZWM0dwiYiiuQctbLftxLXFu9qI3p1AKRuekQTtm8PpFUQpiwHWIfUArTetFhNTR6X X+bpyfFbtlihRnnikyYLm3K83/DIACrykV6meSCTEFuuhLz0P3T8WcVFHL6Z63h9n3 qzBd9p0bSGDv8lNSC0msELTeF+4PGwttQEgpb7li/nNSUMKKrcuCV2dijWq0g8Pbau wW/VqVm3hKw2yWV9AwE2JsCmb/woQfaH4owYkXzJJCM3tmQ+V086wiyedN2r9jfjIX 0xMARLrC9IjMw== Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 06:53:16 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Aaron Conole Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, dev@openvswitch.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pravin B Shelar , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Shuah Khan , =?UTF-8?B?QWRyacOhbg==?= Moreno , Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] selftests: openvswitch: Address some flakes in the CI environment Message-ID: <20240705065316.6886f2ba@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20240702132830.213384-1-aconole@redhat.com> <20240705062851.36694176@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 05 Jul 2024 09:49:12 -0400 Aaron Conole wrote: > > The results look solid on normal builds now, but with a debug kernel > > the test is failing consistently: > > > > https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/contest.html?executor=vmksft-net-dbg&test=openvswitch-sh > > Yes - it shows a test case issue with the upcall and psample tests. > > Adrian and I discussed the correct approach would be using a wait_for > instead of just sleeping, because it seems the dbg environment might be > too racy. I think he is working on a follow up to submit after the > psample work gets merged - we were hoping not to hold that patch series > up with more potential conflicts or merge issues if that's okay. Makes sense, thanks!