netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Ricardo B. Marliere" <ricardo@marliere.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	lvc-project@linuxtesting.org,
	syzbot+ec0723ba9605678b14bf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] ppp: reject claimed-as-LCP but actually malformed packets
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 09:30:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240709083012.GD346094@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240708115615.134770-1-dmantipov@yandex.ru>

+ Guillaume, Jakub

On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 02:56:15PM +0300, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
> Since 'ppp_async_encode()' assumes valid LCP packets (with code
> from 1 to 7 inclusive), add 'ppp_check_packet()' to ensure that
> LCP packet has an actual body beyond PPP_LCP header bytes, and
> reject claimed-as-LCP but actually malformed data otherwise.
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+ec0723ba9605678b14bf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=ec0723ba9605678b14bf
> Fixes: 44073187990d ("ppp: ensure minimum packet size in ppp_write()")

Sorry for not noticing this earlier.

I think that the cited commit is not where this problem was introduced.
What that commit does is to introduce a length check.
And what this patch does is to add another, more specific length check.
But the problem fixed by this patch existed before the cited commit.

I expect that, like the cited commit, this patch:

Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")

> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru>
> ---
> v2: style, comments, and metadata adjustments suggested by Simon Horman

Thanks, other than the Fixes tag, this looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>

...

  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-09  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-05 16:08 [PATCH] net: ppp: reject claimed-as-LCP but actually malformed packets Dmitry Antipov
2024-07-06  9:35 ` Simon Horman
2024-07-08 11:56   ` [PATCH net v2] " Dmitry Antipov
2024-07-09  8:30     ` Simon Horman [this message]
2024-07-11  8:41       ` Paolo Abeni
2024-07-11  9:30     ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240709083012.GD346094@kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dmantipov@yandex.ru \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gnault@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lvc-project@linuxtesting.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=ricardo@marliere.net \
    --cc=syzbot+ec0723ba9605678b14bf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).