netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	keescook@chromium.org,
	nex.sw.ncis.osdt.itp.upstreaming@intel.com,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	"open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] netdevice: define and allocate &net_device _properly_
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 19:11:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240709181128.GO346094@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240709125433.4026177-1-leitao@debian.org>

On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 05:54:25AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
> 
> In fact, this structure contains a flexible array at the end, but
> historically its size, alignment etc., is calculated manually.
> There are several instances of the structure embedded into other
> structures, but also there's ongoing effort to remove them and we
> could in the meantime declare &net_device properly.
> Declare the array explicitly, use struct_size() and store the array
> size inside the structure, so that __counted_by() can be applied.
> Don't use PTR_ALIGN(), as SLUB itself tries its best to ensure the
> allocated buffer is aligned to what the user expects.
> Also, change its alignment from %NETDEV_ALIGN to the cacheline size
> as per several suggestions on the netdev ML.
> 
> bloat-o-meter for vmlinux:
> 
> free_netdev                                  445     440      -5
> netdev_freemem                                24       -     -24
> alloc_netdev_mqs                            1481    1450     -31
> 
> On x86_64 with several NICs of different vendors, I was never able to
> get a &net_device pointer not aligned to the cacheline size after the
> change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
> Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>

Hi Breno,

Some kernel doc warnings from my side.

Flagged by: kernel-doc -none

> ---
> Changelog:
> 
> v2:
>  * Rebased Alexander's patch on top of f750dfe825b90 ("ethtool: provide
>    customized dim profile management").
>  * Removed the ALIGN() of SMP_CACHE_BYTES for sizeof_priv.
> 
> v1:
>  * https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/90fd7cd7-72dc-4df6-88ec-fbc8b64735ad@intel.com
> 
>  include/linux/netdevice.h | 12 +++++++-----
>  net/core/dev.c            | 30 ++++++------------------------
>  net/core/net-sysfs.c      |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index 93558645c6d0..f0dd499244d4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -2199,10 +2199,10 @@ struct net_device {
>  	unsigned short		neigh_priv_len;
>  	unsigned short          dev_id;
>  	unsigned short          dev_port;
> -	unsigned short		padded;

padded should also be removed from the Kernel doc for this structure.

> +	int			irq;
> +	u32			priv_len;

And irq and priv_len should be added to the Kernel doc for this structure.

>  
>  	spinlock_t		addr_list_lock;
> -	int			irq;
>  
>  	struct netdev_hw_addr_list	uc;
>  	struct netdev_hw_addr_list	mc;

...

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-09 18:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-09 12:54 [PATCH net-next v2] netdevice: define and allocate &net_device _properly_ Breno Leitao
2024-07-09 15:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-07-09 20:22   ` Breno Leitao
2024-07-10 11:19   ` Breno Leitao
2024-07-10 17:04     ` Eric Dumazet
2024-07-11 12:54       ` Alexander Lobakin
2024-07-11 15:41         ` Eric Dumazet
2024-07-09 16:02 ` Kees Cook
2024-07-09 18:11 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2024-07-09 20:19   ` Breno Leitao
2024-07-09 20:37     ` Kees Cook
2024-07-10  7:27     ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240709181128.GO346094@kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nex.sw.ncis.osdt.itp.upstreaming@intel.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).