From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
keescook@chromium.org,
nex.sw.ncis.osdt.itp.upstreaming@intel.com,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] netdevice: define and allocate &net_device _properly_
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 19:11:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240709181128.GO346094@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240709125433.4026177-1-leitao@debian.org>
On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 05:54:25AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
>
> In fact, this structure contains a flexible array at the end, but
> historically its size, alignment etc., is calculated manually.
> There are several instances of the structure embedded into other
> structures, but also there's ongoing effort to remove them and we
> could in the meantime declare &net_device properly.
> Declare the array explicitly, use struct_size() and store the array
> size inside the structure, so that __counted_by() can be applied.
> Don't use PTR_ALIGN(), as SLUB itself tries its best to ensure the
> allocated buffer is aligned to what the user expects.
> Also, change its alignment from %NETDEV_ALIGN to the cacheline size
> as per several suggestions on the netdev ML.
>
> bloat-o-meter for vmlinux:
>
> free_netdev 445 440 -5
> netdev_freemem 24 - -24
> alloc_netdev_mqs 1481 1450 -31
>
> On x86_64 with several NICs of different vendors, I was never able to
> get a &net_device pointer not aligned to the cacheline size after the
> change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
> Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
Hi Breno,
Some kernel doc warnings from my side.
Flagged by: kernel-doc -none
> ---
> Changelog:
>
> v2:
> * Rebased Alexander's patch on top of f750dfe825b90 ("ethtool: provide
> customized dim profile management").
> * Removed the ALIGN() of SMP_CACHE_BYTES for sizeof_priv.
>
> v1:
> * https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/90fd7cd7-72dc-4df6-88ec-fbc8b64735ad@intel.com
>
> include/linux/netdevice.h | 12 +++++++-----
> net/core/dev.c | 30 ++++++------------------------
> net/core/net-sysfs.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index 93558645c6d0..f0dd499244d4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -2199,10 +2199,10 @@ struct net_device {
> unsigned short neigh_priv_len;
> unsigned short dev_id;
> unsigned short dev_port;
> - unsigned short padded;
padded should also be removed from the Kernel doc for this structure.
> + int irq;
> + u32 priv_len;
And irq and priv_len should be added to the Kernel doc for this structure.
>
> spinlock_t addr_list_lock;
> - int irq;
>
> struct netdev_hw_addr_list uc;
> struct netdev_hw_addr_list mc;
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-09 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-09 12:54 [PATCH net-next v2] netdevice: define and allocate &net_device _properly_ Breno Leitao
2024-07-09 15:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-07-09 20:22 ` Breno Leitao
2024-07-10 11:19 ` Breno Leitao
2024-07-10 17:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-07-11 12:54 ` Alexander Lobakin
2024-07-11 15:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-07-09 16:02 ` Kees Cook
2024-07-09 18:11 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2024-07-09 20:19 ` Breno Leitao
2024-07-09 20:37 ` Kees Cook
2024-07-10 7:27 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240709181128.GO346094@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nex.sw.ncis.osdt.itp.upstreaming@intel.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).