From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBE5F847B for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 01:54:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720576486; cv=none; b=NCo4WUh8435a41LFp0NvV0FAf2BkRUvvaN9RpBXJdYwBi60SD85epx27blYzkX9xg/ekLzZZ8+Dwb8PuIPhgpKBA7uJMYZ/AGCsLcci0zXk7fnLcrReiehwjHU8bH1msZdV6WDbFKgPp77wBufIuRI2fcz6aJ35ZMHq4VsjXGTI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720576486; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UGnVGxZQ8nYQY1oFLxyjAceG1xm1icohkQgVn2LQKgM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=OgOC+I1QE/tWnwmBwAUKZ5TzYZ3xAKy5nPPi54M2L7REUNqsukTHKYK8Ih+H+Uf0VhGNnHD24u0tWlZBSvJEoeFt0aVEa9UeXBAvAOqsUpjyghmfgVA586BKTcpssKDg9ZC59xcajhaI4gjdT5h52n0jtPXGPFJd3rkK7B12us8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=UVOmkdAJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="UVOmkdAJ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C6617C3277B; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 01:54:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1720576486; bh=UGnVGxZQ8nYQY1oFLxyjAceG1xm1icohkQgVn2LQKgM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UVOmkdAJrH3BKBtVr4sA1yP040Jdgt6mzOu6D0cHh8WLd7wawHELsj2BmaLcwgwVZ 8CfeyOjfxWpHTd2xKFJ7KVSHsI+tfwiKjJS73XQ9tUssPGg1QWXIOreU3G9xLUDpDC Rxt+88xmjCefSjxC7THxOZcXQBbGmIfuwm6GHfKLvAWSmG2IuLCDmHh0a8qgsIb3R2 Tty1QE58DwVNsPhd/sIzsthx9ACqIdwddgXv1DH5fJu+ZB4gdFncwsYtrPdpDf3yWo CrKHWNcsIWPn9kp3sl4Tcfov0yvzk7xtB7DEHlz51URjakg8m+fGtQlb7JLqJIX7+G wIoyY21i/amGg== Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 18:54:44 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Tariq Toukan Cc: "David S. Miller" , Paolo Abeni , Eric Dumazet , , Saeed Mahameed , Gal Pressman , Leon Romanovsky , Daniel Jurgens , William Tu Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 01/10] net/mlx5: IFC updates for SF max IO EQs Message-ID: <20240709185444.6ac9f178@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20240708080025.1593555-2-tariqt@nvidia.com> References: <20240708080025.1593555-1-tariqt@nvidia.com> <20240708080025.1593555-2-tariqt@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 8 Jul 2024 11:00:16 +0300 Tariq Toukan wrote: > From: Daniel Jurgens > > Expose a new cap sf_eq_usage. The vhca_resource_manager can write this > cap, indicating the SF driver should use max_num_eqs_24b to determine > how many EQs to use. How does vhca_resource_manager write this cap?