From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-fw-80007.amazon.com (smtp-fw-80007.amazon.com [99.78.197.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F56C1B86D6 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 01:45:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=99.78.197.218 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720575913; cv=none; b=AV3YZIPl7TJv4kYddGwXvqu8o1c+Q52Pm7quhUjEzg84DGnjjVTs42PBxJCAO+R9sV3r/DMLGaDPJmtNMhdCYMIJ5QDf0PEPOLAZX79CVyuEcdbUALB+upD3csrw0USUt6nOsfzfrTyLSOMZKfqpgI00gh2dQCFymqW3jmdAMxE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720575913; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UCOfeXPXq2unUG3L6J6wgxV7YhnU162QH+AR5rbRyGk=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=gOScBifIY9PSBi+evcO7ay1DWzRWPtG6zmkf/cOIQK3MLHytHCj0sJ5abDrsg0CgboSvWQMPgQL0thNEu2D0PwlPAGhr3ulKYIlhqb617If9LMXpFnw9U/rcs/tZVtpOeGr9GXSkmWYwiKhTF7vySjv2hBJ+wbBivpD+n3ZEZuA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=amazon.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=amazon.co.jp; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazon.com header.i=@amazon.com header.b=Nrk4CO5/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=99.78.197.218 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=amazon.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=amazon.co.jp Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazon.com header.i=@amazon.com header.b="Nrk4CO5/" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amazon.com; i=@amazon.com; q=dns/txt; s=amazon201209; t=1720575913; x=1752111913; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=D65hz3P+rllqNQr8hzbekEN6F3JT+oUIUQutOZo86kE=; b=Nrk4CO5/ZFcEYXOrIbSEeqDFinxzh3pj/kAeDkgJVjspWtyvXsgVZ2+S xRquW+yy76uZ8K42L8Yu6rOL4uAd3BZ0pcPSYp15YPy7uuvvHk5POh0pA jTou10ed7DzEyyPFl2F95sMcJp79Ef605dd+Pgd3J5MR1VfHEsKzPe23U U=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,196,1716249600"; d="scan'208";a="310207384" Received: from pdx4-co-svc-p1-lb2-vlan2.amazon.com (HELO smtpout.prod.us-west-2.prod.farcaster.email.amazon.dev) ([10.25.36.210]) by smtp-border-fw-80007.pdx80.corp.amazon.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Jul 2024 01:45:11 +0000 Received: from EX19MTAUWA002.ant.amazon.com [10.0.38.20:22483] by smtpin.naws.us-west-2.prod.farcaster.email.amazon.dev [10.0.36.52:2525] with esmtp (Farcaster) id f3b10c92-f3c1-4dad-b9d3-41e8d11056b0; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 01:45:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Farcaster-Flow-ID: f3b10c92-f3c1-4dad-b9d3-41e8d11056b0 Received: from EX19D004ANA001.ant.amazon.com (10.37.240.138) by EX19MTAUWA002.ant.amazon.com (10.250.64.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.2.1258.34; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 01:45:07 +0000 Received: from 88665a182662.ant.amazon.com (10.119.149.200) by EX19D004ANA001.ant.amazon.com (10.37.240.138) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.2.1258.34; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 01:45:04 +0000 From: Kuniyuki Iwashima To: CC: , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] tcp: Make simultaneous connect() RFC-compliant. Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 18:44:55 -0700 Message-ID: <20240710014456.77159-1-kuniyu@amazon.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 In-Reply-To: <20240709125209.71d02207@kernel.org> References: <20240709125209.71d02207@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-ClientProxiedBy: EX19D046UWA002.ant.amazon.com (10.13.139.39) To EX19D004ANA001.ant.amazon.com (10.37.240.138) From: Jakub Kicinski Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 12:52:09 -0700 > On Mon, 8 Jul 2024 11:08:50 -0700 Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote: > > * Add patch 2 > > Hi Kuniyuki! > > Looks like it also makes BPF CI fail. All of these: > https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/contest.html?branch=net-next-2024-07-09--15-00&executor=gh-bpf-ci&pw-n=0 > But it builds down to the reuseport test on various platforms. Oh, thanks for catching! It seems the test is using TFO, and somehow fastopen_rsk is cleared, but a packet is processed later in SYN_RECV state... Will look into it.