From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D19B7C133; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 02:01:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720663260; cv=none; b=gssIyiwk08GKqjI3k29+6crsRJgQL3Mde6F5GkmzegqPlXsf5JIwiXY3DC4br1XqRE4MW1BJYfYvXZN/+vDIGpfQmlW1X3S83lW2bK6SE/Yd69ANpOq+PdVbJ5DKcGqyxCk0hvirZH7CKQbrfAsr947+MI5JTrUl7FcXwO70RUE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720663260; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MZSepU52lrRYbEv6ZHYa+JgA3kjNQlhs4kD+umitfmE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=T+1eYZAJDlmYw5AiZhmBVfQERxl5E2CHI6HuE4H9E6ICcUsNdBpCj7YYh8cfFv2WyKQJy7NfGNpuDdNzifAejg0Kjpe/SsCrSKPKQ+W+CQmbrqo/EnXMTaVVV7Jna/OUi0VnRk3DNJ0qgJnwIHHWEHH9sPLVDGy/cOMdcV9/LzE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=hjH2SJsS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="hjH2SJsS" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3854CC32781; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 02:01:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1720663260; bh=MZSepU52lrRYbEv6ZHYa+JgA3kjNQlhs4kD+umitfmE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=hjH2SJsSooZscEaOdziOEK+qw8Eh7PD8vZIDF6sXi1b5JLV4R6chJQaesXO/3SkOO mmV/5GD+tnQS1vaAcLVlQeeQmTHapScHnAo8bbanoUVxnsVA4fTxQ65Q6kvASh4cTK LqU/stt9kR80rKJKk8hs/ekZxnOtffIWLnlhcKl0CEquXQk2OEl74qBeuYhWuUqn4O nBlliKlIW6Ufjw+p8BsoE31aSFaeTfZJYdLFi7D7AsbQ7iqB5b+N9D6zH7s1HdIWca C1j8GmgbLxBNmKHrW4t3W5FWLJyb6axpUNoUaP59ax3CVIgxRyel2FD4ew1pT1wn4Z g95GSXnp+pYEA== Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 19:00:59 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Stefano Garzarella Cc: Peng Fan , "Peng Fan (OSS)" , "virtualization@lists.linux.dev" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] test/vsock: add install target Message-ID: <20240710190059.06f01a4c@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20240709135051.3152502-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 13:58:39 +0200 Stefano Garzarella wrote: > There is a comment there: > > # Avoid changing the rest of the logic here and lib.mk. > > Added by commit 17eac6c2db8b2cdfe33d40229bdda2acd86b304a. > > IIUC they re-used INSTALL_PATH, just to avoid too many changes in that > file and in tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk > > So, IMHO we should not care about it and only use VSOCK_INSTALL_PATH if > you don't want to conflict with INSTALL_PATH. Any reason why vsock isn't part of selftests in the first place?