From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3E118F77 for ; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 07:17:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722151073; cv=none; b=mI9DJyGM/+MTMQ0f52kl/nxYE6VFYcv13jGUZ4TDHdHN8o5KDKlU9iesELSZyEGlCsqUmydyICoXNvt+CSHvubX0qZg1+5L/w32b0Ohbr5tr2tHi1xJU2LVvXvZgRnzWXXMTGHeupMh89vEkLPDb/1U0VvSM709rHrW/1AhXLCM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722151073; c=relaxed/simple; bh=L/vP++2fNxukTqTPfdVfAtZlBGmhZnx20GXKKd9M1nI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=hPi0ee8MtcqTOwHeBAlZ5uaY1m3Vad1LG1BrgfKhyaDcjh4tlrY7W1BlJ9PUjUHIkYlb820V4tZwRTf+d1d2asMVj2d+pBi2BfD4EGUbYBJ+9SgzvruDkj62TBonlV3br4oS4EntIlIJ/POMBDUdBGc6c7aOfwE2vSBpJU160H4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=LcpeouRE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="LcpeouRE" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA72CC116B1; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 07:17:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1722151073; bh=L/vP++2fNxukTqTPfdVfAtZlBGmhZnx20GXKKd9M1nI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=LcpeouREalGwXicLKnZHXB+7RYX6bcWcqwzIOBYA/XSZQDc04sf2n/9VfQ/sF9WmI 2tMtMj0E8bOMPUawyOAodBh5u9pMFw5Dl/u7cEePS6t8WrXB+PNj5/W7G58UoqxP4T MU78FkxXg7V2Pg/yWm8ZMXnWwSzINMK4tiuICWGrnIJwCncpKxtoT/sQClYrKogaWK a8qJbC03euAdA5yj64UtS4YuLh9kpQGVpoWYuBgiejF6o3Uvq760f1QqqptYOab2nE 6U0Ani/eOsc01KTi0p8xFijNUma+/ah+Z5X9ygLhCHvnwE8+6tq/1NoDzsNtxdk5bN 3rcb6tbe6lSOA== Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2024 08:17:46 +0100 From: Simon Horman To: Patrick Rohr Cc: "David S. Miller" , Linux Network Development Mailing List , Maciej =?utf-8?Q?=C5=BBenczykowski?= , Lorenzo Colitti , David Lamparter Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] Add support for PIO p flag Message-ID: <20240728071746.GB1625564@kernel.org> References: <20240726010629.111077-1-prohr@google.com> <20240726102318.GN97837@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20240726102318.GN97837@kernel.org> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 11:23:18AM +0100, Simon Horman wrote: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 06:06:29PM -0700, Patrick Rohr wrote: > > draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag is adding a new flag to the Prefix Information > > Option to signal the pd-per-device addressing mechanism. > > > > When accept_pio_pflag is enabled, the presence of the p-flag will cause > > an a flag in the same PIO to be ignored. > > > > An automated test has been added in Android (r.android.com/3195335) to > > go along with this change. > > > > Cc: Maciej Żenczykowski > > Cc: Lorenzo Colitti > > Cc: David Lamparter > > Signed-off-by: Patrick Rohr > > Hi Patrick, > > This is not a full review, and as per the form letter below, > net-next is closed, so you'd be best to repost. > But I will offer some very minor review in the meantime. > > Firstly, please seed the CC list for Networking patches > using get_maintainers.pl --git-min-percent 25 this.patch > > Secondly, as noted inline, there are two cases of > mixed of tabs and spaces used for indenting in this patch. > > ## Form letter - net-next-closed > > The merge window for v6.11 has begun and therefore net-next is closed > for new drivers, features, code refactoring and optimizations. > We are currently accepting bug fixes only. > > Please repost when net-next reopens after 15th July Sorry, I'm not sure why I wrote the 15th, I meant the 29th. > > RFC patches sent for review only are welcome at any time. > > See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#development-cycle ...