From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DB0E1BC08E; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 14:43:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722437033; cv=none; b=esRKYpuM+OoH12rKfqoVH2w9+KdLSYA2PqV9ynZomoDbctyDT5yV1bBREOH4lIuvYVEixvwaRlalq0mX3TcEMECj3EtTsYCZvB8dNHptzmzlfXzLKQlsPd1fljvXSL+1bIFUc5WdpBbTFQIMoQPlRSZqw/aIsaqoPcyotSxNxdU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722437033; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3uUQgB9NsO6QdRwnKkBcuAS4ZDSgOduuYPCnxlW5Kvk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=d3Pt37aSchfHuMPXiQ6T3JrxP0FTqVzc4PcD/prNQ28LMjz+EXy2x+dRxarNKPOUHRFO/nP8YfsjBIbqwqf25qWVKVZZYeNX3PTtbkr+nW529S2Tqf5CrMKgrzvysvALMFWgyNF2YD+iM4ZmkOvshWDlPKSJcZ4pUZV6b04u/a8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=leb7xbLf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="leb7xbLf" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52E59C116B1; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 14:43:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1722437033; bh=3uUQgB9NsO6QdRwnKkBcuAS4ZDSgOduuYPCnxlW5Kvk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=leb7xbLfru8tcQpwEZwAOOdUFIGDCp1thq7gTY1UcBFWmAZWS4lKpf3jdfAlD7efh 5cdQcAU64khHHAIqGb1Hh9D7++C+qWjbPxBaMwbyxeWg+dE9O34nIPBJ51+RmCN2Vt zCUU4TYVoVpRerchg3Nm8zCx+a1mQ+UZH3P9Rz28ITevglLMFg56obR1McDMqu7N2v fTQvhxOWm/34xmqfN2MVe/EdYr08QSFjkaxGPFQUUJNeZGdgMNBTPAjs62fytClG+S 1VEAomVL/gf/nNsiX2t0KuW6YmV5vfuYnlxMDmeXunBhwMPsDpIueHhDozX4kFGoGG ldPbmLW5yoeAQ== Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 07:43:51 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: "Song, Yoong Siang" Cc: "Nguyen, Anthony L" , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Richard Cochran , "Alexei Starovoitov" , Daniel Borkmann , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , John Fastabend , "Gomes, Vinicius" , Jonathan Corbet , "Kitszel, Przemyslaw" , Shinas Rasheed , "Tian, Kevin" , Brett Creeley , "Blanco Alcaine, Hector" , "Hay, Joshua A" , "Neftin, Sasha" , "intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "bpf@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next,v1 0/3] Add Default Rx Queue Setting for igc driver Message-ID: <20240731074351.13676228@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20240730012212.775814-1-yoong.siang.song@intel.com> <20240730075507.7cf8741f@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 07:40:11 +0000 Song, Yoong Siang wrote: > Regarding your suggestion of implementing a "wildcard rule," > are you suggesting the use of an ethtool command similar to the following? > > ethtool -U flow-type ether action > > I have a concern that users might be not aware that this nfc rule is having lowest priority, > as the default queue would only take effect when no other filtering rules match. I believe that ethtool n-tuple rules are expected to be executed in order. User can use the 'loc' argument to place the rule at the end of the table. > Do you see this as a potential issue? If not, I am willing to proceed with > exploring the ethtool options you've mentioned.