From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Praveen Kaligineedi <pkaligineedi@google.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, willemb@google.com,
jeroendb@google.com, shailend@google.com, hramamurthy@google.com,
jfraker@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] gve: Fix use of netif_carrier_ok()
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 13:33:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240802123303.GC2503418@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240801205619.987396-1-pkaligineedi@google.com>
On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 01:56:19PM -0700, Praveen Kaligineedi wrote:
> GVE driver wrongly relies on netif_carrier_ok() to check the
> interface administrative state when resources are being
> allocated/deallocated for queue(s). netif_carrier_ok() needs
> to be replaced with netif_running() for all such cases.
>
> Administrative state is the result of "ip link set dev <dev>
> up/down". It reflects whether the administrator wants to use
> the device for traffic and the corresponding resources have
> been allocated.
>
> Fixes: 5f08cd3d6423 ("gve: Alloc before freeing when adjusting queues")
> Signed-off-by: Praveen Kaligineedi <pkaligineedi@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Shailend Chand <shailend@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
...
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_main.c
...
> @@ -1847,7 +1847,7 @@ int gve_adjust_queues(struct gve_priv *priv,
> rx_alloc_cfg.qcfg = &new_rx_config;
> tx_alloc_cfg.num_rings = new_tx_config.num_queues;
>
> - if (netif_carrier_ok(priv->dev)) {
> + if (netif_running(priv->dev)) {
> err = gve_adjust_config(priv, &tx_alloc_cfg, &rx_alloc_cfg);
> return err;
> }
Hi Praveen,
Not for this patch, but I am curious to know if this check is needed at
all, because gve_adjust_queues only seems to be called from
gve_set_channels if netif_running() (previously netif_carrier_ok()) is true
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-02 12:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-01 20:56 [PATCH net] gve: Fix use of netif_carrier_ok() Praveen Kaligineedi
2024-08-02 12:33 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2024-08-02 16:24 ` Praveen Kaligineedi
2024-08-03 0:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240802123303.GC2503418@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hramamurthy@google.com \
--cc=jeroendb@google.com \
--cc=jfraker@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pkaligineedi@google.com \
--cc=shailend@google.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).