From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DBAA380 for ; Sat, 3 Aug 2024 00:38:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722645501; cv=none; b=Zn7fHzus9KzmaZPPtKBqvHjj46XCK2eq8r1gLPmmMgP0uR/U8EexK9NaFj7UrDLn7AfP9cv6Vm5GKsM5YBM0WWGceY37PPb+FSmX/SC2+IVQb799FXjaV6W1XPUEm9/Q0hBKKA4Kx3Rp5boN9BNggCIxkpatASb4jRYebc5q1r8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722645501; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Ta+ZUXznjXU9N09+5dDO48gPUVR2yUVdotk8x9uYHxA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Ciu3rG+rFQgQLGC7Iauy/9fzGJX0gIpUFgNOnNZeYRo/YfMqrDO8/XNAWLPLcQNurVEPsfEbifR7ZRRJ5Kx4kmv96kuaxO0LnrtfYvYMaPGGm0CUWTQvOtmlQDuuGTsZEOaVRjQ5sTk36Hn3vPkNGJd6QzsVzjFpZlvOjqOergM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=YU/Xi2+H; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="YU/Xi2+H" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1722645498; x=1754181498; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Ta+ZUXznjXU9N09+5dDO48gPUVR2yUVdotk8x9uYHxA=; b=YU/Xi2+HfEJfji5LfPT6VSf0a0cuALocYn9FdwiwNRqxYmOXyORVSc9a 3mk+nar/xp48lglNdh0Z0LSQNM6eiEkEx3Qf2BLYkrG8ZtlAQ9XcN4C0d y/JiQJDaCqfIE92um3zZCpRNQK/d5ICAG8lf42Ul5lgRArb8/n/Yi8i6J M84TIMpJqQzxHv4wfBku561XSxqyySYQz2coIH8qnSSzu6Xr7hfOAzCvw nfrS2MyacVC2QCSIa1EM4K9GyBiC8opyqlQYWBkro8Y07koas543ruJEd AGev9rr+aJeBoJXwqh/3NORyKv20fcvCbUyuM5SbGzLFhFBzXO4WPE9c1 A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 2kzsoXEkTc6twuMIYxgpKA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: uzbcokCDQ4OxCCB6/Q3t2A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11152"; a="20852602" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,259,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="20852602" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by fmvoesa108.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Aug 2024 17:38:17 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: cSeISrtbR2iDamonOEKdtw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: h5qq0JQ8SiGrcn5lF0JVhg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,259,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="60572725" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 68891e0c336b) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Aug 2024 17:38:15 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 68891e0c336b with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1sa2mj-000xck-1k; Sat, 03 Aug 2024 00:38:13 +0000 Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 08:38:01 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Christian Hopps , devel@linux-ipsec.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Steffen Klassert , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Christian Hopps Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec-next v7 12/16] xfrm: iptfs: handle received fragmented inner packets Message-ID: <202408030834.THon2krt-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240801080314.169715-13-chopps@chopps.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240801080314.169715-13-chopps@chopps.org> Hi Christian, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on klassert-ipsec-next/master] [also build test WARNING on netfilter-nf/main linus/master v6.11-rc1 next-20240802] [cannot apply to klassert-ipsec/master nf-next/master] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Christian-Hopps/xfrm-config-add-CONFIG_XFRM_IPTFS/20240802-185628 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/klassert/ipsec-next.git master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240801080314.169715-13-chopps%40chopps.org patch subject: [PATCH ipsec-next v7 12/16] xfrm: iptfs: handle received fragmented inner packets config: alpha-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240803/202408030834.THon2krt-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.3.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240803/202408030834.THon2krt-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408030834.THon2krt-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:37: warning: expecting prototype for IP(). Prototype was for IPTFS_DEFAULT_DROP_TIME_USECS() instead net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:49: warning: bad line: net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:58: warning: expecting prototype for IP(). Prototype was for IPTFS_DEFAULT_INIT_DELAY_USECS() instead vim +37 net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c 26 27 /** 28 * IP-TFS default SA values (tunnel egress/dir-in) 29 * 30 * IPTFS_DEFAULT_DROP_TIME_USECS 31 * The default IPTFS drop time in microseconds. The drop time is the amount 32 * of time before a missing out-of-order IPTFS tunnel packet is considered 33 * lost. See also the reorder window. 34 * 35 * Default 1s (1000000). 36 */ > 37 #define IPTFS_DEFAULT_DROP_TIME_USECS (1000000000ull) /* 1s */ 38 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki