From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 566115BAF0; Tue, 6 Aug 2024 16:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722960179; cv=none; b=KCE28L8bnzXmFBMZujlP5p+KhxH30V9XARNg/5FwYL38JbT2j+a19L8IEgS3aquEhxTYEIdY3eYo/93/OYXKEapgm8ci6pssQ71I1u0/x2ECTUnr+bxa1bXtqL1NraGV0q7cwN6qExrROhbwxlVde4xJd6tko3omVSydGAI6R3Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722960179; c=relaxed/simple; bh=TzW0RlBqqnf0yvfs+npWBSjNiD/6KUFoSIWrNvneOq8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=eMe4nN4XceV+NR9+W5q4VO7t3rhhQOCb74rpCHd5KNYNxaOWRM3gvUyjPnJwAeDEMJp7u2ehokCvrxsEDQUgf3kHaW/rA4JEyzggg1GYuCq8OzXtS/JYdGJVRKMsQbxdU0NhkvqP0D/AvMhFUUamNkbdz4U7mXfICXjtGszLWGc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=kA0SOGOH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="kA0SOGOH" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD8B5C32786; Tue, 6 Aug 2024 16:02:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1722960179; bh=TzW0RlBqqnf0yvfs+npWBSjNiD/6KUFoSIWrNvneOq8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=kA0SOGOHJ+ykBZ54s0oFiLL2QjUzPYFjGwh9g5jWTi1Cx1t2qO0wO0jqTOxJEFdZl DmZZgOV3nANenJZw2ne1d+sHoIejT5ujqYItHPGw4cXiUuO3EDWEchUxp4StPExu88 8eeQqsOAO/qqivGSjgiLdgKZYH6SJfMtWS25G3FQExP1YQK1qr9TTYwrigPcdTV00J CjX/zlyUcT2vvusenuFS5EKo9qIJ83Z8U2Apw07mpIF5TjCCfblYku3sF+6pBk01uQ 87oAkQrpYzIA4bovv9hfcmJD/AfxylWJUCogkwHfCoNY7EXDgmbftOBnhjUBfEHDV3 PLQSMY90b1B4w== Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 09:02:57 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Stefano Garzarella Cc: luigi.leonardi@outlook.com, mst@redhat.com, Stefan Hajnoczi , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marco Pinna Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/2] vsock: avoid queuing on intermediate queue if possible Message-ID: <20240806090257.48724974@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20240730-pinna-v4-0-5c9179164db5@outlook.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 10:39:23 +0200 Stefano Garzarella wrote: > this series is marked as "Not Applicable" for the net-next tree: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20240730-pinna-v4-2-5c9179164db5@outlook.com/ > > Actually this is more about the virtio-vsock driver, so can you queue > this on your tree? We can revive it in our patchwork, too, if that's easier. Not entirely sure why it was discarded, seems borderline.