netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Liu Jian <liujian56@huawei.com>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jgg@ziepe.ca, leon@kernel.org, zyjzyj2000@gmail.com,
	wenjia@linux.ibm.com, jaka@linux.ibm.com,
	alibuda@linux.alibaba.com, tonylu@linux.alibaba.com,
	guwen@linux.alibaba.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] net/smc: use ib_device_get_netdev() helper to get netdev info
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 22:59:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240809145917.GB103152@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240809083148.1989912-3-liujian56@huawei.com>

On 2024-08-09 16:31:46, Liu Jian wrote:
>Currently, in the SMC protocol, network devices are obtained by calling
>ib_device_ops.get_netdev(). But for some drivers, this callback function
>is not implemented separately. Therefore, here I modified to use
>ib_device_get_netdev() to get net_device.
>
>For rdma devices that do not implement ib_device_ops.get_netdev(), one of
>the issues addressed is as follows:
>before:
>smcr device
>Net-Dev         IB-Dev   IB-P  IB-State  Type        Crit  #Links  PNET-ID
>                rxee        1    ACTIVE  0               No       0
>
>after:
>smcr device
>Net-Dev         IB-Dev   IB-P  IB-State  Type        Crit  #Links  PNET-ID
>enp1s0f1        rxee        1    ACTIVE  0               No       0
>
>Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <liujian56@huawei.com>
>---
> net/smc/smc_ib.c   | 8 +++-----
> net/smc/smc_pnet.c | 6 +-----
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/net/smc/smc_ib.c b/net/smc/smc_ib.c
>index 9297dc20bfe2..382351ac9434 100644
>--- a/net/smc/smc_ib.c
>+++ b/net/smc/smc_ib.c
>@@ -899,9 +899,7 @@ static void smc_copy_netdev_ifindex(struct smc_ib_device *smcibdev, int port)
> 	struct ib_device *ibdev = smcibdev->ibdev;
> 	struct net_device *ndev;
> 
>-	if (!ibdev->ops.get_netdev)
>-		return;
>-	ndev = ibdev->ops.get_netdev(ibdev, port + 1);
>+	ndev = ib_device_get_netdev(ibdev, port + 1);
> 	if (ndev) {
> 		smcibdev->ndev_ifidx[port] = ndev->ifindex;
> 		dev_put(ndev);
>@@ -921,9 +919,9 @@ void smc_ib_ndev_change(struct net_device *ndev, unsigned long event)
> 		port_cnt = smcibdev->ibdev->phys_port_cnt;
> 		for (i = 0; i < min_t(size_t, port_cnt, SMC_MAX_PORTS); i++) {
> 			libdev = smcibdev->ibdev;
>-			if (!libdev->ops.get_netdev)
>+			lndev = ib_device_get_netdev(libdev, i + 1);
>+			if (!lndev)
> 				continue;
>-			lndev = libdev->ops.get_netdev(libdev, i + 1);
> 			dev_put(lndev);
> 			if (lndev != ndev)
> 				continue;
>diff --git a/net/smc/smc_pnet.c b/net/smc/smc_pnet.c
>index 2adb92b8c469..a55a697a48de 100644
>--- a/net/smc/smc_pnet.c
>+++ b/net/smc/smc_pnet.c
>@@ -1055,11 +1055,7 @@ static void smc_pnet_find_rdma_dev(struct net_device *netdev,
> 			continue;
> 
> 		for (i = 1; i <= SMC_MAX_PORTS; i++) {
>-			if (!rdma_is_port_valid(ibdev->ibdev, i))
>-				continue;

Why remove this check ?

Best regard,
Dust


>-			if (!ibdev->ibdev->ops.get_netdev)
>-				continue;
>-			ndev = ibdev->ibdev->ops.get_netdev(ibdev->ibdev, i);
>+			ndev = ib_device_get_netdev(ibdev->ibdev, i);
> 			if (!ndev)
> 				continue;
> 			dev_put(ndev);
>-- 
>2.34.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-09 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-09  8:31 [PATCH net-next 0/4] Make SMC-R can work with rxe devices Liu Jian
2024-08-09  8:31 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] rdma/device: export ib_device_get_netdev() Liu Jian
2024-08-09  8:31 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] net/smc: use ib_device_get_netdev() helper to get netdev info Liu Jian
2024-08-09 14:59   ` Dust Li [this message]
2024-08-12  2:07     ` liujian (CE)
2024-08-12  2:43       ` Dust Li
2024-08-09  8:31 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] net/smc: fix one NULL pointer dereference in smc_ib_is_sg_need_sync() Liu Jian
2024-08-09 10:01   ` Wen Gu
2024-08-09 14:59   ` Dust Li
2024-08-12  3:30   ` D. Wythe
2024-08-09  8:31 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] RDMA/rxe: Set queue pair cur_qp_state when being queried Liu Jian
2024-08-09 11:06   ` Zhu Yanjun
2024-08-11  8:31     ` Leon Romanovsky
     [not found]       ` <bb0a5de8-f2d3-4276-ada4-f788f574b798@linux.dev>
2024-08-11 10:24         ` Zhu Yanjun
2024-08-11  6:05 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] Make SMC-R can work with rxe devices Jan Karcher
2024-08-20 13:16 ` Jan Karcher
2024-08-21  1:03   ` Dust Li
2024-08-24 10:04     ` liujian (CE)
2024-08-26 19:04       ` Jan Karcher
2024-08-28 10:29         ` liujian (CE)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240809145917.GB103152@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=jaka@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liujian56@huawei.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).