From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23BE21CD37; Sat, 10 Aug 2024 05:27:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723267677; cv=none; b=CU1Th26p4FYl+rlub7ihbAwxCiNhH893vGVz/dmvAibx42gLtIE2zAbJBAp63nMXT9IscwOr8Mm3stqBWh0El9m+3CWNxFkExpAHsUbZkVlzuAa8aQrY0PeiyqrmNUhUQmAehEP9waiDAEclDeOcUTR9KF5Y/fUwHBXiVR/b8HY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723267677; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZRyDFNQw4PzqYPlRuv+Xp4nfbpJTGDpyUfszoxFzitY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=cq9EdDX9vmfFiPtDhFhFWrtOw5+bp2VpnRjujnDBNwlpe9pXpPT3B2XuiHmZx6pmDhPuiWi1BTaDdVa3APcPL+y8omckLOH6HCNS1410meUPitnL2AEiB4OxzTLaZ64ai2zW+pPuvBkkla7O7XUQHXrvZaCxsZALBswWrJkJfMc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=XDxIMJTT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="XDxIMJTT" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3FA98C32781; Sat, 10 Aug 2024 05:27:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1723267676; bh=ZRyDFNQw4PzqYPlRuv+Xp4nfbpJTGDpyUfszoxFzitY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=XDxIMJTTPpde2Fqclki+uzj44wOmbBB6aUt/MgqqFDCdf3isnnq8dPp3sMKciCzFb FZZ+K/DWH4rce0GQCAkyN1zZd02DmM9w7WhqboSYNhrQ2kqEy5wiPZbf+hmvtYRKj3 P/z9sHyc/7S2mMiQk549D2eKF7tEsn0VPyKk+qnEYJsVo4yCyp8Xh89g9XV3W0zsRv JtsVH2wquK7gCHzOvSIIJwXfdTLMMve0lvv/y4QiR7nKfWgBSTFU/5Nuxd910tTBAm Ma5veOLyTmHDivQdKXH0IA50HInLwNMbyIoIXbiotSPWrIniY4tEVhoSgS1rVWYinJ BqSy4KQvChZ+Q== Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 22:27:55 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Alexander Lobakin Cc: "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , David Ahern , Xuan Zhuo , Andrew Lunn , Willem de Bruijn , nex.sw.ncis.osdt.itp.upstreaming@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/6] netdevice: convert private flags > BIT(31) to bitfields Message-ID: <20240809222755.28acd840@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20240808152757.2016725-2-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> References: <20240808152757.2016725-1-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> <20240808152757.2016725-2-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 17:27:52 +0200 Alexander Lobakin wrote: > + * @priv_flags_fast: both hotpath private flags as bits and as bitfield > + * booleans combined, only to assert cacheline placement > + * @priv_flags: flags invisible to userspace defined as bits, see > + * enum netdev_priv_flags for the definitions The kdoc scripts says: include/linux/netdevice.h:2392: warning: Excess struct member 'priv_flags_fast' description in 'net_device' I thought you sent a kernel-doc patch during previous cycle to fix this, or was that for something else?