From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [62.89.141.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C781BEDC; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 01:48:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.89.141.173 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723600128; cv=none; b=X/F2uzULotwd6LxyKt2VjQvDRpvVHQ22C7nYnkopULOn2/oQu5SDktkdZMMitBEf18KaEi+WRUiFIprQS8djJWKOSpeIxaWtXP8xNRd+PvFkYxvpkbvc6U7TWNH1AAmqQAaqAQFHgi2r77queAVmQbxKr6F2viKd+VuJ7eEOvj8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723600128; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Il4bHX9AaecI1cwr3XF2SfvG7qxH5l4hNka0ybn1aak=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=nUmHhsooikoHAvHjQcZ6z1+A4M5MvgULSHxwGhSAYHwxGSBn+fdAe7zckOR4k++t1N4Q4QuN4Z0mv39Tl+Ao2a9ycvb+JYXdJrsA4GvNSIhZEhu2KEy5BkIRFRqn+kmxAWDDXY0a9eVfoCCqflTiCEaQdoETGRKeBrTEm7Xw+2A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ftp.linux.org.uk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linux.org.uk header.i=@linux.org.uk header.b=AueS/u5Y; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.89.141.173 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ftp.linux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linux.org.uk header.i=@linux.org.uk header.b="AueS/u5Y" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.org.uk; s=zeniv-20220401; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=MjkeWq7O9U+r76a6NCiL25eqQy0v+wAzBQJ5818MIoY=; b=AueS/u5YDYx2B0z2U70u87dujQ vYWWcn8GiRxUDk0E6r2g7+W7ruhnSsVYR4ZUqO70UgZI+Hnl1qyvAWQRbGE5NgNb9tgGoUL5OW2sg YQItPhzFNWBtKauAGw2ZqoLzX8p7yG0UZqiI50OSvG7TQkdhV5eJDZeR9/sLsUQti9z8rZGNZMGD2 U+D4K9iQ6oeoYWSj7WueAC7XYdUfHAHxx0OKGiZNN/nCNj8n//qrhIMYGCZAqB1rRLcJyULpB4+bZ xj26yKEwOOKl0HfYIbjn2/+/riazzlvmYlyh7ioSdK5pn6J9TaZTE8pFTG0woDO5QFJ6rNgT1tb9j KpSKRlCw==; Received: from viro by zeniv.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1se37w-00000001UK2-380O; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 01:48:40 +0000 Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 02:48:40 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , Christian Brauner , Aleksa Sarai , bpf , Networking , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the vfs-brauner tree Message-ID: <20240814014840.GN13701@ZenIV> References: <20240814105629.0ad9631b@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240814105629.0ad9631b@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: Al Viro On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 10:56:29AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in: > > fs/coda/inode.c > > between commit: > > 626c2be9822d ("coda: use param->file for FSCONFIG_SET_FD") FWIW, I'm not sure that FSCONFIG_SET_FD is a good idea, seeing that it went without a single user for 6 years and this case does not look convincing. Oh, well - too late for that, by 8 years or so...