netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	dsahern@kernel.org, dongml2@chinatelecom.cn, idosch@nvidia.com,
	amcohen@nvidia.com, gnault@redhat.com, bpoirier@nvidia.com,
	b.galvani@gmail.com, razor@blackwall.org, petrm@nvidia.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 06/10] net: vxlan: add skb drop reasons to vxlan_rcv()
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 19:22:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240816192243.050d0b1f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240815124302.982711-7-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>

On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 20:42:58 +0800 Menglong Dong wrote:
>  #define VXLAN_DROP_REASONS(R)			\
> +	R(VXLAN_DROP_FLAGS)			\
> +	R(VXLAN_DROP_VNI)			\
> +	R(VXLAN_DROP_MAC)			\

Drop reasons should be documented.
I don't think name of a header field is a great fit for a reason.

>  	/* deliberate comment for trailing \ */
>  
>  enum vxlan_drop_reason {
> diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
> index e971c4785962..9a61f04bb95d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
> @@ -1668,6 +1668,7 @@ static bool vxlan_ecn_decapsulate(struct vxlan_sock *vs, void *oiph,
>  /* Callback from net/ipv4/udp.c to receive packets */
>  static int vxlan_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  {
> +	enum skb_drop_reason reason = pskb_may_pull_reason(skb, VXLAN_HLEN);

Do not call complex functions inline as variable init..

>  	struct vxlan_vni_node *vninode = NULL;
>  	struct vxlan_dev *vxlan;
>  	struct vxlan_sock *vs;
> @@ -1681,7 +1682,7 @@ static int vxlan_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  	int nh;
>  
>  	/* Need UDP and VXLAN header to be present */
> -	if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, VXLAN_HLEN))
> +	if (reason != SKB_NOT_DROPPED_YET)

please don't compare against "not dropped yet", just:

	if (reason)

> @@ -1815,8 +1831,9 @@ static int vxlan_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  	return 0;
>  
>  drop:
> +	SKB_DR_RESET(reason);

the name of this macro is very confusing, I don't think it should exist
in the first place. nothing should goto drop without initialing reason

>  	/* Consume bad packet */
> -	kfree_skb(skb);
> +	kfree_skb_reason(skb, reason);
>  	return 0;
>  }

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-17  2:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-15 12:42 [PATCH net-next 00/10] net: vxlan: add skb drop reasons support Menglong Dong
2024-08-15 12:42 ` [PATCH net-next 01/10] net: vxlan: add vxlan to the drop reason subsystem Menglong Dong
2024-08-15 12:42 ` [PATCH net-next 02/10] net: skb: add SKB_DR_RESET Menglong Dong
2024-08-20 12:24   ` Ido Schimmel
2024-08-21 12:55     ` Menglong Dong
2024-08-15 12:42 ` [PATCH net-next 03/10] net: skb: introduce pskb_network_may_pull_reason() Menglong Dong
2024-08-15 12:42 ` [PATCH net-next 04/10] net: ip: introduce pskb_inet_may_pull_reason() Menglong Dong
2024-08-15 12:42 ` [PATCH net-next 05/10] net: vxlan: make vxlan_remcsum() return skb drop reasons Menglong Dong
2024-08-15 12:42 ` [PATCH net-next 06/10] net: vxlan: add skb drop reasons to vxlan_rcv() Menglong Dong
2024-08-17  2:22   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-08-17 11:33     ` Menglong Dong
2024-08-19 22:59       ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-21 12:51         ` Menglong Dong
2024-08-20 12:26   ` Ido Schimmel
2024-08-21 12:54     ` Menglong Dong
2024-08-15 12:42 ` [PATCH net-next 07/10] net: vxlan: use vxlan_kfree_skb() in vxlan_xmit() Menglong Dong
2024-08-20 12:28   ` Ido Schimmel
2024-08-21 12:57     ` Menglong Dong
2024-08-15 12:43 ` [PATCH net-next 08/10] net: vxlan: add drop reasons support to vxlan_xmit_one() Menglong Dong
2024-08-20 12:33   ` Ido Schimmel
2024-08-21 13:02     ` Menglong Dong
2024-08-15 12:43 ` [PATCH net-next 09/10] net: vxlan: use kfree_skb_reason in vxlan_encap_bypass Menglong Dong
2024-08-15 12:43 ` [PATCH net-next 10/10] net: vxlan: use vxlan_kfree_skb in encap_bypass_if_local Menglong Dong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240816192243.050d0b1f@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=amcohen@nvidia.com \
    --cc=b.galvani@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpoirier@nvidia.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dongml2@chinatelecom.cn \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gnault@redhat.com \
    --cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=razor@blackwall.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).