* [PATCH net V4 1/3] bonding: implement xdo_dev_state_free and call it after deletion
2024-08-15 14:21 [PATCH net V4 0/3] Fixes for IPsec over bonding Tariq Toukan
@ 2024-08-15 14:21 ` Tariq Toukan
2024-08-16 3:07 ` Hangbin Liu
2024-08-15 14:21 ` [PATCH net V4 2/3] bonding: extract the use of real_device into local variable Tariq Toukan
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tariq Toukan @ 2024-08-15 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Eric Dumazet,
Jay Vosburgh, Andy Gospodarek
Cc: netdev, Saeed Mahameed, Gal Pressman, Leon Romanovsky,
Hangbin Liu, Jianbo Liu, Tariq Toukan
From: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
Add this implementation for bonding, so hardware resources can be
freed from the active slave after xfrm state is deleted. The netdev
used to invoke xdo_dev_state_free callback, is saved in the xfrm state
(xs->xso.real_dev), which is also the bond's active slave.
And call it when deleting all SAs from old active real interface while
switching current active slave.
Fixes: 9a5605505d9c ("bonding: Add struct bond_ipesc to manage SA")
Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 1cd92c12e782..eb5e43860670 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -581,6 +581,8 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
__func__);
} else {
slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete(ipsec->xs);
+ if (slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free)
+ slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(ipsec->xs);
}
ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = NULL;
}
@@ -588,6 +590,35 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
rcu_read_unlock();
}
+static void bond_ipsec_free_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
+{
+ struct net_device *bond_dev = xs->xso.dev;
+ struct net_device *real_dev;
+ struct bonding *bond;
+ struct slave *slave;
+
+ if (!bond_dev)
+ return;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
+ slave = rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
+ real_dev = slave ? slave->dev : NULL;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ if (!slave)
+ return;
+
+ if (!xs->xso.real_dev)
+ return;
+
+ WARN_ON(xs->xso.real_dev != real_dev);
+
+ if (real_dev && real_dev->xfrmdev_ops &&
+ real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free)
+ real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(xs);
+}
+
/**
* bond_ipsec_offload_ok - can this packet use the xfrm hw offload
* @skb: current data packet
@@ -632,6 +663,7 @@ static bool bond_ipsec_offload_ok(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xfrm_state *xs)
static const struct xfrmdev_ops bond_xfrmdev_ops = {
.xdo_dev_state_add = bond_ipsec_add_sa,
.xdo_dev_state_delete = bond_ipsec_del_sa,
+ .xdo_dev_state_free = bond_ipsec_free_sa,
.xdo_dev_offload_ok = bond_ipsec_offload_ok,
};
#endif /* CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD */
--
2.44.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net V4 1/3] bonding: implement xdo_dev_state_free and call it after deletion
2024-08-15 14:21 ` [PATCH net V4 1/3] bonding: implement xdo_dev_state_free and call it after deletion Tariq Toukan
@ 2024-08-16 3:07 ` Hangbin Liu
2024-08-16 9:10 ` Jianbo Liu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Hangbin Liu @ 2024-08-16 3:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tariq Toukan
Cc: David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Eric Dumazet,
Jay Vosburgh, Andy Gospodarek, netdev, Saeed Mahameed,
Gal Pressman, Leon Romanovsky, Jianbo Liu
On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 05:21:01PM +0300, Tariq Toukan wrote:
> From: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
>
> Add this implementation for bonding, so hardware resources can be
> freed from the active slave after xfrm state is deleted. The netdev
> used to invoke xdo_dev_state_free callback, is saved in the xfrm state
> (xs->xso.real_dev), which is also the bond's active slave.
>
> And call it when deleting all SAs from old active real interface while
> switching current active slave.
>
> Fixes: 9a5605505d9c ("bonding: Add struct bond_ipesc to manage SA")
> Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index 1cd92c12e782..eb5e43860670 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -581,6 +581,8 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
> __func__);
> } else {
> slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete(ipsec->xs);
> + if (slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free)
> + slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(ipsec->xs);
> }
> ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = NULL;
> }
> @@ -588,6 +590,35 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
> rcu_read_unlock();
> }
>
> +static void bond_ipsec_free_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
> +{
> + struct net_device *bond_dev = xs->xso.dev;
> + struct net_device *real_dev;
> + struct bonding *bond;
> + struct slave *slave;
> +
> + if (!bond_dev)
> + return;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
> + slave = rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
> + real_dev = slave ? slave->dev : NULL;
> + rcu_read_unlock();
As I replied in https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ZrwgRaDc1Vo0Jhcj@Laptop-X1/,
> +
> + if (!slave)
> + return;
> +
> + if (!xs->xso.real_dev)
> + return;
> +
> + WARN_ON(xs->xso.real_dev != real_dev);
> +
> + if (real_dev && real_dev->xfrmdev_ops &&
> + real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free)
> + real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(xs);
How do you make sure the slave not freed after rcu_read_unlock()?
Thanks
Hangbin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net V4 1/3] bonding: implement xdo_dev_state_free and call it after deletion
2024-08-16 3:07 ` Hangbin Liu
@ 2024-08-16 9:10 ` Jianbo Liu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jianbo Liu @ 2024-08-16 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tariq Toukan, liuhangbin@gmail.com
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, Leon Romanovsky, andy@greyhouse.net,
Gal Pressman, jv@jvosburgh.net, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, Saeed Mahameed,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
On Fri, 2024-08-16 at 11:07 +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 05:21:01PM +0300, Tariq Toukan wrote:
> > From: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
> >
> > Add this implementation for bonding, so hardware resources can be
> > freed from the active slave after xfrm state is deleted. The netdev
> > used to invoke xdo_dev_state_free callback, is saved in the xfrm
> > state
> > (xs->xso.real_dev), which is also the bond's active slave.
> >
> > And call it when deleting all SAs from old active real interface
> > while
> > switching current active slave.
> >
> > Fixes: 9a5605505d9c ("bonding: Add struct bond_ipesc to manage SA")
> > Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 32
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> > b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> > index 1cd92c12e782..eb5e43860670 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> > @@ -581,6 +581,8 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct
> > bonding *bond)
> > __func__);
> > } else {
> > slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops-
> > >xdo_dev_state_delete(ipsec->xs);
> > + if (slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops-
> > >xdo_dev_state_free)
> > + slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops-
> > >xdo_dev_state_free(ipsec->xs);
> > }
> > ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = NULL;
> > }
> > @@ -588,6 +590,35 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct
> > bonding *bond)
> > rcu_read_unlock();
> > }
> >
> > +static void bond_ipsec_free_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
> > +{
> > + struct net_device *bond_dev = xs->xso.dev;
> > + struct net_device *real_dev;
> > + struct bonding *bond;
> > + struct slave *slave;
> > +
> > + if (!bond_dev)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > + bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
> > + slave = rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
> > + real_dev = slave ? slave->dev : NULL;
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
>
> As I replied in
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ZrwgRaDc1Vo0Jhcj@Laptop-X1/,
>
As I replied, the RCU lock is to protect the reading of the content
pointed by curr_active_slave, not the slave->dev itself.
> > +
> > + if (!slave)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + if (!xs->xso.real_dev)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + WARN_ON(xs->xso.real_dev != real_dev);
> > +
> > + if (real_dev && real_dev->xfrmdev_ops &&
> > + real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free)
> > + real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(xs);
>
> How do you make sure the slave not freed after rcu_read_unlock()?
>
So do you want to move rcu_read_unlock after xdo_dev_state_free, just
like what you did in your patches?
Thanks!
Jianbo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net V4 2/3] bonding: extract the use of real_device into local variable
2024-08-15 14:21 [PATCH net V4 0/3] Fixes for IPsec over bonding Tariq Toukan
2024-08-15 14:21 ` [PATCH net V4 1/3] bonding: implement xdo_dev_state_free and call it after deletion Tariq Toukan
@ 2024-08-15 14:21 ` Tariq Toukan
2024-08-15 14:21 ` [PATCH net V4 3/3] bonding: change ipsec_lock from spin lock to mutex Tariq Toukan
2024-08-17 2:24 ` [PATCH net V4 0/3] Fixes for IPsec over bonding Jakub Kicinski
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tariq Toukan @ 2024-08-15 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Eric Dumazet,
Jay Vosburgh, Andy Gospodarek
Cc: netdev, Saeed Mahameed, Gal Pressman, Leon Romanovsky,
Hangbin Liu, Jianbo Liu, Cosmin Ratiu, Tariq Toukan
From: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
Add a local variable for slave->dev, to prepare for the lock change in
the next patch. There is no functionality change.
Fixes: 9a5605505d9c ("bonding: Add struct bond_ipesc to manage SA")
Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index eb5e43860670..e550b1c08fdb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -427,6 +427,7 @@ static int bond_ipsec_add_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
struct net_device *bond_dev = xs->xso.dev;
+ struct net_device *real_dev;
struct bond_ipsec *ipsec;
struct bonding *bond;
struct slave *slave;
@@ -443,9 +444,10 @@ static int bond_ipsec_add_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs,
return -ENODEV;
}
- if (!slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops ||
- !slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add ||
- netif_is_bond_master(slave->dev)) {
+ real_dev = slave->dev;
+ if (!real_dev->xfrmdev_ops ||
+ !real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add ||
+ netif_is_bond_master(real_dev)) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Slave does not support ipsec offload");
rcu_read_unlock();
return -EINVAL;
@@ -456,9 +458,9 @@ static int bond_ipsec_add_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs,
rcu_read_unlock();
return -ENOMEM;
}
- xs->xso.real_dev = slave->dev;
- err = slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add(xs, extack);
+ xs->xso.real_dev = real_dev;
+ err = real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add(xs, extack);
if (!err) {
ipsec->xs = xs;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ipsec->list);
@@ -475,6 +477,7 @@ static int bond_ipsec_add_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs,
static void bond_ipsec_add_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
{
struct net_device *bond_dev = bond->dev;
+ struct net_device *real_dev;
struct bond_ipsec *ipsec;
struct slave *slave;
@@ -483,12 +486,13 @@ static void bond_ipsec_add_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
if (!slave)
goto out;
- if (!slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops ||
- !slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add ||
- netif_is_bond_master(slave->dev)) {
+ real_dev = slave->dev;
+ if (!real_dev->xfrmdev_ops ||
+ !real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add ||
+ netif_is_bond_master(real_dev)) {
spin_lock_bh(&bond->ipsec_lock);
if (!list_empty(&bond->ipsec_list))
- slave_warn(bond_dev, slave->dev,
+ slave_warn(bond_dev, real_dev,
"%s: no slave xdo_dev_state_add\n",
__func__);
spin_unlock_bh(&bond->ipsec_lock);
@@ -497,9 +501,9 @@ static void bond_ipsec_add_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
spin_lock_bh(&bond->ipsec_lock);
list_for_each_entry(ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
- ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = slave->dev;
- if (slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add(ipsec->xs, NULL)) {
- slave_warn(bond_dev, slave->dev, "%s: failed to add SA\n", __func__);
+ ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = real_dev;
+ if (real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add(ipsec->xs, NULL)) {
+ slave_warn(bond_dev, real_dev, "%s: failed to add SA\n", __func__);
ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = NULL;
}
}
@@ -515,6 +519,7 @@ static void bond_ipsec_add_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
static void bond_ipsec_del_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
{
struct net_device *bond_dev = xs->xso.dev;
+ struct net_device *real_dev;
struct bond_ipsec *ipsec;
struct bonding *bond;
struct slave *slave;
@@ -532,16 +537,17 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
if (!xs->xso.real_dev)
goto out;
- WARN_ON(xs->xso.real_dev != slave->dev);
+ real_dev = slave->dev;
+ WARN_ON(xs->xso.real_dev != real_dev);
- if (!slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops ||
- !slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete ||
- netif_is_bond_master(slave->dev)) {
- slave_warn(bond_dev, slave->dev, "%s: no slave xdo_dev_state_delete\n", __func__);
+ if (!real_dev->xfrmdev_ops ||
+ !real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete ||
+ netif_is_bond_master(real_dev)) {
+ slave_warn(bond_dev, real_dev, "%s: no slave xdo_dev_state_delete\n", __func__);
goto out;
}
- slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete(xs);
+ real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete(xs);
out:
spin_lock_bh(&bond->ipsec_lock);
list_for_each_entry(ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
@@ -558,6 +564,7 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
{
struct net_device *bond_dev = bond->dev;
+ struct net_device *real_dev;
struct bond_ipsec *ipsec;
struct slave *slave;
@@ -568,21 +575,22 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
return;
}
+ real_dev = slave->dev;
spin_lock_bh(&bond->ipsec_lock);
list_for_each_entry(ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
if (!ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev)
continue;
- if (!slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops ||
- !slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete ||
- netif_is_bond_master(slave->dev)) {
- slave_warn(bond_dev, slave->dev,
+ if (!real_dev->xfrmdev_ops ||
+ !real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete ||
+ netif_is_bond_master(real_dev)) {
+ slave_warn(bond_dev, real_dev,
"%s: no slave xdo_dev_state_delete\n",
__func__);
} else {
- slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete(ipsec->xs);
- if (slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free)
- slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(ipsec->xs);
+ real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete(ipsec->xs);
+ if (real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free)
+ real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(ipsec->xs);
}
ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = NULL;
}
--
2.44.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [PATCH net V4 3/3] bonding: change ipsec_lock from spin lock to mutex
2024-08-15 14:21 [PATCH net V4 0/3] Fixes for IPsec over bonding Tariq Toukan
2024-08-15 14:21 ` [PATCH net V4 1/3] bonding: implement xdo_dev_state_free and call it after deletion Tariq Toukan
2024-08-15 14:21 ` [PATCH net V4 2/3] bonding: extract the use of real_device into local variable Tariq Toukan
@ 2024-08-15 14:21 ` Tariq Toukan
2024-08-17 2:24 ` [PATCH net V4 0/3] Fixes for IPsec over bonding Jakub Kicinski
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tariq Toukan @ 2024-08-15 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Eric Dumazet,
Jay Vosburgh, Andy Gospodarek
Cc: netdev, Saeed Mahameed, Gal Pressman, Leon Romanovsky,
Hangbin Liu, Jianbo Liu, Tariq Toukan
From: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
In the cited commit, bond->ipsec_lock is added to protect ipsec_list,
hence xdo_dev_state_add and xdo_dev_state_delete are called inside
this lock. As ipsec_lock is a spin lock and such xfrmdev ops may sleep,
"scheduling while atomic" will be triggered when changing bond's
active slave.
[ 101.055189] BUG: scheduling while atomic: bash/902/0x00000200
[ 101.055726] Modules linked in:
[ 101.058211] CPU: 3 PID: 902 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4+ #1
[ 101.058760] Hardware name:
[ 101.059434] Call Trace:
[ 101.059436] <TASK>
[ 101.060873] dump_stack_lvl+0x51/0x60
[ 101.061275] __schedule_bug+0x4e/0x60
[ 101.061682] __schedule+0x612/0x7c0
[ 101.062078] ? __mod_timer+0x25c/0x370
[ 101.062486] schedule+0x25/0xd0
[ 101.062845] schedule_timeout+0x77/0xf0
[ 101.063265] ? asm_common_interrupt+0x22/0x40
[ 101.063724] ? __bpf_trace_itimer_state+0x10/0x10
[ 101.064215] __wait_for_common+0x87/0x190
[ 101.064648] ? usleep_range_state+0x90/0x90
[ 101.065091] cmd_exec+0x437/0xb20 [mlx5_core]
[ 101.065569] mlx5_cmd_do+0x1e/0x40 [mlx5_core]
[ 101.066051] mlx5_cmd_exec+0x18/0x30 [mlx5_core]
[ 101.066552] mlx5_crypto_create_dek_key+0xea/0x120 [mlx5_core]
[ 101.067163] ? bonding_sysfs_store_option+0x4d/0x80 [bonding]
[ 101.067738] ? kmalloc_trace+0x4d/0x350
[ 101.068156] mlx5_ipsec_create_sa_ctx+0x33/0x100 [mlx5_core]
[ 101.068747] mlx5e_xfrm_add_state+0x47b/0xaa0 [mlx5_core]
[ 101.069312] bond_change_active_slave+0x392/0x900 [bonding]
[ 101.069868] bond_option_active_slave_set+0x1c2/0x240 [bonding]
[ 101.070454] __bond_opt_set+0xa6/0x430 [bonding]
[ 101.070935] __bond_opt_set_notify+0x2f/0x90 [bonding]
[ 101.071453] bond_opt_tryset_rtnl+0x72/0xb0 [bonding]
[ 101.071965] bonding_sysfs_store_option+0x4d/0x80 [bonding]
[ 101.072567] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x10c/0x1a0
[ 101.073033] vfs_write+0x2d8/0x400
[ 101.073416] ? alloc_fd+0x48/0x180
[ 101.073798] ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0
[ 101.074175] do_syscall_64+0x52/0x110
[ 101.074576] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
As bond_ipsec_add_sa_all and bond_ipsec_del_sa_all are only called
from bond_change_active_slave, which requires holding the RTNL lock.
And bond_ipsec_add_sa and bond_ipsec_del_sa are xfrm state
xdo_dev_state_add and xdo_dev_state_delete APIs, which are in user
context. So ipsec_lock doesn't have to be spin lock, change it to
mutex, and thus the above issue can be resolved.
Fixes: 9a5605505d9c ("bonding: Add struct bond_ipesc to manage SA")
Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++----------------
include/net/bonding.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index e550b1c08fdb..56764f1c39b8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -439,38 +439,33 @@ static int bond_ipsec_add_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs,
rcu_read_lock();
bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
slave = rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
- if (!slave) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ real_dev = slave ? slave->dev : NULL;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ if (!real_dev)
return -ENODEV;
- }
- real_dev = slave->dev;
if (!real_dev->xfrmdev_ops ||
!real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add ||
netif_is_bond_master(real_dev)) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Slave does not support ipsec offload");
- rcu_read_unlock();
return -EINVAL;
}
- ipsec = kmalloc(sizeof(*ipsec), GFP_ATOMIC);
- if (!ipsec) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ ipsec = kmalloc(sizeof(*ipsec), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!ipsec)
return -ENOMEM;
- }
xs->xso.real_dev = real_dev;
err = real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add(xs, extack);
if (!err) {
ipsec->xs = xs;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ipsec->list);
- spin_lock_bh(&bond->ipsec_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
list_add(&ipsec->list, &bond->ipsec_list);
- spin_unlock_bh(&bond->ipsec_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
} else {
kfree(ipsec);
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
return err;
}
@@ -481,35 +476,43 @@ static void bond_ipsec_add_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
struct bond_ipsec *ipsec;
struct slave *slave;
- rcu_read_lock();
- slave = rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
- if (!slave)
- goto out;
+ slave = rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
+ real_dev = slave ? slave->dev : NULL;
+ if (!real_dev)
+ return;
- real_dev = slave->dev;
+ mutex_lock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
if (!real_dev->xfrmdev_ops ||
!real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add ||
netif_is_bond_master(real_dev)) {
- spin_lock_bh(&bond->ipsec_lock);
if (!list_empty(&bond->ipsec_list))
slave_warn(bond_dev, real_dev,
"%s: no slave xdo_dev_state_add\n",
__func__);
- spin_unlock_bh(&bond->ipsec_lock);
goto out;
}
- spin_lock_bh(&bond->ipsec_lock);
list_for_each_entry(ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
+ struct net_device *dev = ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev;
+
+ /* If new state is added before ipsec_lock acquired */
+ if (dev) {
+ if (dev == real_dev)
+ continue;
+
+ dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete(ipsec->xs);
+ if (dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free)
+ dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(ipsec->xs);
+ }
+
ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = real_dev;
if (real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add(ipsec->xs, NULL)) {
slave_warn(bond_dev, real_dev, "%s: failed to add SA\n", __func__);
ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = NULL;
}
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&bond->ipsec_lock);
out:
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ mutex_unlock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
}
/**
@@ -530,6 +533,8 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
rcu_read_lock();
bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
slave = rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
+ real_dev = slave ? slave->dev : NULL;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
if (!slave)
goto out;
@@ -537,7 +542,6 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
if (!xs->xso.real_dev)
goto out;
- real_dev = slave->dev;
WARN_ON(xs->xso.real_dev != real_dev);
if (!real_dev->xfrmdev_ops ||
@@ -549,7 +553,7 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete(xs);
out:
- spin_lock_bh(&bond->ipsec_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
list_for_each_entry(ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
if (ipsec->xs == xs) {
list_del(&ipsec->list);
@@ -557,8 +561,7 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
break;
}
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&bond->ipsec_lock);
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ mutex_unlock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
}
static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
@@ -568,15 +571,12 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
struct bond_ipsec *ipsec;
struct slave *slave;
- rcu_read_lock();
- slave = rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
- if (!slave) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ slave = rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
+ real_dev = slave ? slave->dev : NULL;
+ if (!real_dev)
return;
- }
- real_dev = slave->dev;
- spin_lock_bh(&bond->ipsec_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
list_for_each_entry(ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
if (!ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev)
continue;
@@ -594,8 +594,7 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
}
ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = NULL;
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&bond->ipsec_lock);
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ mutex_unlock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
}
static void bond_ipsec_free_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
@@ -5922,7 +5921,7 @@ void bond_setup(struct net_device *bond_dev)
/* set up xfrm device ops (only supported in active-backup right now) */
bond_dev->xfrmdev_ops = &bond_xfrmdev_ops;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bond->ipsec_list);
- spin_lock_init(&bond->ipsec_lock);
+ mutex_init(&bond->ipsec_lock);
#endif /* CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD */
/* don't acquire bond device's netif_tx_lock when transmitting */
@@ -5971,6 +5970,10 @@ static void bond_uninit(struct net_device *bond_dev)
__bond_release_one(bond_dev, slave->dev, true, true);
netdev_info(bond_dev, "Released all slaves\n");
+#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD
+ mutex_destroy(&bond->ipsec_lock);
+#endif /* CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD */
+
bond_set_slave_arr(bond, NULL, NULL);
list_del_rcu(&bond->bond_list);
diff --git a/include/net/bonding.h b/include/net/bonding.h
index b61fb1aa3a56..8bb5f016969f 100644
--- a/include/net/bonding.h
+++ b/include/net/bonding.h
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ struct bonding {
#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD
struct list_head ipsec_list;
/* protecting ipsec_list */
- spinlock_t ipsec_lock;
+ struct mutex ipsec_lock;
#endif /* CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD */
struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog;
};
--
2.44.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net V4 0/3] Fixes for IPsec over bonding
2024-08-15 14:21 [PATCH net V4 0/3] Fixes for IPsec over bonding Tariq Toukan
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-08-15 14:21 ` [PATCH net V4 3/3] bonding: change ipsec_lock from spin lock to mutex Tariq Toukan
@ 2024-08-17 2:24 ` Jakub Kicinski
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2024-08-17 2:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tariq Toukan
Cc: David S. Miller, Paolo Abeni, Eric Dumazet, Jay Vosburgh,
Andy Gospodarek, netdev, Saeed Mahameed, Gal Pressman,
Leon Romanovsky, Hangbin Liu, Jianbo Liu
On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 17:21:00 +0300 Tariq Toukan wrote:
> This patchset by Jianbo provides bug fixes for IPsec over bonding
> driver.
>
> It adds the missing xdo_dev_state_free API, and fixes "scheduling while
> atomic" by using mutex lock instead.
Let's take Nik's patches first.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread