netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Aijay Adams <aijay@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] netconsole: Populate dynamic entry even if netpoll fails
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 15:49:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240821154926.14785d66@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZsWjpuoszvApM1I0@gmail.com>

On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 01:21:58 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote:
> Another way to write this is:
> 
>         err = netpoll_setup(&nt->np);
>         if (err) {
>                 pr_err("Not enabling netconsole. Netpoll setup failed\n");
>                 if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NETCONSOLE_DYNAMIC))
>                         goto fail
>         } else {
>                 nt->enabled = true;
>         }
> 
> is it better? Or, Is there a even better way to write this?

Yes, I think this is better! Or at least I wouldn't have made the same
mistake reading it if it was written this way :)

> > As for the message would it be more helpful to indicate target will be
> > disabled? Move the print after the check for dynamic and say "Netpoll
> > setup failed, netconsole target will be disabled" ?  
> 
> In both cases the target will be disabled, right? In one case, it will
> populate the cmdline0 configfs (if CONFIG_NETCONSOLE_DYNAMIC is set),
> otherwise it will fail completely. Either way, netconsole will be
> disabled.

No strong feelings. I was trying to highlight that it's a single target
that ends up being disabled "netconsole disabled" sounds like the whole
netconsole module is completely out of commission.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-21 22:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-19 10:36 [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] netconsole: Populate dynamic entry even if netpoll fails Breno Leitao
2024-08-19 10:36 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] netpoll: Ensure clean state on setup failures Breno Leitao
2024-08-20 23:20   ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-21  8:44     ` Breno Leitao
2024-08-19 10:36 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] netconsole: pr_err() when netpoll_setup fails Breno Leitao
2024-08-20 23:24   ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-21  8:41     ` Breno Leitao
2024-08-21 22:54       ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-22 10:01         ` Breno Leitao
2024-08-19 10:36 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] netconsole: Populate dynamic entry even if netpoll fails Breno Leitao
2024-08-20 23:27   ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-21  8:21     ` Breno Leitao
2024-08-21 22:49       ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-08-22 11:00         ` Breno Leitao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240821154926.14785d66@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=aijay@meta.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).