From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2989B4F8A0; Sat, 24 Aug 2024 17:43:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724521427; cv=none; b=h2RxwIU+NYerraQzBx3OeA17rCmWhRwh+tPL3Mc3ioMeszGSDxjfjItdDOrA9PajgbOt+DmB90I5hPxhvGQMVWlTR4eCuUbM/nJ7X/nVaPDvFVGmAzFlsn4tq+CYmFskEF7l+QLDKhmO76u/rrsU+LQTlzRyOYMsTFsfF4N31E8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724521427; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3jN+tm6TRIeXJQ6l99NSaIsAt6ky6FvajSCWbwlyKyw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZQ32CqOeyETYrxdmPJUZ/7+fp1zfaTBXpY+nHhWQZR5Bxrhre7/mfI95SIUsMug8VKIrXW1zUpNnY4r5xgo6HzWJI6/EI8vTtnm5bT9OLYizjv76joJ4H3Kh0BXRK+/F/Lsfi7vZNPfXmIEYNKfcy2dMjezcKE4SPT2vr4UtBOo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=BTzxkUqM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="BTzxkUqM" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A35BC32781; Sat, 24 Aug 2024 17:43:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1724521426; bh=3jN+tm6TRIeXJQ6l99NSaIsAt6ky6FvajSCWbwlyKyw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=BTzxkUqM34F1jFTGs+EPepSd2f5bf5OvXP/TxXSH8r7jJJ7fEfgNaIR0iy/7U0Oea +HzbEfgHwgc7hdec+mlNDV1mDS6BptKK5/zHIZo1S1vcle8yKSYQgcbFHape9XNMY7 Zt//cpyZECrZhOSpCBkhXfaydfdPkff1qsx8vBXRmyu2XcQDEHt+kXk4M+Sbt5z9xI Ro9DaHZTIh6pGy2NSrVGUXXcrzkcW3uuDoWt+QmVbZpDfgNLJFoiXfFxzCVy/0V4zp QuoT4D53qNfsIg3c1FeVurLpkijuSJu44sDR9OTM6ynVTwstnOaqoA9Eb2/UQVZa/+ NVpSL+StvVGrw== Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 10:43:45 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Alexander Lobakin Cc: Eric Dumazet , "David S. Miller" , Paolo Abeni , David Ahern , Xuan Zhuo , Andrew Lunn , Willem de Bruijn , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/6] netdev_features: remove unused __UNUSED_NETIF_F_1 Message-ID: <20240824104345.196d6564@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <6c72dbc6-98a1-4682-97ca-e2f76c81a178@intel.com> References: <20240821150700.1760518-1-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> <20240821150700.1760518-3-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> <20240822163129.0982128f@kernel.org> <6c72dbc6-98a1-4682-97ca-e2f76c81a178@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 14:34:13 +0200 Alexander Lobakin wrote: > > On one hand it may be good to make any potential breakage obvious, > > on the other we could avoid regressions if we stick to reserving > > the bits, and reusing them, but the bits we don't delete could remain > > at their current position? > > Hmm, sounds fine. IOW just rename all the bits I remove to > __UNUSED_NETIF_F_xx? Yup!