netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org, willemb@google.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/2] tcp: make SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE feature per socket
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 23:24:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240825152440.93054-2-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240825152440.93054-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>

From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>

Normally, if we want to record and print the rx timestamp after
tcp_recvmsg_locked(), we must enable both SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE
and SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE flags, from which we also can notice
through running rxtimestamp binary in selftests (see testcase 7).

However, there is one particular case that fails the selftests with
"./rxtimestamp: Expected swtstamp to not be set." error printing in
testcase 6.

How does it happen? When we keep running a thread starting a socket
and set SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE option first, then running
./rxtimestamp, it will fail. The reason is the former thread
switching on netstamp_needed_key that makes the feature global,
every skb going through netif_receive_skb_list_internal() function
will get a current timestamp in net_timestamp_check(). So the skb
will have timestamp regardless of whether its socket option has
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE or not.

After this patch, we can pass the selftest and control each socket
as we want when using rx timestamp feature.

Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp.c | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index 8514257f4ecd..49e73d66c57d 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -2235,6 +2235,7 @@ void tcp_recv_timestamp(struct msghdr *msg, const struct sock *sk,
 			struct scm_timestamping_internal *tss)
 {
 	int new_tstamp = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TSTAMP_NEW);
+	u32 tsflags = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags);
 	bool has_timestamping = false;
 
 	if (tss->ts[0].tv_sec || tss->ts[0].tv_nsec) {
@@ -2274,14 +2275,19 @@ void tcp_recv_timestamp(struct msghdr *msg, const struct sock *sk,
 			}
 		}
 
-		if (READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags) & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE)
+		/* skb may contain timestamp because another socket
+		 * turned on netstamp_needed_key which allows generate
+		 * the timestamp. So we need to check the current socket.
+		 */
+		if (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE &&
+		    tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE)
 			has_timestamping = true;
 		else
 			tss->ts[0] = (struct timespec64) {0};
 	}
 
 	if (tss->ts[2].tv_sec || tss->ts[2].tv_nsec) {
-		if (READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags) & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE)
+		if (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE)
 			has_timestamping = true;
 		else
 			tss->ts[2] = (struct timespec64) {0};
-- 
2.37.3


  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-25 15:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-25 15:24 [PATCH net-next 0/2] timestamp: control SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE feature per socket Jason Xing
2024-08-25 15:24 ` Jason Xing [this message]
2024-08-26 13:24   ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] tcp: make " Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-26 13:40     ` Jason Xing
2024-08-26 16:03       ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-26 16:41         ` Jason Xing
2024-08-26 18:43           ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-26 23:42             ` Jason Xing
2024-08-27 13:20               ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-27 15:27                 ` Jason Xing
2024-08-27 17:08                   ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-28  0:43                     ` Jason Xing
2024-08-28 13:44                       ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-28 14:02                         ` Jason Xing
2024-08-28 14:10                           ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-28 14:18                             ` Jason Xing
2024-08-27 14:46   ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-27 15:31     ` Jason Xing
2024-08-25 15:24 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: " Jason Xing

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240825152440.93054-2-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
    --to=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).