From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFC791C86F0 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 14:46:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724769982; cv=none; b=g3whB6nNWaW7uD5/TE3q93DAr0RrKr36/lk0x5nRVwXXgLXYKENViImn85FPcLHOfafJ+6JlexDB9rV9QOBx9SU6vMI+30ZkBtflma4Nytye6DGybu5MV0UefZptYLBs57KpDxMi8DHtGWgyBL606aehM7E0QN50lggY3UGslU0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724769982; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OJPEq/yU40/DuZNgAVS4bXy/RN30Jzg7BMAg2KwZTwE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=o8LzuFnFwft+eevXq1ortg3TEQJnhUfIVbSB6Cxi5U+j7RgFUtxLPfYw83bevTHYPT21WcAVWihZvLyBbOwFviXgewcBQBoxliIJ3vFt4Oo3jVPqRswMqvidLhUlfB/a6DsX4hOFakEvSlbXzQBPc/+z8WD6HnLvOslziBETxDg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=jLQhnZbx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jLQhnZbx" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3EF5DC6107C; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 14:46:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1724769981; bh=OJPEq/yU40/DuZNgAVS4bXy/RN30Jzg7BMAg2KwZTwE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jLQhnZbx3U+jccPA9omUEmN0WLR2qkVhn2c1UkdsN/yCxbWhShERg59q1Iucqum2E eWfqRkMaqBsGd3P6StnS/nPilDI2lNcVVhB4n6qF4XBj7LDRsOXlFg2DiFBMN5opum JosV+gTeAkWP7OP1Acb6d5qgNm2GUV+zVZNWlzd4f34bz7cflN7l6n4M7SBVE1WRCp tmLxXr1jSKbEFOYqzXZ7A+/BNrvXFnXMKFM+edcuMEvTavVC0HAOMex7k7559pK5R4 nE0LLqFulc/NXE8dkrkJdgKcCxRsN8xXRsyFSPslR0OGx0jK/290lkzPyptaSXKWRI CH0xiPcqNrRWA== Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 07:46:20 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Jason Xing Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org, willemb@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jason Xing Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] tcp: make SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE feature per socket Message-ID: <20240827074620.03f4d92a@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20240825152440.93054-2-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> References: <20240825152440.93054-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> <20240825152440.93054-2-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 23:24:39 +0800 Jason Xing wrote: > However, there is one particular case that fails the selftests with > "./rxtimestamp: Expected swtstamp to not be set." error printing in > testcase 6. In case you ever find yourself looking for ways to improve our tests may I suggest trying to speed up fcnal_test.sh? That'd be a very productive use of time.