netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	ncardwell@google.com, shuah@kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, fw@strlen.de,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
	"Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@kernel.org>,
	martineau@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC] selftests/net: integrate packetdrill with ksft
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 09:01:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240828090120.71be0b20@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <66cf2e4bd8e89_33815c294b2@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>

On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 10:03:55 -0400 Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > > A single script is much
> > > simpler, optionally with nested KTAP (not supported yet by ksft). But,
> > > I'm afraid that running time without intermediate output will be very
> > > long when we integrate all packetdrill scripts.  
> > 
> > If I read correctly, this runs the scripts in the given directory 
> > sequentially (as opposed to the default pktdrill run_all.py behavior 
> > that uses many concurrent threads).
> > 
> > I guess/fear that running all the pktdrill tests in a single batch would 
> > take quite a long time, which in turn could be not so good for CI 
> > integration. Currently there are a couple of CI test-cases with runtime   
> >  > 1h, but that is bad ;)  
> 
> Very good point, thanks! This is the third packetdrill runner that I'm
> writing. I should know this by now.. Let me see whether I can use
> run_all.py rather than reinvent the wheel here.

Do we have to worry about this now? If you're planning to add a runner
specifically for packetdrill... IDK if we should. We already have a few
runners, not to mention that run_kselftest.sh itself can run all the
test cases in parallel in separate network namespaces!

What I was wondering is whether we can use shebang to direct the .pkt
files to be "executed" by the python script. Alternatively we can add
support to specifying "interpreter" for a given test in ksft infra
(kinda like we can pass cmd line arguments to a test). Completely
untested but it should give better idea what I mean than a description:

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/runner.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/runner.sh
index 74954f6a8f94..429c279e9c6e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/runner.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/runner.sh
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ run_one()
 	export kselftest_timeout="$kselftest_default_timeout"
 
 	# Safe default if tr not available
+	kselftest_interp_ref="KSELFTEST_INTERP"
 	kselftest_cmd_args_ref="KSELFTEST_ARGS"
 
 	# Optional arguments for this command, possibly defined as an
@@ -78,6 +79,14 @@ run_one()
 					$TR_CMD [:lower:] [:upper:])
 		kselftest_cmd_args_ref="KSELFTEST_${BASENAME_SANITIZED}_ARGS"
 	fi
+	# Optional interpreter to run the test case
+	if [ -n "$TR_CMD" ]; then
+		SUFFIX_SANITIZED=$(echo "${BASENAME_TEST#*.}" | \
+				       $TR_CMD -d "[:blank:][:cntrl:]" | \
+				       $TR_CMD -c "[:alnum:]_" "_" | \
+				       $TR_CMD [:lower:] [:upper:])
+		kselftest_interp_ref="KSELFTEST_${SUFFIX_SANITIZED}_INTERP"
+	fi
 
 	# Load per-test-directory kselftest "settings" file.
 	settings="$BASE_DIR/$DIR/settings"
@@ -110,8 +119,12 @@ run_one()
 		if [ -x /usr/bin/stdbuf ]; then
 			stdbuf="/usr/bin/stdbuf --output=L "
 		fi
+		eval kselftest_interp="\$${kselftest_interp_ref:-}"
+		# Add a space at the end if interpreter is set to work in $cmd
+		[ -n "$kselftest_interp" ] && \
+		    kselftest_interp="$kselftest_interp "
 		eval kselftest_cmd_args="\$${kselftest_cmd_args_ref:-}"
-		cmd="$stdbuf ./$BASENAME_TEST $kselftest_cmd_args"
+		cmd="$stdbuf ./$kselftest_interp$BASENAME_TEST $kselftest_cmd_args"
 		if [ ! -x "$TEST" ]; then
 			echo "# Warning: file $TEST is not executable"
 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-28 16:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-27 19:32 [PATCH net-next RFC] selftests/net: integrate packetdrill with ksft Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-28  0:39 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-28 13:58   ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-28  8:20 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-08-28 14:03   ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-28 16:01     ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-08-28 19:33       ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-28 21:00         ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-30 15:20           ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-30 17:33             ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-30 18:47               ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-30 21:44                 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-30 21:52                   ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-09-01 21:15                     ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-09-02 16:46                       ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-09-02 16:56                         ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-09-02 20:50                           ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-09-05  3:27                   ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-30 21:46                 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-28 16:26     ` Matthieu Baerts
2024-08-28 15:01 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2024-08-28 15:36   ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-28 15:43   ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-28 17:20     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2024-08-28 18:23       ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-28 18:36         ` Stanislav Fomichev
2024-08-28 18:26 ` Mina Almasry
2024-08-28 18:39   ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240828090120.71be0b20@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martineau@kernel.org \
    --cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).