netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>,
	woojung.huh@microchip.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
	olteanv@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
	alsi@bang-olufsen.dk, justin.chen@broadcom.com,
	sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com,
	joabreu@synopsys.com, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, wens@csie.org,
	jernej.skrabec@gmail.com, samuel@sholland.org,
	hkallweit1@gmail.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
	ansuelsmth@gmail.com, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, jic23@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/13] net: Simplified with scoped function
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 11:10:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240828111045.11dfc157@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <71deb322-4b54-4c1c-a665-d9de84ea9baf@kernel.org>

On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 16:45:32 +0200 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28/08/2024 16:32, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 11:23:30AM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:  
> >> Simplify with scoped for each OF child loop and __free(), as well as
> >> dev_err_probe().
> >>
> >> Changes in v2:
> >> - Subject prefix: next -> net-next.
> >> - Split __free() from scoped for each OF child loop clean.
> >> - Fix use of_node_put() instead of __free() for the 5th patch.  
> > 
> > I personally think all these __free() are ugly and magical. Can it  
> 
> It is code readability so quite subjective. Jakub also rejected one of
> such __free() changes, so maybe all these cases here should be rejected?

Andrew's comments on refcounting on DT objects notwithstanding --
I do like the _scoped() iterator quite a bit, FWIW. I think it's one 
of the better uses of the auto-cleanup and local variable declarations.

Direct uses of __free() are more questionable in my opinion.

Using advanced constructs to build clean subsystem APIs is great,
sprinkling unreadable constructs to save LoC is what C++ is for. 
(Lets see how many people this offends ;))

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-08-28 18:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-28  3:23 [PATCH net-next v2 00/13] net: Simplified with scoped function Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-28  3:23 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/13] net: stmmac: dwmac-sun8i: Use for_each_child_of_node_scoped() Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-28 12:38   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-28 14:17   ` Andrew Lunn
2024-08-29  2:29     ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-28  3:23 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/13] net: stmmac: dwmac-sun8i: Use __free() to simplify code Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-28 12:38   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-28  3:23 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/13] net: dsa: realtek: Use for_each_child_of_node_scoped() Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-28 12:39   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-28  3:23 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/13] net: dsa: realtek: Use __free() to simplify code Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-28 12:37   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-28  3:23 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/13] net: phy: Fix missing of_node_put() for leds Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-28 12:40   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-28 15:45   ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-29  2:46     ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-29  2:52     ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-28  3:23 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/13] net: phy: Use for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-28 12:44   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-28  3:23 ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/13] net: mdio: mux-mmioreg: Simplified with scoped function Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-28 12:46   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-28  3:23 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/13] net: mdio: mux-mmioreg: Simplified with dev_err_probe() Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-28 12:48   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-29  3:11     ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-29 12:38       ` Andrew Lunn
2024-08-28  3:23 ` [PATCH net-next v2 09/13] net: mv643xx_eth: Simplify with scoped for each OF child loop Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-28 12:49   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-28  3:23 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/13] net: dsa: microchip: Use scoped function to simplfy code Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-28 12:50   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-28  3:23 ` [PATCH net-next v2 11/13] net: dsa: microchip: Use __free() " Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-28 12:50   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-28  3:23 ` [PATCH net-next v2 12/13] net: bcmasp: Simplify with scoped for each OF child loop Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-28 12:51   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-28  3:23 ` [PATCH net-next v2 13/13] net: bcmasp: Simplify with __free() Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-28 12:53   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-28 14:32 ` [PATCH net-next v2 00/13] net: Simplified with scoped function Andrew Lunn
2024-08-28 14:45   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-28 15:24     ` Andrew Lunn
2024-08-28 18:10     ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-08-29  3:26   ` Jinjie Ruan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240828111045.11dfc157@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=alsi@bang-olufsen.dk \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
    --cc=justin.chen@broadcom.com \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
    --cc=samuel@sholland.org \
    --cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    --cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).