netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org, willemb@google.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] tcp: make SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE feature per socket
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 00:01:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240828160145.68805-2-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240828160145.68805-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>

From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>

Normally, if we want to record and print the rx timestamp after
tcp_recvmsg_locked(), we must enable both SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE
and SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE flags, from which we also can notice
through running rxtimestamp binary in selftests (see testcase 7).

However, there is one particular case that fails the selftests with
"./rxtimestamp: Expected swtstamp to not be set." error printing in
testcase 6.

How does it happen? When we keep running a thread starting a socket
and set SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE option first, then running
./rxtimestamp, it will fail. The reason is the former thread
switching on netstamp_needed_key that makes the feature global,
every skb going through netif_receive_skb_list_internal() function
will get a current timestamp in net_timestamp_check(). So the skb
will have timestamp regardless of whether its socket option has
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE or not.

After this patch, we can pass the selftest and control each socket
as we want when using rx timestamp feature.

Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp.c | 11 +++++++++--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index 8514257f4ecd..5e88c765b9a1 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -2235,6 +2235,7 @@ void tcp_recv_timestamp(struct msghdr *msg, const struct sock *sk,
 			struct scm_timestamping_internal *tss)
 {
 	int new_tstamp = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TSTAMP_NEW);
+	u32 tsflags = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags);
 	bool has_timestamping = false;
 
 	if (tss->ts[0].tv_sec || tss->ts[0].tv_nsec) {
@@ -2274,14 +2275,20 @@ void tcp_recv_timestamp(struct msghdr *msg, const struct sock *sk,
 			}
 		}
 
-		if (READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags) & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE)
+		/* We have to use the generation flag here to test if we
+		 * allow the corresponding application to receive the rx
+		 * timestamp. Only using report flag does not hold for
+		 * receive timestamping case.
+		 */
+		if (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE &&
+		    tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE)
 			has_timestamping = true;
 		else
 			tss->ts[0] = (struct timespec64) {0};
 	}
 
 	if (tss->ts[2].tv_sec || tss->ts[2].tv_nsec) {
-		if (READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags) & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE)
+		if (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE)
 			has_timestamping = true;
 		else
 			tss->ts[2] = (struct timespec64) {0};
-- 
2.37.3


  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-28 16:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-28 16:01 [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] timestamp: control SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE feature per socket Jason Xing
2024-08-28 16:01 ` Jason Xing [this message]
2024-08-29 14:16   ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] tcp: make " Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-29 15:34     ` Jason Xing
2024-08-28 16:01 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] net: " Jason Xing
2024-08-29 10:02   ` Jason Xing
2024-08-29 14:21   ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-29 15:38     ` Jason Xing
2024-08-29 19:29   ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-30  0:40     ` Jason Xing
2024-08-30  2:14       ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-29 14:14 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] timestamp: control " Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-29 15:27   ` Jason Xing
2024-08-29 16:23     ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-29 17:45       ` Jason Xing
2024-08-29 18:15         ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-29 18:31           ` Jason Xing

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240828160145.68805-2-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
    --to=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).