From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org, willemb@google.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] tcp: make SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE feature per socket
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 00:01:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240828160145.68805-2-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240828160145.68805-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Normally, if we want to record and print the rx timestamp after
tcp_recvmsg_locked(), we must enable both SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE
and SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE flags, from which we also can notice
through running rxtimestamp binary in selftests (see testcase 7).
However, there is one particular case that fails the selftests with
"./rxtimestamp: Expected swtstamp to not be set." error printing in
testcase 6.
How does it happen? When we keep running a thread starting a socket
and set SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE option first, then running
./rxtimestamp, it will fail. The reason is the former thread
switching on netstamp_needed_key that makes the feature global,
every skb going through netif_receive_skb_list_internal() function
will get a current timestamp in net_timestamp_check(). So the skb
will have timestamp regardless of whether its socket option has
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE or not.
After this patch, we can pass the selftest and control each socket
as we want when using rx timestamp feature.
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
---
net/ipv4/tcp.c | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index 8514257f4ecd..5e88c765b9a1 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -2235,6 +2235,7 @@ void tcp_recv_timestamp(struct msghdr *msg, const struct sock *sk,
struct scm_timestamping_internal *tss)
{
int new_tstamp = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TSTAMP_NEW);
+ u32 tsflags = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags);
bool has_timestamping = false;
if (tss->ts[0].tv_sec || tss->ts[0].tv_nsec) {
@@ -2274,14 +2275,20 @@ void tcp_recv_timestamp(struct msghdr *msg, const struct sock *sk,
}
}
- if (READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags) & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE)
+ /* We have to use the generation flag here to test if we
+ * allow the corresponding application to receive the rx
+ * timestamp. Only using report flag does not hold for
+ * receive timestamping case.
+ */
+ if (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE &&
+ tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE)
has_timestamping = true;
else
tss->ts[0] = (struct timespec64) {0};
}
if (tss->ts[2].tv_sec || tss->ts[2].tv_nsec) {
- if (READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags) & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE)
+ if (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE)
has_timestamping = true;
else
tss->ts[2] = (struct timespec64) {0};
--
2.37.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-28 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-28 16:01 [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] timestamp: control SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE feature per socket Jason Xing
2024-08-28 16:01 ` Jason Xing [this message]
2024-08-29 14:16 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] tcp: make " Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-29 15:34 ` Jason Xing
2024-08-28 16:01 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] net: " Jason Xing
2024-08-29 10:02 ` Jason Xing
2024-08-29 14:21 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-29 15:38 ` Jason Xing
2024-08-29 19:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-30 0:40 ` Jason Xing
2024-08-30 2:14 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-29 14:14 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] timestamp: control " Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-29 15:27 ` Jason Xing
2024-08-29 16:23 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-29 17:45 ` Jason Xing
2024-08-29 18:15 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-29 18:31 ` Jason Xing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240828160145.68805-2-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--to=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).