* [PATCH net-next] tools: ynl: error check scanf() in a sample
@ 2024-08-28 17:36 Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-28 18:02 ` Simon Horman
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2024-08-28 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem
Cc: netdev, edumazet, pabeni, Jakub Kicinski, donald.hunter, sdf,
martin.lau, ast, nicolas.dichtel
Someone reported on GitHub that the YNL NIPA test is failing
when run locally. The test builds the tools, and it hits:
netdev.c:82:9: warning: ignoring return value of ‘scanf’ declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result]
82 | scanf("%d", &ifindex);
I can't repro this on my setups but error seems clear enough.
Link: https://github.com/linux-netdev/nipa/discussions/37
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
CC: donald.hunter@gmail.com
CC: sdf@fomichev.me
CC: martin.lau@kernel.org
CC: ast@kernel.org
CC: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com
---
tools/net/ynl/samples/netdev.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/net/ynl/samples/netdev.c b/tools/net/ynl/samples/netdev.c
index 3e7b29bd55d5..22609d44c89a 100644
--- a/tools/net/ynl/samples/netdev.c
+++ b/tools/net/ynl/samples/netdev.c
@@ -79,7 +79,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
goto err_close;
printf("Select ifc ($ifindex; or 0 = dump; or -2 ntf check): ");
- scanf("%d", &ifindex);
+ if (scanf("%d", &ifindex) != 1) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "Error: unable to parse input\n");
+ goto err_destroy;
+ }
if (ifindex > 0) {
struct netdev_dev_get_req *req;
@@ -119,6 +122,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
err_close:
fprintf(stderr, "YNL: %s\n", ys->err.msg);
+err_destroy:
ynl_sock_destroy(ys);
return 2;
}
--
2.46.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net-next] tools: ynl: error check scanf() in a sample
2024-08-28 17:36 [PATCH net-next] tools: ynl: error check scanf() in a sample Jakub Kicinski
@ 2024-08-28 18:02 ` Simon Horman
2024-08-29 19:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-29 7:21 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2024-08-29 19:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2024-08-28 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski
Cc: davem, netdev, edumazet, pabeni, donald.hunter, sdf, martin.lau,
ast, nicolas.dichtel
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 10:36:09AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Someone reported on GitHub that the YNL NIPA test is failing
> when run locally. The test builds the tools, and it hits:
>
> netdev.c:82:9: warning: ignoring return value of ‘scanf’ declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result]
> 82 | scanf("%d", &ifindex);
>
> I can't repro this on my setups but error seems clear enough.
>
> Link: https://github.com/linux-netdev/nipa/discussions/37
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Thanks, I have a similar patch in my local-queue.
I was able to reproduce the problem on Ubuntu 22.04,
although not on Fedora 40 or Debian Trixie.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net-next] tools: ynl: error check scanf() in a sample
2024-08-28 18:02 ` Simon Horman
@ 2024-08-29 19:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-29 20:52 ` Simon Horman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2024-08-29 19:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Simon Horman
Cc: davem, netdev, edumazet, pabeni, donald.hunter, sdf, martin.lau,
ast, nicolas.dichtel
On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 19:02:46 +0100 Simon Horman wrote:
> I was able to reproduce the problem on Ubuntu 22.04,
> although not on Fedora 40 or Debian Trixie.
Thanks for the info! Made me pause and consider putting the fix
in net, but it's just a warning..
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next] tools: ynl: error check scanf() in a sample
2024-08-29 19:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2024-08-29 20:52 ` Simon Horman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2024-08-29 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski
Cc: davem, netdev, edumazet, pabeni, donald.hunter, sdf, martin.lau,
ast, nicolas.dichtel
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 12:43:15PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 19:02:46 +0100 Simon Horman wrote:
> > I was able to reproduce the problem on Ubuntu 22.04,
> > although not on Fedora 40 or Debian Trixie.
>
> Thanks for the info! Made me pause and consider putting the fix
> in net, but it's just a warning..
Yes, it made me pause about sending my version of the patch.
But I think it is worth fixing.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next] tools: ynl: error check scanf() in a sample
2024-08-28 17:36 [PATCH net-next] tools: ynl: error check scanf() in a sample Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-28 18:02 ` Simon Horman
@ 2024-08-29 7:21 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2024-08-29 19:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Dichtel @ 2024-08-29 7:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski, davem
Cc: netdev, edumazet, pabeni, donald.hunter, sdf, martin.lau, ast
Le 28/08/2024 à 19:36, Jakub Kicinski a écrit :
> Someone reported on GitHub that the YNL NIPA test is failing
> when run locally. The test builds the tools, and it hits:
>
> netdev.c:82:9: warning: ignoring return value of ‘scanf’ declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result]
> 82 | scanf("%d", &ifindex);
>
> I can't repro this on my setups but error seems clear enough.
>
> Link: https://github.com/linux-netdev/nipa/discussions/37
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net-next] tools: ynl: error check scanf() in a sample
2024-08-28 17:36 [PATCH net-next] tools: ynl: error check scanf() in a sample Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-28 18:02 ` Simon Horman
2024-08-29 7:21 ` Nicolas Dichtel
@ 2024-08-29 19:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2024-08-29 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski
Cc: davem, netdev, edumazet, pabeni, donald.hunter, sdf, martin.lau,
ast, nicolas.dichtel
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 10:36:09 -0700 you wrote:
> Someone reported on GitHub that the YNL NIPA test is failing
> when run locally. The test builds the tools, and it hits:
>
> netdev.c:82:9: warning: ignoring return value of ‘scanf’ declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result]
> 82 | scanf("%d", &ifindex);
>
> I can't repro this on my setups but error seems clear enough.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next] tools: ynl: error check scanf() in a sample
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/3d8806f37d31
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-08-29 20:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-08-28 17:36 [PATCH net-next] tools: ynl: error check scanf() in a sample Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-28 18:02 ` Simon Horman
2024-08-29 19:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-29 20:52 ` Simon Horman
2024-08-29 7:21 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2024-08-29 19:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).