netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Yang Ruibin <11162571@vivo.com>,
	Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: alacritech: Partially revert "net: alacritech: Switch to use dev_err_probe()"
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 09:06:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240903080634.GP23170@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240902163610.17028-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 06:36:10PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> This reverts commit bf4d87f884fe8a4b6b61fe4d0e05f293d08df61c because it
> introduced dev_err_probe() in non-probe path, which is not desired.
> 
> In general, calling dev_err_probe() after successful probe in case of
> handling -EPROBE_DEFER error, will set deferred status on the device
> already probed.  This is however not a problem here now, because
> dev_err_probe() in affected places is used for handling errors from
> request_firmware(), which does not return -EPROBE_DEFER.  Still usage of
> dev_err_probe() in such case is not correct, because request_firmware()
> could once return -EPROBE_DEFER.
> 
> Fixes: bf4d87f884fe ("net: alacritech: Switch to use dev_err_probe()")
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> 
> ---
> 
> Changes in v2:
> 1. Update commit msg (Simon).

Thanks for the update, much appreciated.

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>

...

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-03  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-02 16:36 [PATCH v2] net: alacritech: Partially revert "net: alacritech: Switch to use dev_err_probe()" Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-03  8:06 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2024-09-03 22:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240903080634.GP23170@kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=11162571@vivo.com \
    --cc=LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).