From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>
Cc: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, jiri@resnulli.us, jacob.e.keller@intel.com,
liuhangbin@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tools/net/ynl: fix cli.py --subscribe feature
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 15:00:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240903150026.34de5a1d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD4GDZySRpq97nDG=UQq+C4jBdS-+Km4NjGNob7jrbtBW+SmOg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 3 Sep 2024 22:08:54 +0100 Donald Hunter wrote:
> > On Mon, 02 Sep 2024 10:51:13 +0100 Donald Hunter wrote:
> > > Reviewed-by: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>
> >
> > Any preference on passing self.rsp_by_value, vs .decode() accessing
> > ynl.rsp_by_value on its own?
>
> .decode() accessing ynl.rsp_by_value would be cleaner, but I am
> working on some notification fixes that might benefit from the map
> being passed as a parameter. The netlink-raw families use a msg id
> scheme that is neither unified nor directional. It's more like a mix
> of both where req and rsp use different values but notifications reuse
> the req values. I suspect that to fix that we'd need to introduce a
> dict for ntf_by_value and then the parameter would be context
> specific. OVS reuses req/rsp values for notifications as well, but it
> uses a unified scheme, and that's mostly a problem for ynl-gen-c.
I was worried you'd say it's ID reuse related. That is tricky business.
> We could choose the cleaner approach just now and revisit it as part of
> fixing notifications for netlink-raw?
That's my intuition; there's a non-zero chance that priorities will
change or we'll head in a different direction, and the extra arg will
stick around confusing readers.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-03 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-30 20:13 [PATCH net] tools/net/ynl: fix cli.py --subscribe feature Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2024-09-02 9:51 ` Donald Hunter
2024-09-03 20:01 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-09-03 21:08 ` Donald Hunter
2024-09-03 22:00 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-09-04 13:57 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240903150026.34de5a1d@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).