Re: [PATCH v2] net: enetc: Replace ifdef with IS_ENABLED

[Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>]

Hi Martyn,

On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 03:04:18PM +0100, Martyn Welch wrote:
> The enetc driver uses ifdefs when checking whether
> CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_PTP_CLOCK is enabled in a number of places. This works
> if the driver is compiled in but fails if the driver is available as a
> kernel module. Replace the instances of ifdef with use of the IS_ENABLED
> macro, that will evaluate as true when this feature is built as a kernel
> module and follows the kernel's coding style.
> 
> Cc: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
> Signed-off-by: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@collabora.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes since v1:
>   - Switched from preprocessor conditionals to normal C conditionals.

Thanks for the patch. Can you please send a v3 rebased on the latest
net-next, which now contains commit 3dd261ca7f84 ("net: enetc: Remove
setting of RX software timestamp")? The change needs rethinking a bit.

Also, could you git format-patch --subject-prefix="PATCH net-next v3"
next time? The networking subsystem tends to require that from patch
submitters, to indicate the tree that the patch should be applied to.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c
> index 5e684b23c5f5..a9402c1907bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c
> @@ -853,24 +853,25 @@ static int enetc_get_ts_info(struct net_device *ndev,
>  		info->phc_index = -1;
>  	}
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_PTP_CLOCK
> -	info->so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_HARDWARE |
> -				SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE |
> -				SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE |
> -				SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE |
> -				SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE |
> -				SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE;
> -
> -	info->tx_types = (1 << HWTSTAMP_TX_OFF) |
> -			 (1 << HWTSTAMP_TX_ON) |
> -			 (1 << HWTSTAMP_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC);
> -	info->rx_filters = (1 << HWTSTAMP_FILTER_NONE) |
> -			   (1 << HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL);
> -#else
> -	info->so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE |
> -				SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE |
> -				SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE;
> -#endif
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_PTP_CLOCK)) {
> +		info->so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_HARDWARE |
> +					SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE |
> +					SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE |
> +					SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE |
> +					SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE |
> +					SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE;
> +
> +		info->tx_types = (1 << HWTSTAMP_TX_OFF) |
> +				 (1 << HWTSTAMP_TX_ON) |
> +				 (1 << HWTSTAMP_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC);
> +		info->rx_filters = (1 << HWTSTAMP_FILTER_NONE) |
> +				   (1 << HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL);
> +	} else {
> +		info->so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE |
> +					SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE |
> +					SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE;
> +	}
> +

How about:

	if (!IS_ENABLED()) {
		info->so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE;
		return 0;
	}

	info->so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_HARDWARE |
				SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE |
				SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE |
				SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE;

	info->tx_types = (1 << HWTSTAMP_TX_OFF) |
			 (1 << HWTSTAMP_TX_ON) |
			 (1 << HWTSTAMP_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC);
	info->rx_filters = (1 << HWTSTAMP_FILTER_NONE) |
			   (1 << HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL);

	return 0;
?

I think I prefer the style with the early return.

>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.45.2