From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@gmail.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 net-next 3/4] af_unix: Move spin_lock() in manage_oob().
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 12:32:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240905193240.17565-4-kuniyu@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240905193240.17565-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
When OOB skb has been already consumed, manage_oob() returns the next
skb if exists. In such a case, we need to fall back to the else branch
below.
Then, we want to keep holding spin_lock(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock).
Let's move it out of if-else branch and add lightweight check before
spin_lock() for major use cases without OOB skb.
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
---
net/unix/af_unix.c | 15 +++++++--------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index 91d7877a1079..159d78fc3d14 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -2657,9 +2657,12 @@ static struct sk_buff *manage_oob(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk,
struct sk_buff *read_skb = NULL, *unread_skb = NULL;
struct unix_sock *u = unix_sk(sk);
- if (!unix_skb_len(skb)) {
- spin_lock(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+ if (likely(unix_skb_len(skb) && skb != READ_ONCE(u->oob_skb)))
+ return skb;
+ spin_lock(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+
+ if (!unix_skb_len(skb)) {
if (copied && (!u->oob_skb || skb == u->oob_skb)) {
skb = NULL;
} else if (flags & MSG_PEEK) {
@@ -2670,14 +2673,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *manage_oob(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk,
__skb_unlink(read_skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue);
}
- spin_unlock(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
-
- consume_skb(read_skb);
- return skb;
+ goto unlock;
}
- spin_lock(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
-
if (skb != u->oob_skb)
goto unlock;
@@ -2698,6 +2696,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *manage_oob(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk,
unlock:
spin_unlock(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+ consume_skb(read_skb);
kfree_skb(unread_skb);
return skb;
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-05 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-05 19:32 [PATCH v1 net-next 0/4] af_unix: Correct manage_oob() when OOB follows a consumed OOB Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-09-05 19:32 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 1/4] af_unix: Remove single nest in manage_oob() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-09-05 19:32 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 2/4] af_unix: Rename unlinked_skb " Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-09-05 19:32 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2024-09-05 19:32 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 4/4] af_unix: Don't return OOB skb " Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-09-10 0:20 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 0/4] af_unix: Correct manage_oob() when OOB follows a consumed OOB patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240905193240.17565-4-kuniyu@amazon.com \
--to=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).