From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B2B21C7B68 for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2024 09:09:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725613750; cv=none; b=umQF2EjF00NOqbAGaSyFcFvoYF9YzcQ9k88WPyX0N/bISgPKZy9yBmh8Cj/M/k8NROSICC02D2yVZeT3BV+XKbOKgpW3UlXxX/CVgJAnj7vChy0d4g3I8M88iSslFgXIEX1Q8pNXK7fIhKhbWp+a0UGe3vwCLaCN8hHwnEyng3I= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725613750; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kQnCn6UuRSmObUj2sDmdYIc+ehx2G6t88GoNv0oYrKQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=PJTpg/6Vgzqq3gMnbPN5geKgbNEzbBa7YkgeapGHXIu47StpNjAyW42zJiFpeqDOo/V5Uf6LZfwvgCw+/YJX0r49DwdnvcOJSkGoGv0oZt+kvZnFsuhmKI1QrG4YtxjatLAkQIRN9drzA8tE4Jf9+q2n34lxf+wgd12bMeUh9jQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=YFZZr+zM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="YFZZr+zM" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1725613747; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=D24mRm5LrUYTcb7xHC0WCD/VrAupd5O09gSa9Wcuxe8=; b=YFZZr+zMejmTvN8qfMvNv5TalZkKkz6cE3kI/YeOy5crxJUa8qWHtsTY709SHFOSQSwRzR boBhph/iyC4DkE3wVvEBx1rhn/Tv+CakcJggr9L0SXcFCWiVX+FyVQIINPrLBLWHBwsUOz fVDnBBg5H2kG4/FLXB3HFdj6aJhXA/4= Received: from mail-wr1-f72.google.com (mail-wr1-f72.google.com [209.85.221.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-592-moZOo5QOPi-2g4Tt9hLSLQ-1; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 05:09:06 -0400 X-MC-Unique: moZOo5QOPi-2g4Tt9hLSLQ-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f72.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-374b69e65e8so1116429f8f.0 for ; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 02:09:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1725613745; x=1726218545; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=D24mRm5LrUYTcb7xHC0WCD/VrAupd5O09gSa9Wcuxe8=; b=LDytcu4dwlEcf7ldBqGtFU6iK616wXtDX8zw6A/DeDf26WRfQXvQomN4cHI/bKa6ur 538Wig3LOAW1TBAdDgLDaW7sFyg93E5iJJ3cmHHW2aedjuhscvbcwjtz5/B+gFkJvXW3 DobIRJv8fRFVIwrh0nV0IPr3nbu/l0yQ1C7dd49hueD9F8wCTZQFoxDUWODcFGF9bmeK 0WjYaMgTzPeEYPY6Pk/h9UDTZTzb725v1VJ7dZAkwcI2+OpOaR8U5RPXPthd8M+KMuOn U5STaMNwKuopVhYhmtXYkQKIFQNDvEZ+mWS0jA6HeheXkbFfiV4AKmE2O2wnS10uGmZE xGOw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzWFKCXMxCpwoyrSJ2qUmz9qcdha7ebnbyw2+FOUxRPO11gGpcQ FkVG8Eyt7uNUuFOqw2nVzSHcwZmwT7TZbHnvWQ+UCGp8JXSo1l+7hLUL1012f5JApfMhBf27Q3D 6C8arMMPKITORV7nZs8a8IpA8WzJfPbPt1/oMg9ApAXcNB6SrMAJwSA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:edd2:0:b0:375:c4c7:c7ac with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-378896c8082mr1231866f8f.49.1725613745472; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 02:09:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGMD4aX16S9LZGKe4EPTwXGfS6x36Rfr8HE2zqgzih2SEOtsrLoz+17HThNjBLPwX/BHpiRNA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:edd2:0:b0:375:c4c7:c7ac with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-378896c8082mr1231823f8f.49.1725613744555; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 02:09:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com ([155.133.17.165]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-374cbbc8281sm12225923f8f.64.2024.09.06.02.08.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 06 Sep 2024 02:09:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 05:08:56 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Xuan Zhuo Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jason Wang , Eugenio =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E9rez?= , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , virtualization@lists.linux.dev, Si-Wei Liu , Darren Kenny Subject: Re: [PATCH net] virtio-net: fix overflow inside virtnet_rq_alloc Message-ID: <20240906045904-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20240820071913.68004-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> <20240906044143-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <1725612818.815039-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1725612818.815039-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 04:53:38PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote: > On Fri, 6 Sep 2024 04:43:29 -0400, "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 03:19:13PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote: > > > leads to regression on VM with the sysctl value of: > > > > > > - net.core.high_order_alloc_disable=1 > > > > > > which could see reliable crashes or scp failure (scp a file 100M in size > > > to VM): > > > > > > The issue is that the virtnet_rq_dma takes up 16 bytes at the beginning > > > of a new frag. When the frag size is larger than PAGE_SIZE, > > > everything is fine. However, if the frag is only one page and the > > > total size of the buffer and virtnet_rq_dma is larger than one page, an > > > overflow may occur. In this case, if an overflow is possible, I adjust > > > the buffer size. If net.core.high_order_alloc_disable=1, the maximum > > > buffer size is 4096 - 16. If net.core.high_order_alloc_disable=0, only > > > the first buffer of the frag is affected. > > > > > > Fixes: f9dac92ba908 ("virtio_ring: enable premapped mode whatever use_dma_api") > > > Reported-by: "Si-Wei Liu" > > > Closes: http://lore.kernel.org/all/8b20cc28-45a9-4643-8e87-ba164a540c0a@oracle.com > > > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo > > > > > > Guys where are we going with this? We have a crasher right now, > > if this is not fixed ASAP I'd have to revert a ton of > > work Xuan Zhuo just did. > > I think this patch can fix it and I tested it. > But Darren said this patch did not work. > I need more info about the crash that Darren encountered. > > Thanks. So what are we doing? Revert the whole pile for now? Seems to be a bit of a pity, but maybe that's the best we can do for this release. > > > > > > > --- > > > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 12 +++++++++--- > > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > > index c6af18948092..e5286a6da863 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > > @@ -918,9 +918,6 @@ static void *virtnet_rq_alloc(struct receive_queue *rq, u32 size, gfp_t gfp) > > > void *buf, *head; > > > dma_addr_t addr; > > > > > > - if (unlikely(!skb_page_frag_refill(size, alloc_frag, gfp))) > > > - return NULL; > > > - > > > head = page_address(alloc_frag->page); > > > > > > dma = head; > > > @@ -2421,6 +2418,9 @@ static int add_recvbuf_small(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq, > > > len = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(len) + > > > SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)); > > > > > > + if (unlikely(!skb_page_frag_refill(len, &rq->alloc_frag, gfp))) > > > + return -ENOMEM; > > > + > > > buf = virtnet_rq_alloc(rq, len, gfp); > > > if (unlikely(!buf)) > > > return -ENOMEM; > > > @@ -2521,6 +2521,12 @@ static int add_recvbuf_mergeable(struct virtnet_info *vi, > > > */ > > > len = get_mergeable_buf_len(rq, &rq->mrg_avg_pkt_len, room); > > > > > > + if (unlikely(!skb_page_frag_refill(len + room, alloc_frag, gfp))) > > > + return -ENOMEM; > > > + > > > + if (!alloc_frag->offset && len + room + sizeof(struct virtnet_rq_dma) > alloc_frag->size) > > > + len -= sizeof(struct virtnet_rq_dma); > > > + > > > buf = virtnet_rq_alloc(rq, len + room, gfp); > > > if (unlikely(!buf)) > > > return -ENOMEM; > > > -- > > > 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f > >