From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Gui-Dong Han <hanguidong02@outlook.com>
Cc: anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
baijiaju1990@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ice: Fix improper handling of refcount in ice_dpll_init_rclk_pins()
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 09:18:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240906081852.GB2097826@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SY8P300MB0460F0F4B5D0BC6768DCA466C0932@SY8P300MB0460.AUSP300.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 11:48:43AM +0000, Gui-Dong Han wrote:
> This patch addresses a reference count handling issue in the
> ice_dpll_init_rclk_pins() function. The function calls ice_dpll_get_pins(),
> which increments the reference count of the relevant resources. However,
> if the condition WARN_ON((!vsi || !vsi->netdev)) is met, the function
> currently returns an error without properly releasing the resources
> acquired by ice_dpll_get_pins(), leading to a reference count leak.
>
> To resolve this, the check has been moved to the top of the function. This
> ensures that the function verifies the state before any resources are
> acquired, avoiding the need for additional resource management in the
> error path.
>
> This bug was identified by an experimental static analysis tool developed
> by our team. The tool specializes in analyzing reference count operations
> and detecting potential issues where resources are not properly managed.
> In this case, the tool flagged the missing release operation as a
> potential problem, which led to the development of this patch.
>
> Fixes: d7999f5ea64b ("ice: implement dpll interface to control cgu")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Gui-Dong Han <hanguidong02@outlook.com>
> ---
> v2:
> * In this patch v2, the check for vsi and vsi->netdev has been moved to
> the top of the function to simplify error handling and avoid the need for
> resource unwinding.
> Thanks to Simon Horman for suggesting this improvement.
Thanks for the update,
I agree with your analysis and that the problem is introduced by
the cited commit.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-06 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-03 11:48 [PATCH v2] ice: Fix improper handling of refcount in ice_dpll_init_rclk_pins() Gui-Dong Han
2024-09-06 8:18 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2024-09-11 16:54 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Pucha, HimasekharX Reddy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240906081852.GB2097826@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hanguidong02@outlook.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).