netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org,
	willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, shuah@kernel.org,
	willemb@google.com
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v5 1/2] net-timestamp: introduce SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER flag
Date: Fri,  6 Sep 2024 17:56:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240906095640.77533-2-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240906095640.77533-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>

From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>

introduce a new flag SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER in the receive
path. User can set it with SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE to filter
out rx software timestamp report, especially after a process turns on
netstamp_needed_key which can time stamp every incoming skb.

Previously, we found out if an application starts first which turns on
netstamp_needed_key, then another one only passing SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE
could also get rx timestamp. Now we handle this case by introducing this
new flag without breaking users.

Quoting Willem to explain why we need the flag:
"why a process would want to request software timestamp reporting, but
not receive software timestamp generation. The only use I see is when
the application does request
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE | SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE."

Similarly, this new flag could also be used for hardware case where we
can set it with SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE, then we won't receive
hardware receive timestamp.

Another thing about errqueue in this patch I have a few words to say:
In this case, we need to handle the egress path carefully, or else
reporting the tx timestamp will fail. Egress path and ingress path will
finally call sock_recv_timestamp(). We have to distinguish them.
Errqueue is a good indicator to reflect the flow direction.

Suggested-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
---
v5
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240905071738.3725-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com/
1. squash the hardware case patch into this one (Willem)
2. update corresponding commit message and doc (Willem)
3. remove the limitation in sock_set_timestamping() and restore the
simplification branches. (Willem)

v4
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240830153751.86895-2-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com/
1. revise the commit message and doc (Willem)
2. simplify the test statement (Jakub)
3. add Willem's reviewed-by tag (Willem)

v3
1. Willem suggested this alternative way to solve the issue, so I
added his Suggested-by tag here. Thanks!
---
 Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/uapi/linux/net_tstamp.h           |  3 ++-
 net/ethtool/common.c                      |  1 +
 net/ipv4/tcp.c                            |  9 ++++++--
 net/socket.c                              | 10 +++++++--
 5 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst b/Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst
index 9c7773271393..ae122ae3df72 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst
+++ b/Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst
@@ -267,6 +267,33 @@ SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW:
   two separate messages will be looped to the socket's error queue,
   each containing just one timestamp.
 
+SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER:
+  Used to filter out software/hardware receive timestamps. Existing
+  applications can 1) set SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE only, or 2) set
+  SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE only because they implicitly came to
+  depend on another (usually daemon) process to enable receive
+  timestamps systemwide. Enabling the flag along with
+  SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE or SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE will not
+  report the software or hardware receive timestamp to the userspace
+  so that it can filter out the cases where 1) one process starts
+  first which turns on netstamp_needed_key through setting generation
+  flags like SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE, or 2) similarly one process
+  enables generating the hardware timestamp first like setting
+  SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE, then another one only passing report
+  flag could also get the receive timestamp.
+
+  If the new applications 1) enable the flag along with
+  SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE and SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE, or
+  2) enable it with SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE and
+  SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_HARDWARE, they will only receive software or
+  hardware transmit timestamp respectively.
+
+  If the new applications 1) enable the flag along with
+  SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE and SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE, or
+  2) enable it with SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE and
+  SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE, they will still receive software or
+  hardware receive timestamp respectively.
+
 New applications are encouraged to pass SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_ID to
 disambiguate timestamps and SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TSONLY to operate
 regardless of the setting of sysctl net.core.tstamp_allow_data.
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/net_tstamp.h b/include/uapi/linux/net_tstamp.h
index a2c66b3d7f0f..858339d1c1c4 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/net_tstamp.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/net_tstamp.h
@@ -32,8 +32,9 @@ enum {
 	SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW = (1<<14),
 	SOF_TIMESTAMPING_BIND_PHC = (1 << 15),
 	SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_ID_TCP = (1 << 16),
+	SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER = (1 << 17),
 
-	SOF_TIMESTAMPING_LAST = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_ID_TCP,
+	SOF_TIMESTAMPING_LAST = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER,
 	SOF_TIMESTAMPING_MASK = (SOF_TIMESTAMPING_LAST - 1) |
 				 SOF_TIMESTAMPING_LAST
 };
diff --git a/net/ethtool/common.c b/net/ethtool/common.c
index 781834ef57c3..6c245e59bbc1 100644
--- a/net/ethtool/common.c
+++ b/net/ethtool/common.c
@@ -427,6 +427,7 @@ const char sof_timestamping_names[][ETH_GSTRING_LEN] = {
 	[const_ilog2(SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW)]  = "option-tx-swhw",
 	[const_ilog2(SOF_TIMESTAMPING_BIND_PHC)]     = "bind-phc",
 	[const_ilog2(SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_ID_TCP)]   = "option-id-tcp",
+	[const_ilog2(SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER)] = "option-rx-filter",
 };
 static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(sof_timestamping_names) == __SOF_TIMESTAMPING_CNT);
 
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index 8a5680b4e786..e359a9161445 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -2235,6 +2235,7 @@ void tcp_recv_timestamp(struct msghdr *msg, const struct sock *sk,
 			struct scm_timestamping_internal *tss)
 {
 	int new_tstamp = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TSTAMP_NEW);
+	u32 tsflags = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags);
 	bool has_timestamping = false;
 
 	if (tss->ts[0].tv_sec || tss->ts[0].tv_nsec) {
@@ -2274,14 +2275,18 @@ void tcp_recv_timestamp(struct msghdr *msg, const struct sock *sk,
 			}
 		}
 
-		if (READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags) & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE)
+		if (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE &&
+		    (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE ||
+		     !(tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER)))
 			has_timestamping = true;
 		else
 			tss->ts[0] = (struct timespec64) {0};
 	}
 
 	if (tss->ts[2].tv_sec || tss->ts[2].tv_nsec) {
-		if (READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags) & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE)
+		if (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE &&
+		    (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE ||
+		     !(tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER)))
 			has_timestamping = true;
 		else
 			tss->ts[2] = (struct timespec64) {0};
diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
index fcbdd5bc47ac..1c2fd1a317af 100644
--- a/net/socket.c
+++ b/net/socket.c
@@ -946,11 +946,17 @@ void __sock_recv_timestamp(struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *sk,
 
 	memset(&tss, 0, sizeof(tss));
 	tsflags = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags);
-	if ((tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE) &&
+	if ((tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE &&
+	     (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE ||
+	     skb_is_err_queue(skb) ||
+	     !(tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER))) &&
 	    ktime_to_timespec64_cond(skb->tstamp, tss.ts + 0))
 		empty = 0;
 	if (shhwtstamps &&
-	    (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE) &&
+	    (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE &&
+	    (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE ||
+	    skb_is_err_queue(skb) ||
+	    !(tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER))) &&
 	    !skb_is_swtx_tstamp(skb, false_tstamp)) {
 		if_index = 0;
 		if (skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP_NETDEV)
-- 
2.37.3


  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-06  9:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-06  9:56 [PATCH net-next v5 0/2] net-timestamp: introduce a flag to filter out rx software and hardware report Jason Xing
2024-09-06  9:56 ` Jason Xing [this message]
2024-09-06 23:24   ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/2] net-timestamp: introduce SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER flag Willem de Bruijn
2024-09-07  1:23     ` Jason Xing
2024-09-07  1:45       ` Jason Xing
2024-09-07  2:34       ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-09-07  3:11         ` Jason Xing
2024-09-08 19:41           ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-09-08 23:29             ` Jason Xing
2024-09-06  9:56 ` [PATCH net-next v5 2/2] net-timestamp: add selftests for SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER Jason Xing

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240906095640.77533-2-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
    --to=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).