From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org,
willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, shuah@kernel.org,
willemb@google.com
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v5 1/2] net-timestamp: introduce SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER flag
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 17:56:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240906095640.77533-2-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240906095640.77533-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
introduce a new flag SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER in the receive
path. User can set it with SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE to filter
out rx software timestamp report, especially after a process turns on
netstamp_needed_key which can time stamp every incoming skb.
Previously, we found out if an application starts first which turns on
netstamp_needed_key, then another one only passing SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE
could also get rx timestamp. Now we handle this case by introducing this
new flag without breaking users.
Quoting Willem to explain why we need the flag:
"why a process would want to request software timestamp reporting, but
not receive software timestamp generation. The only use I see is when
the application does request
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE | SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE."
Similarly, this new flag could also be used for hardware case where we
can set it with SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE, then we won't receive
hardware receive timestamp.
Another thing about errqueue in this patch I have a few words to say:
In this case, we need to handle the egress path carefully, or else
reporting the tx timestamp will fail. Egress path and ingress path will
finally call sock_recv_timestamp(). We have to distinguish them.
Errqueue is a good indicator to reflect the flow direction.
Suggested-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
---
v5
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240905071738.3725-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com/
1. squash the hardware case patch into this one (Willem)
2. update corresponding commit message and doc (Willem)
3. remove the limitation in sock_set_timestamping() and restore the
simplification branches. (Willem)
v4
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240830153751.86895-2-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com/
1. revise the commit message and doc (Willem)
2. simplify the test statement (Jakub)
3. add Willem's reviewed-by tag (Willem)
v3
1. Willem suggested this alternative way to solve the issue, so I
added his Suggested-by tag here. Thanks!
---
Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++
include/uapi/linux/net_tstamp.h | 3 ++-
net/ethtool/common.c | 1 +
net/ipv4/tcp.c | 9 ++++++--
net/socket.c | 10 +++++++--
5 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst b/Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst
index 9c7773271393..ae122ae3df72 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst
+++ b/Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst
@@ -267,6 +267,33 @@ SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW:
two separate messages will be looped to the socket's error queue,
each containing just one timestamp.
+SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER:
+ Used to filter out software/hardware receive timestamps. Existing
+ applications can 1) set SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE only, or 2) set
+ SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE only because they implicitly came to
+ depend on another (usually daemon) process to enable receive
+ timestamps systemwide. Enabling the flag along with
+ SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE or SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE will not
+ report the software or hardware receive timestamp to the userspace
+ so that it can filter out the cases where 1) one process starts
+ first which turns on netstamp_needed_key through setting generation
+ flags like SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE, or 2) similarly one process
+ enables generating the hardware timestamp first like setting
+ SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE, then another one only passing report
+ flag could also get the receive timestamp.
+
+ If the new applications 1) enable the flag along with
+ SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE and SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE, or
+ 2) enable it with SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE and
+ SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_HARDWARE, they will only receive software or
+ hardware transmit timestamp respectively.
+
+ If the new applications 1) enable the flag along with
+ SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE and SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE, or
+ 2) enable it with SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE and
+ SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE, they will still receive software or
+ hardware receive timestamp respectively.
+
New applications are encouraged to pass SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_ID to
disambiguate timestamps and SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TSONLY to operate
regardless of the setting of sysctl net.core.tstamp_allow_data.
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/net_tstamp.h b/include/uapi/linux/net_tstamp.h
index a2c66b3d7f0f..858339d1c1c4 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/net_tstamp.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/net_tstamp.h
@@ -32,8 +32,9 @@ enum {
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW = (1<<14),
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_BIND_PHC = (1 << 15),
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_ID_TCP = (1 << 16),
+ SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER = (1 << 17),
- SOF_TIMESTAMPING_LAST = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_ID_TCP,
+ SOF_TIMESTAMPING_LAST = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER,
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_MASK = (SOF_TIMESTAMPING_LAST - 1) |
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_LAST
};
diff --git a/net/ethtool/common.c b/net/ethtool/common.c
index 781834ef57c3..6c245e59bbc1 100644
--- a/net/ethtool/common.c
+++ b/net/ethtool/common.c
@@ -427,6 +427,7 @@ const char sof_timestamping_names[][ETH_GSTRING_LEN] = {
[const_ilog2(SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW)] = "option-tx-swhw",
[const_ilog2(SOF_TIMESTAMPING_BIND_PHC)] = "bind-phc",
[const_ilog2(SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_ID_TCP)] = "option-id-tcp",
+ [const_ilog2(SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER)] = "option-rx-filter",
};
static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(sof_timestamping_names) == __SOF_TIMESTAMPING_CNT);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index 8a5680b4e786..e359a9161445 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -2235,6 +2235,7 @@ void tcp_recv_timestamp(struct msghdr *msg, const struct sock *sk,
struct scm_timestamping_internal *tss)
{
int new_tstamp = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TSTAMP_NEW);
+ u32 tsflags = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags);
bool has_timestamping = false;
if (tss->ts[0].tv_sec || tss->ts[0].tv_nsec) {
@@ -2274,14 +2275,18 @@ void tcp_recv_timestamp(struct msghdr *msg, const struct sock *sk,
}
}
- if (READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags) & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE)
+ if (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE &&
+ (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE ||
+ !(tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER)))
has_timestamping = true;
else
tss->ts[0] = (struct timespec64) {0};
}
if (tss->ts[2].tv_sec || tss->ts[2].tv_nsec) {
- if (READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags) & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE)
+ if (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE &&
+ (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE ||
+ !(tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER)))
has_timestamping = true;
else
tss->ts[2] = (struct timespec64) {0};
diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
index fcbdd5bc47ac..1c2fd1a317af 100644
--- a/net/socket.c
+++ b/net/socket.c
@@ -946,11 +946,17 @@ void __sock_recv_timestamp(struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *sk,
memset(&tss, 0, sizeof(tss));
tsflags = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags);
- if ((tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE) &&
+ if ((tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE &&
+ (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE ||
+ skb_is_err_queue(skb) ||
+ !(tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER))) &&
ktime_to_timespec64_cond(skb->tstamp, tss.ts + 0))
empty = 0;
if (shhwtstamps &&
- (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE) &&
+ (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE &&
+ (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE ||
+ skb_is_err_queue(skb) ||
+ !(tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER))) &&
!skb_is_swtx_tstamp(skb, false_tstamp)) {
if_index = 0;
if (skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP_NETDEV)
--
2.37.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-06 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-06 9:56 [PATCH net-next v5 0/2] net-timestamp: introduce a flag to filter out rx software and hardware report Jason Xing
2024-09-06 9:56 ` Jason Xing [this message]
2024-09-06 23:24 ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/2] net-timestamp: introduce SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER flag Willem de Bruijn
2024-09-07 1:23 ` Jason Xing
2024-09-07 1:45 ` Jason Xing
2024-09-07 2:34 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-09-07 3:11 ` Jason Xing
2024-09-08 19:41 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-09-08 23:29 ` Jason Xing
2024-09-06 9:56 ` [PATCH net-next v5 2/2] net-timestamp: add selftests for SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER Jason Xing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240906095640.77533-2-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--to=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).