* [PATCH net-next v3] net: enetc: Replace ifdef with IS_ENABLED
@ 2024-09-04 10:51 Martyn Welch
2024-09-04 11:11 ` Vadim Fedorenko
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Martyn Welch @ 2024-09-04 10:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Claudiu Manoil, Vladimir Oltean, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni
Cc: kernel, Martyn Welch, Vadim Fedorenko, netdev, linux-kernel
The enetc driver uses ifdefs when checking whether
CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_PTP_CLOCK is enabled in a number of places. This works
if the driver is compiled in but fails if the driver is available as a
kernel module. Replace the instances of ifdef with use of the IS_ENABLED
macro, that will evaluate as true when this feature is built as a kernel
module and follows the kernel's coding style.
Signed-off-by: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
---
Changes since v1:
- Switched from preprocessor conditionals to normal C conditionals.
Changes since v2:
- Reworked enetc_ethtool.c changes to fit around changes merged in
net-next.
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c | 34 +++++++++----------
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h | 9 ++---
.../ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c | 12 ++++---
3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
index 5c45f42232d3..361464a5b6c4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
@@ -977,10 +977,9 @@ static int enetc_refill_rx_ring(struct enetc_bdr *rx_ring, const int buff_cnt)
return j;
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_PTP_CLOCK
-static void enetc_get_rx_tstamp(struct net_device *ndev,
- union enetc_rx_bd *rxbd,
- struct sk_buff *skb)
+static void __maybe_unused enetc_get_rx_tstamp(struct net_device *ndev,
+ union enetc_rx_bd *rxbd,
+ struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct skb_shared_hwtstamps *shhwtstamps = skb_hwtstamps(skb);
struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
@@ -1001,7 +1000,6 @@ static void enetc_get_rx_tstamp(struct net_device *ndev,
shhwtstamps->hwtstamp = ns_to_ktime(tstamp);
}
}
-#endif
static void enetc_get_offloads(struct enetc_bdr *rx_ring,
union enetc_rx_bd *rxbd, struct sk_buff *skb)
@@ -1041,10 +1039,9 @@ static void enetc_get_offloads(struct enetc_bdr *rx_ring,
__vlan_hwaccel_put_tag(skb, tpid, le16_to_cpu(rxbd->r.vlan_opt));
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_PTP_CLOCK
- if (priv->active_offloads & ENETC_F_RX_TSTAMP)
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_PTP_CLOCK) &&
+ (priv->active_offloads & ENETC_F_RX_TSTAMP))
enetc_get_rx_tstamp(rx_ring->ndev, rxbd, skb);
-#endif
}
/* This gets called during the non-XDP NAPI poll cycle as well as on XDP_PASS,
@@ -2882,8 +2879,8 @@ void enetc_set_features(struct net_device *ndev, netdev_features_t features)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_set_features);
-#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_PTP_CLOCK
-static int enetc_hwtstamp_set(struct net_device *ndev, struct ifreq *ifr)
+static int __maybe_unused enetc_hwtstamp_set(struct net_device *ndev,
+ struct ifreq *ifr)
{
struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
int err, new_offloads = priv->active_offloads;
@@ -2931,7 +2928,8 @@ static int enetc_hwtstamp_set(struct net_device *ndev, struct ifreq *ifr)
-EFAULT : 0;
}
-static int enetc_hwtstamp_get(struct net_device *ndev, struct ifreq *ifr)
+static int __maybe_unused enetc_hwtstamp_get(struct net_device *ndev,
+ struct ifreq *ifr)
{
struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
struct hwtstamp_config config;
@@ -2951,17 +2949,17 @@ static int enetc_hwtstamp_get(struct net_device *ndev, struct ifreq *ifr)
return copy_to_user(ifr->ifr_data, &config, sizeof(config)) ?
-EFAULT : 0;
}
-#endif
int enetc_ioctl(struct net_device *ndev, struct ifreq *rq, int cmd)
{
struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
-#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_PTP_CLOCK
- if (cmd == SIOCSHWTSTAMP)
- return enetc_hwtstamp_set(ndev, rq);
- if (cmd == SIOCGHWTSTAMP)
- return enetc_hwtstamp_get(ndev, rq);
-#endif
+
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_PTP_CLOCK)) {
+ if (cmd == SIOCSHWTSTAMP)
+ return enetc_hwtstamp_set(ndev, rq);
+ if (cmd == SIOCGHWTSTAMP)
+ return enetc_hwtstamp_get(ndev, rq);
+ }
if (!priv->phylink)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
index a9c2ff22431c..97524dfa234c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
@@ -184,10 +184,9 @@ static inline union enetc_rx_bd *enetc_rxbd(struct enetc_bdr *rx_ring, int i)
{
int hw_idx = i;
-#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_PTP_CLOCK
- if (rx_ring->ext_en)
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_PTP_CLOCK) && rx_ring->ext_en)
hw_idx = 2 * i;
-#endif
+
return &(((union enetc_rx_bd *)rx_ring->bd_base)[hw_idx]);
}
@@ -199,10 +198,8 @@ static inline void enetc_rxbd_next(struct enetc_bdr *rx_ring,
new_rxbd++;
-#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_PTP_CLOCK
- if (rx_ring->ext_en)
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_PTP_CLOCK) && rx_ring->ext_en)
new_rxbd++;
-#endif
if (unlikely(++new_index == rx_ring->bd_count)) {
new_rxbd = rx_ring->bd_base;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c
index 47c478e08d44..2563eb8ac7b6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c
@@ -851,7 +851,12 @@ static int enetc_get_ts_info(struct net_device *ndev,
symbol_put(enetc_phc_index);
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_PTP_CLOCK
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_PTP_CLOCK)) {
+ info->so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE;
+
+ return 0;
+ }
+
info->so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_HARDWARE |
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE |
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE |
@@ -860,11 +865,10 @@ static int enetc_get_ts_info(struct net_device *ndev,
info->tx_types = (1 << HWTSTAMP_TX_OFF) |
(1 << HWTSTAMP_TX_ON) |
(1 << HWTSTAMP_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC);
+
info->rx_filters = (1 << HWTSTAMP_FILTER_NONE) |
(1 << HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL);
-#else
- info->so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE;
-#endif
+
return 0;
}
--
2.45.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: enetc: Replace ifdef with IS_ENABLED
2024-09-04 10:51 [PATCH net-next v3] net: enetc: Replace ifdef with IS_ENABLED Martyn Welch
@ 2024-09-04 11:11 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2024-09-04 11:13 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-09-04 12:55 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-09-07 1:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Vadim Fedorenko @ 2024-09-04 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martyn Welch, Claudiu Manoil, Vladimir Oltean, David S. Miller,
Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni
Cc: kernel, netdev, linux-kernel
On 04/09/2024 11:51, Martyn Welch wrote:
> The enetc driver uses ifdefs when checking whether
> CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_PTP_CLOCK is enabled in a number of places. This works
> if the driver is compiled in but fails if the driver is available as a
> kernel module. Replace the instances of ifdef with use of the IS_ENABLED
> macro, that will evaluate as true when this feature is built as a kernel
> module and follows the kernel's coding style.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@collabora.com>
> Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
If there will be v4, please, put yours SoB as the last tag after all
other tags.
Thanks,
Vadim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: enetc: Replace ifdef with IS_ENABLED
2024-09-04 11:11 ` Vadim Fedorenko
@ 2024-09-04 11:13 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-09-04 13:01 ` Vadim Fedorenko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Oltean @ 2024-09-04 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vadim Fedorenko
Cc: Martyn Welch, Claudiu Manoil, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, kernel, netdev, linux-kernel
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 12:11:31PM +0100, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> On 04/09/2024 11:51, Martyn Welch wrote:
> > The enetc driver uses ifdefs when checking whether
> > CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_PTP_CLOCK is enabled in a number of places. This works
> > if the driver is compiled in but fails if the driver is available as a
> > kernel module. Replace the instances of ifdef with use of the IS_ENABLED
> > macro, that will evaluate as true when this feature is built as a kernel
> > module and follows the kernel's coding style.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@collabora.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
>
> If there will be v4, please, put yours SoB as the last tag after all
> other tags.
>
> Thanks,
> Vadim
What's the deal with this? If I give my review tag now, and the patch
will subsequently be applied, my Reviewed-by: tag will also appear after
his SoB.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: enetc: Replace ifdef with IS_ENABLED
2024-09-04 10:51 [PATCH net-next v3] net: enetc: Replace ifdef with IS_ENABLED Martyn Welch
2024-09-04 11:11 ` Vadim Fedorenko
@ 2024-09-04 12:55 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-09-07 1:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Oltean @ 2024-09-04 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martyn Welch
Cc: Claudiu Manoil, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski,
Paolo Abeni, kernel, Vadim Fedorenko, netdev, linux-kernel
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 11:51:41AM +0100, Martyn Welch wrote:
> The enetc driver uses ifdefs when checking whether
> CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_PTP_CLOCK is enabled in a number of places. This works
> if the driver is compiled in but fails if the driver is available as a
> kernel module. Replace the instances of ifdef with use of the IS_ENABLED
> macro, that will evaluate as true when this feature is built as a kernel
> module and follows the kernel's coding style.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@collabora.com>
> Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: enetc: Replace ifdef with IS_ENABLED
2024-09-04 11:13 ` Vladimir Oltean
@ 2024-09-04 13:01 ` Vadim Fedorenko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Vadim Fedorenko @ 2024-09-04 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vladimir Oltean
Cc: Martyn Welch, Claudiu Manoil, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, kernel, netdev, linux-kernel
On 04/09/2024 12:13, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 12:11:31PM +0100, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
>> On 04/09/2024 11:51, Martyn Welch wrote:
>>> The enetc driver uses ifdefs when checking whether
>>> CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_PTP_CLOCK is enabled in a number of places. This works
>>> if the driver is compiled in but fails if the driver is available as a
>>> kernel module. Replace the instances of ifdef with use of the IS_ENABLED
>>> macro, that will evaluate as true when this feature is built as a kernel
>>> module and follows the kernel's coding style.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@collabora.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
>>
>> If there will be v4, please, put yours SoB as the last tag after all
>> other tags.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vadim
>
> What's the deal with this? If I give my review tag now, and the patch
> will subsequently be applied, my Reviewed-by: tag will also appear after
> his SoB.
I think it was discussed several times on the mailing list already,
the latest discussion was recently in this thread:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240903072417.GN23170@kernel.org/
But I have also seen this suggestion from different maintainers.
As you said that if the patch will be applied the tags will go in
historical order. In case of re-submission, historically Reviewed-by
will be earlier in time line, so should be before SoB, AFAIU.
Thanks,
Vadim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: enetc: Replace ifdef with IS_ENABLED
2024-09-04 10:51 [PATCH net-next v3] net: enetc: Replace ifdef with IS_ENABLED Martyn Welch
2024-09-04 11:11 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2024-09-04 12:55 ` Vladimir Oltean
@ 2024-09-07 1:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-09-12 14:01 ` Martyn Welch
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2024-09-07 1:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martyn Welch
Cc: Claudiu Manoil, Vladimir Oltean, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Paolo Abeni, kernel, Vadim Fedorenko, netdev, linux-kernel
On Wed, 4 Sep 2024 11:51:41 +0100 Martyn Welch wrote:
> -#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_PTP_CLOCK
> -static void enetc_get_rx_tstamp(struct net_device *ndev,
> - union enetc_rx_bd *rxbd,
> - struct sk_buff *skb)
> +static void __maybe_unused enetc_get_rx_tstamp(struct net_device *ndev,
> + union enetc_rx_bd *rxbd,
> + struct sk_buff *skb)
Are you sure you need the __maybe_used's ?
Nice thing about the IS_ENABLED() is that the code is still visible to
the compiler, even if dead code elimination removes it the compiler
shouldn't really warn about unused code.
--
pw-bot: cr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: enetc: Replace ifdef with IS_ENABLED
2024-09-07 1:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2024-09-12 14:01 ` Martyn Welch
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Martyn Welch @ 2024-09-12 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski
Cc: Claudiu Manoil, Vladimir Oltean, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Paolo Abeni, kernel, Vadim Fedorenko, netdev, linux-kernel
On Fri, 2024-09-06 at 18:20 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Sep 2024 11:51:41 +0100 Martyn Welch wrote:
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_PTP_CLOCK
> > -static void enetc_get_rx_tstamp(struct net_device *ndev,
> > - union enetc_rx_bd *rxbd,
> > - struct sk_buff *skb)
> > +static void __maybe_unused enetc_get_rx_tstamp(struct net_device
> > *ndev,
> > + union enetc_rx_bd
> > *rxbd,
> > + struct sk_buff
> > *skb)
>
> Are you sure you need the __maybe_used's ?
> Nice thing about the IS_ENABLED() is that the code is still visible
> to
> the compiler, even if dead code elimination removes it the compiler
> shouldn't really warn about unused code.
Hi Jakub,
I thought that was required, but upon re-reading the Linux kernel
coding style documentation on the subject, I see that I miss-
understood. I will check and see.
Martyn
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-09-12 14:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-09-04 10:51 [PATCH net-next v3] net: enetc: Replace ifdef with IS_ENABLED Martyn Welch
2024-09-04 11:11 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2024-09-04 11:13 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-09-04 13:01 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2024-09-04 12:55 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-09-07 1:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-09-12 14:01 ` Martyn Welch
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).