From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92487139CF6; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 15:17:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725895038; cv=none; b=LdB3Nk88p6oYxHrXIveVhEQtpqG6S3A03/Jj7rdC6NWzOLE+35Vau/aO0l7nrnZsIHJ/N9e/SQJDO3hAgJ1hL4Drw4B2uVoGwVrB8yuEw0NTwVDSAQa7F0NEeRugc/nURwUPmgUQjOnvlF27grIaflrwWHm2KHFmVuza7ShqB50= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725895038; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4UnHiTSmesifrapU4hY+D7bZkm176mfI1MGT9K3EfJU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=BEUyG5iYKATHC3hAw4U11WKshi30whr0DpGdIRZ2yLmGrClktjGanttb4SjTrEJhKBJI5z6d6ayJZrUf6SLUMVe3pbGeWbbO8qH1uDlDluD0ucfx2qgXVX3PmYuZUyJl4slWlGOYMJdQocWLI9ROibbiaA/qCW+mjJmz/3CuaFM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=i7YNXVJn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="i7YNXVJn" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DAC3BC4CEC5; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 15:17:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1725895038; bh=4UnHiTSmesifrapU4hY+D7bZkm176mfI1MGT9K3EfJU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=i7YNXVJn8mr9u3JIms5lk+k+0EzePN3dufNOrxgBDlOeiNGUgv9H1DPzP/hVyfXz3 8GQPnUs7e7O/fgP9sikPQRa0V4ZunBXutjASuST+9zmflFiqLsb5OfsahR75KyybqP x8uV+TjA4dwXr19Kxsjl0VvRU8QNJZF2dLGZpUwOHJyE5hq1r/rrCHFbvyZjbW3ysj m069t3GrumzbDer2HEz31i/caWeK0y5bXNi2tlbSjo4HS350D7cwczQLl4YBkdATxA 1cPvXLTpY++jkiCI5d1RrH0+VYI1ghZT0wNSlghgnuRFRAt7RozHimqJ8thKy2Mavk plHpgn0RD9iwg== Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 16:17:12 +0100 From: Simon Horman To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso , Felix Huettner , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev, Jozsef Kadlecsik , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Bill Wendling , Justin Stitt Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1 1/1] netfilter: conntrack: Guard possoble unused functions Message-ID: <20240909151712.GZ2097826@kernel.org> References: <20240905203612.333421-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20240906162938.GH2097826@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 12:37:51PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 05:29:38PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 11:36:12PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > Local testing seems to show that the warning is still emitted > > for ctnetlink_label_size if CONFIG_NETFILTER_NETLINK_GLUE_CT is enabled > > but CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_EVENTS is not. > > Can you elaborate on this, please? > I can not reproduce. Sure, let me retest and get back to you.