From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, thepacketgeek@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
davej@codemonkey.org.uk, vlad.wing@gmail.com, max@kutsevol.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 04/10] net: netconsole: rename body to msg_body
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 17:03:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240909160303.GC2097826@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240909130756.2722126-5-leitao@debian.org>
On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 06:07:45AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> With the introduction of the userdata concept, the term body has become
> ambiguous and less intuitive.
>
> To improve clarity, body is renamed to msg_body, making it clear that
> the body is not the only content following the header.
>
> In an upcoming patch, the term body_len will also be revised for further
> clarity.
>
> The current packet structure is as follows:
>
> release, header, body, [msg_body + userdata]
>
> Here, [msg_body + userdata] collectively forms what is currently
> referred to as "body." This renaming helps to distinguish and better
> understand each component of the packet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/netconsole.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/netconsole.c b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> index 8faea9422ea1..c312ad6d5cf8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> @@ -1092,22 +1092,22 @@ static void send_msg_fragmented(struct netconsole_target *nt,
> {
> static char buf[MAX_PRINT_CHUNK]; /* protected by target_list_lock */
> int offset = 0, userdata_len = 0;
> - const char *header, *body;
> - int header_len, body_len;
> + const char *header, *msgbody;
> + int header_len, msgbody_len;
> const char *release;
>
> if (userdata)
> userdata_len = nt->userdata_length;
>
> - /* need to insert extra header fields, detect header and body */
> + /* need to insert extra header fields, detect header and msgbody */
> header = msg;
> - body = memchr(msg, ';', msg_len);
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!body))
> + msgbody = memchr(msg, ';', msg_len);
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!msgbody))
> return;
>
> - header_len = body - header;
> - body_len = msg_len - header_len - 1;
> - body++;
> + header_len = msgbody - header;
> + msgbody_len = msg_len - header_len - 1;
> + msgbody++;
>
> /*
> * Transfer multiple chunks with the following extra header.
> @@ -1122,10 +1122,10 @@ static void send_msg_fragmented(struct netconsole_target *nt,
> memcpy(buf + release_len, header, header_len);
> header_len += release_len;
>
> - /* for now on, the header will be persisted, and the body
> + /* for now on, the header will be persisted, and the msgbody
> * will be replaced
> */
> - while (offset < body_len + userdata_len) {
> + while (offset < msgbody_len + userdata_len) {
> int this_header = header_len;
> int this_offset = 0;
> int this_chunk = 0;
> @@ -1133,23 +1133,31 @@ static void send_msg_fragmented(struct netconsole_target *nt,
> this_header += scnprintf(buf + this_header,
> sizeof(buf) - this_header,
> ",ncfrag=%d/%d;", offset,
> - body_len + userdata_len);
> + msgbody_len + userdata_len);
>
> - /* Not all body data has been written yet */
> - if (offset < body_len) {
> - this_chunk = min(body_len - offset,
> + /* Not all msgbody data has been written yet */
> + if (offset < msgbody_len) {
> + this_chunk = min(msgbody_len - offset,
> MAX_PRINT_CHUNK - this_header);
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(this_chunk <= 0))
> return;
> - memcpy(buf + this_header, body + offset, this_chunk);
> + memcpy(buf + this_header, msgbody + offset, this_chunk);
> this_offset += this_chunk;
> }
> - /* Body is fully written and there is pending userdata to write,
> - * append userdata in this chunk
> +
> + if (offset + this_offset >= msgbody_len)
> + /* msgbody was finally written, either in the previous
> + * messages and/or in the current buf. Time to write
> + * the userdata.
> + */
> + msgbody_written = true;
Something went a bit wrong somewhere, msgbody_written isn't declared
in this scope.
> +
> + /* Msg body is fully written and there is pending userdata to
> + * write, append userdata in this chunk
> */
> - if (offset + this_offset >= body_len &&
> - offset + this_offset < userdata_len + body_len) {
> - int sent_userdata = (offset + this_offset) - body_len;
> + if (offset + this_offset >= msgbody_len &&
> + offset + this_offset < userdata_len + msgbody_len) {
> + int sent_userdata = (offset + this_offset) - msgbody_len;
> int preceding_bytes = this_chunk + this_header;
>
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(sent_userdata < 0))
--
pw-bot: cr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-09 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-09 13:07 [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] netconsole refactoring and warning fix Breno Leitao
2024-09-09 13:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/10] net: netconsole: remove msg_ready variable Breno Leitao
2024-09-09 13:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/10] net: netconsole: split send_ext_msg_udp() function Breno Leitao
2024-09-09 15:58 ` Simon Horman
2024-09-09 13:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/10] net: netconsole: separate fragmented message handling in send_ext_msg Breno Leitao
2024-09-09 13:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/10] net: netconsole: rename body to msg_body Breno Leitao
2024-09-09 16:03 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2024-09-09 13:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/10] net: netconsole: introduce variable to track body length Breno Leitao
2024-09-09 13:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/10] net: netconsole: track explicitly if msgbody was written to buffer Breno Leitao
2024-09-09 13:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/10] net: netconsole: extract release appending into separate function Breno Leitao
2024-09-09 13:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/10] net: netconsole: do not pass userdata up to the tail Breno Leitao
2024-09-09 16:05 ` Simon Horman
2024-09-10 9:44 ` Breno Leitao
2024-09-09 13:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 09/10] net: netconsole: split send_msg_fragmented Breno Leitao
2024-09-09 13:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/10] net: netconsole: fix wrong warning Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240909160303.GC2097826@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=max@kutsevol.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=thepacketgeek@gmail.com \
--cc=vlad.wing@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).