From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2F6E17E8EA for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 23:25:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726010719; cv=none; b=Zsgqm4dLqnElHmS1Orr9I3QtVbocauhuzPe3zAk4OzO/qokslWb8LUPfzkAacWrNQpN9vhROcHLuTtEHfRz4skLbQGUwzMOL4cxABUrZTEwkxZtgXen6Xt4mwYoGI8Oxm4KHkGnbGZiTpVxEoP4WrCDlc7dLMsAFsiESD1xfnQQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726010719; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gR8uWyV+f+ZkUkVX4E42pi0F44CyRXoVLVMmMtpnGnQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=p+UEfspri6hXldRVod/uUj/Qo8pb+ABnmrbjBrnTzliRmRarmLB52fp9ZFQpoLXMxoFBNS9BLaWpOfuYaqUzULsvbj1EwJNiWMGHkJgbVxeub7oP4Z1fd8E9ZI4EZT93xNIJP8+IUTQUe/kizxgxEHktKmx9l1FvcQpKkBam6j0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=JxCiXiAa; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="JxCiXiAa" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A1C4CC4CEC3; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 23:25:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1726010719; bh=gR8uWyV+f+ZkUkVX4E42pi0F44CyRXoVLVMmMtpnGnQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JxCiXiAabeycd5lXNVOtGtl8riD4NCcuVCfEVSV6k5TbplbVh+ly2hLtwL1RsEq3R AB/5A5i/PqxG9fX+RUg1eK6zhSuntD7yYzmNAbcfGFqbWdYT3jVmD5+azUOqwNtVX0 2WMPQ1vU9Bh/bdGqogsbfXhXEeScfX/w4i5Re3HCRIPcz0CKK/63JRGQl3nIoG3BEw hWuJwM4NTolS9BYb5J4VHttJG4b1ZGxDUQLpUbB3v+zZxv41N8kjnAWJeEjL59WVb5 tJopM+aClqu1d0qugg635rT4jLGR6cvTOr3B8OlhRBlAb+DgTo/Vsm2S6rI1M+c0p8 Jyztm+imF2N4g== Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 16:25:17 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Lukasz Majewski Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , syzbot+3d602af7549af539274e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] net: hsr: Use the seqnr lock for frames received via interlink port. Message-ID: <20240910162517.2b226a71@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20240909114948.129735b9@wsk> References: <20240906132816.657485-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20240906132816.657485-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20240909114948.129735b9@wsk> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 9 Sep 2024 11:49:48 +0200 Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > + if (port->type == HSR_PT_INTERLINK) { > > + spin_lock_bh(&hsr->seqnr_lock); > > I'm just wondering if this could have impact on offloaded HSR operation. > > I will try to run hsr_redbox.sh test on this patch (with QEMU) and > share results. Hi Lukasz, any luck with the testing?