From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65D221B4C3F; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:43:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726155803; cv=none; b=d1SS53GlYATPHGXd2bJ2BTzT8IBPzviIwpXRLPUNOll9JmKkh+cAILgOmymJEtfYsiKpocQKxfkcstzhArIpagddC70hl5yiOpbkBeYn7sSxeD9EoCAj7hEVBgWQEjpqCkYEl4+xcO7Y8Q7Fh4DfSXQ0Il6/L0AxoS++WN9hfvc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726155803; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1dnbxympOIF+tngqPF0O0fLCSge+TV8u1h+YESuf8L8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=DV0VxFIYwswiy7UV0WzwMkhqmFV43vLOMTxuoeSRkh38dpc8gc8AMWsX9W7y645jSK5p2ReuaqWfLdWh0hgu+GS54EDHNHw7cydAscdWG5JIMHrGIRn21bMXDEeGtd9CG9YZ1gjUrZA5eVzjJrrdT/aFmj1LXllpelQJ+N9qwzM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=c6gSNx66; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="c6gSNx66" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D79B2C4CEC3; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:43:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1726155803; bh=1dnbxympOIF+tngqPF0O0fLCSge+TV8u1h+YESuf8L8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=c6gSNx66ZtiCGKPeWBEK1gPF/M7S0N5qgX6eTl0bNeWlDraCBsHufu+4tgFVCQcYV jiPt2hPqzPvXHdAB3BgVVV7xNApprZOxbyJJ/flNIw70Y1/qJzukVU1yuLx1eFWygL f/D+0ogiquU4pxfA/8Se57xjSvIYBueXlLJl9tJEUGK9ZnV0dlkDIgooceOxy+T0Mw JTYyEDc12bxRsT0g/yNaNBPnyS5R3NfMWn/ndB9hIqlTF2geDrlTqCKJAxGa3gWN/r LNAKQQpV6iGI2L5Mr80jdpLTbodEFmlv6kX35kXky3QygIk5JmiNLbVpLnJy2AemBr gEMv1S+KWHbcg== Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 08:43:22 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Sean Anderson Cc: Radhey Shyam Pandey , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Robert Hancock , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michal Simek , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: xilinx: axienet: Schedule NAPI in two steps Message-ID: <20240912084322.148d7fb2@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20240909231904.1322387-1-sean.anderson@linux.dev> <20240910185801.42b7c17f@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:23:06 -0400 Sean Anderson wrote: > __napi_schedule_irqoff selects between __napi_schedule and > ____napi_schedule based on whether PREEMPT_RT is enabled. Is there some > other way to force IRQ threading? I think so, IIRC threadirqs= kernel boot option lets you do it. I don't remember all the details now :( LMK if I'm wrong