netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Cc: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
	"ast@kernel.org" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"daniel@iogearbox.net" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"hawk@kernel.org" <hawk@kernel.org>,
	"john.fastabend@gmail.com" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	"imx@lists.linux.dev" <imx@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 3/3] net: enetc: reset xdp_tx_in_flight when updating bpf program
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 17:25:11 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240920142511.aph5wpmiczcsxfgr@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PAXPR04MB85101DE84124D424264BB4FD886C2@PAXPR04MB8510.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 05:05:14PM +0300, Wei Fang wrote:
> > zero init is good but shouldn't you be draining these buffers when removing
> > XDP resources at least? what happens with DMA mappings that are related to
> > these cached buffers?
> > 
> 
> All the buffers will be freed and DMA will be unmapped when XDP program is
> installed.

There is still a problem with the patch you proposed here, which is that
enetc_reconfigure() has one more call site, from enetc_hwtstamp_set().
If enetc_free_rxtx_rings() is the one that gets rid of the stale
buffers, it should also be the one that resets xdp_tx_in_flight,
otherwise you will still leave the problem unsolved where XDP_TX can be
interrupted by a change in hwtstamping state, and the software "in flight"
counter gets out of sync with the ring state.

Also, I suspect that the blamed commit is wrong. Also the normal netdev
close path should be susceptible to this issue, not just enetc_reconfigure().
Maybe something like ff58fda09096 ("net: enetc: prioritize ability to go
down over packet processing"). That's when we started rushing the NAPI
poll routing to finish. I don't think it was possible, before that, to
close the netdev while there were XDP_TX frames pending to be recycled.

> I am thinking that another solution may be better, which is mentioned
> in another thread replying to Vladimir, so that xdp_tx_in_flight will naturally drop
> to 0, and the TX-related statistics will be more accurate.

Please give me some more time to analyze the flow after just your patch 2/3.
I have a draft reply, but I would still like to test some things.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-20 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-19  8:41 [PATCH net 0/3] net: enetc: fix some issues of XDP Wei Fang
2024-09-19  8:41 ` [PATCH net 1/3] net: enetc: remove xdp_drops statistic from enetc_xdp_drop() Wei Fang
2024-09-20 12:08   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2024-09-23  5:02   ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2024-09-23  5:53     ` Wei Fang
2024-09-27 14:25       ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-09-19  8:41 ` [PATCH net 2/3] net: enetc: fix the issues of XDP_REDIRECT feature Wei Fang
2024-09-20 12:50   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2024-09-27 14:41   ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-09-29  1:35     ` Wei Fang
2024-09-19  8:41 ` [PATCH net 3/3] net: enetc: reset xdp_tx_in_flight when updating bpf program Wei Fang
2024-09-19 13:21   ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-09-20  3:12     ` Wei Fang
2024-09-23  4:56       ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2024-09-23  5:48         ` Wei Fang
2024-09-20 13:04   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2024-09-20 14:05     ` Wei Fang
2024-09-20 14:25       ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2024-09-20 14:29         ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-09-23  1:59         ` Wei Fang
2024-09-27 14:33           ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-09-29  1:31             ` Wei Fang
2024-09-27 14:38   ` Vladimir Oltean
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-09-19 11:12 Subbaraya Sundeep

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240920142511.aph5wpmiczcsxfgr@skbuf \
    --to=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).